Cargando…

Wired for Her Face? Male Attentional Bias for Female Faces

Under conditions of inattention or deficits in orienting attention, special classes of stimuli (e.g. faces, bodies) are more likely to be perceived than other stimuli. This suggests that biologically salient visual stimuli automatically recruit attention, even when they are task-irrelevant or ignore...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Okazaki, Yuka, Abrahamyan, Arman, Stevens, Catherine J., Ioannides, Andreas A.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2887505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19809873
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10548-009-0112-7
_version_ 1782182566860685312
author Okazaki, Yuka
Abrahamyan, Arman
Stevens, Catherine J.
Ioannides, Andreas A.
author_facet Okazaki, Yuka
Abrahamyan, Arman
Stevens, Catherine J.
Ioannides, Andreas A.
author_sort Okazaki, Yuka
collection PubMed
description Under conditions of inattention or deficits in orienting attention, special classes of stimuli (e.g. faces, bodies) are more likely to be perceived than other stimuli. This suggests that biologically salient visual stimuli automatically recruit attention, even when they are task-irrelevant or ignored. Here we report results from a behavioral experiment with female and male subjects and two magnetoencephalography (MEG) experiments with male subjects only, in which we investigated attentional capture with face and hand stimuli. In both the behavioral and MEG experiments, subjects were required to count the number of gender-specific targets from either face or hand categories within a block of stimuli. In the behavioral experiment, we found that male subjects were significantly more accurate in response to female than male face target blocks. There was no corresponding effect found in response to hand target blocks. Female subjects did not show a gender-based difference in response to face or hand target blocks. MEG results indicated that the male subjects’ responses to face stimuli in primary visual cortex (V1) and the face-selective part of the fusiform gyrus (FG) were reduced when male face stimuli were not relevant to the task, whereas female faces maintained a strong response in these areas in both task-relevant and task-irrelevant conditions. These results suggest that within the male brain, female face stimuli are more resilient to suppression than male faces, once attention is drawn to the part of the visual field where the face appears.
format Text
id pubmed-2887505
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28875052010-07-12 Wired for Her Face? Male Attentional Bias for Female Faces Okazaki, Yuka Abrahamyan, Arman Stevens, Catherine J. Ioannides, Andreas A. Brain Topogr Original Paper Under conditions of inattention or deficits in orienting attention, special classes of stimuli (e.g. faces, bodies) are more likely to be perceived than other stimuli. This suggests that biologically salient visual stimuli automatically recruit attention, even when they are task-irrelevant or ignored. Here we report results from a behavioral experiment with female and male subjects and two magnetoencephalography (MEG) experiments with male subjects only, in which we investigated attentional capture with face and hand stimuli. In both the behavioral and MEG experiments, subjects were required to count the number of gender-specific targets from either face or hand categories within a block of stimuli. In the behavioral experiment, we found that male subjects were significantly more accurate in response to female than male face target blocks. There was no corresponding effect found in response to hand target blocks. Female subjects did not show a gender-based difference in response to face or hand target blocks. MEG results indicated that the male subjects’ responses to face stimuli in primary visual cortex (V1) and the face-selective part of the fusiform gyrus (FG) were reduced when male face stimuli were not relevant to the task, whereas female faces maintained a strong response in these areas in both task-relevant and task-irrelevant conditions. These results suggest that within the male brain, female face stimuli are more resilient to suppression than male faces, once attention is drawn to the part of the visual field where the face appears. Springer US 2009-10-07 2010-03 /pmc/articles/PMC2887505/ /pubmed/19809873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10548-009-0112-7 Text en © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009
spellingShingle Original Paper
Okazaki, Yuka
Abrahamyan, Arman
Stevens, Catherine J.
Ioannides, Andreas A.
Wired for Her Face? Male Attentional Bias for Female Faces
title Wired for Her Face? Male Attentional Bias for Female Faces
title_full Wired for Her Face? Male Attentional Bias for Female Faces
title_fullStr Wired for Her Face? Male Attentional Bias for Female Faces
title_full_unstemmed Wired for Her Face? Male Attentional Bias for Female Faces
title_short Wired for Her Face? Male Attentional Bias for Female Faces
title_sort wired for her face? male attentional bias for female faces
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2887505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19809873
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10548-009-0112-7
work_keys_str_mv AT okazakiyuka wiredforherfacemaleattentionalbiasforfemalefaces
AT abrahamyanarman wiredforherfacemaleattentionalbiasforfemalefaces
AT stevenscatherinej wiredforherfacemaleattentionalbiasforfemalefaces
AT ioannidesandreasa wiredforherfacemaleattentionalbiasforfemalefaces