Cargando…
How instructions modify perception: An fMRI study investigating brain areas involved in attributing human agency
Behavioural studies suggest that the processing of movement stimuli is influenced by beliefs about the agency behind these actions. The current study examined how activity in social and action related brain areas differs when participants were instructed that identical movement stimuli were either h...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Academic Press
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2887490/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20398769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.04.025 |
_version_ | 1782182564236099584 |
---|---|
author | Stanley, James Gowen, Emma Miall, R. Christopher |
author_facet | Stanley, James Gowen, Emma Miall, R. Christopher |
author_sort | Stanley, James |
collection | PubMed |
description | Behavioural studies suggest that the processing of movement stimuli is influenced by beliefs about the agency behind these actions. The current study examined how activity in social and action related brain areas differs when participants were instructed that identical movement stimuli were either human or computer generated. Participants viewed a series of point-light animation figures derived from motion-capture recordings of a moving actor, while functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to monitor patterns of neural activity. The stimuli were scrambled to produce a range of stimulus realism categories; furthermore, before each trial participants were told that they were about to view either a recording of human movement or a computer-simulated pattern of movement. Behavioural results suggested that agency instructions influenced participants' perceptions of the stimuli. The fMRI analysis indicated different functions within the paracingulate cortex: ventral paracingulate cortex was more active for human compared to computer agency instructed trials across all stimulus types, whereas dorsal paracingulate cortex was activated more highly in conflicting conditions (human instruction, low realism or vice versa). These findings support the hypothesis that ventral paracingulate encodes stimuli deemed to be of human origin, whereas dorsal paracingulate cortex is involved more in the ascertainment of human or intentional agency during the observation of ambiguous stimuli. Our results highlight the importance of prior instructions or beliefs on movement processing and the role of the paracingulate cortex in integrating prior knowledge with bottom-up stimuli. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2887490 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Academic Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28874902010-07-09 How instructions modify perception: An fMRI study investigating brain areas involved in attributing human agency Stanley, James Gowen, Emma Miall, R. Christopher Neuroimage Article Behavioural studies suggest that the processing of movement stimuli is influenced by beliefs about the agency behind these actions. The current study examined how activity in social and action related brain areas differs when participants were instructed that identical movement stimuli were either human or computer generated. Participants viewed a series of point-light animation figures derived from motion-capture recordings of a moving actor, while functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to monitor patterns of neural activity. The stimuli were scrambled to produce a range of stimulus realism categories; furthermore, before each trial participants were told that they were about to view either a recording of human movement or a computer-simulated pattern of movement. Behavioural results suggested that agency instructions influenced participants' perceptions of the stimuli. The fMRI analysis indicated different functions within the paracingulate cortex: ventral paracingulate cortex was more active for human compared to computer agency instructed trials across all stimulus types, whereas dorsal paracingulate cortex was activated more highly in conflicting conditions (human instruction, low realism or vice versa). These findings support the hypothesis that ventral paracingulate encodes stimuli deemed to be of human origin, whereas dorsal paracingulate cortex is involved more in the ascertainment of human or intentional agency during the observation of ambiguous stimuli. Our results highlight the importance of prior instructions or beliefs on movement processing and the role of the paracingulate cortex in integrating prior knowledge with bottom-up stimuli. Academic Press 2010-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2887490/ /pubmed/20398769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.04.025 Text en © 2010 Elsevier Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Open Access under CC BY 3.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) license |
spellingShingle | Article Stanley, James Gowen, Emma Miall, R. Christopher How instructions modify perception: An fMRI study investigating brain areas involved in attributing human agency |
title | How instructions modify perception: An fMRI study investigating brain areas involved in attributing human agency |
title_full | How instructions modify perception: An fMRI study investigating brain areas involved in attributing human agency |
title_fullStr | How instructions modify perception: An fMRI study investigating brain areas involved in attributing human agency |
title_full_unstemmed | How instructions modify perception: An fMRI study investigating brain areas involved in attributing human agency |
title_short | How instructions modify perception: An fMRI study investigating brain areas involved in attributing human agency |
title_sort | how instructions modify perception: an fmri study investigating brain areas involved in attributing human agency |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2887490/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20398769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.04.025 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stanleyjames howinstructionsmodifyperceptionanfmristudyinvestigatingbrainareasinvolvedinattributinghumanagency AT gowenemma howinstructionsmodifyperceptionanfmristudyinvestigatingbrainareasinvolvedinattributinghumanagency AT miallrchristopher howinstructionsmodifyperceptionanfmristudyinvestigatingbrainareasinvolvedinattributinghumanagency |