Cargando…

Proposed protective mechanism of the pancreas in the rat

BACKGROUND: Heparan sulphate is known to have various functions in the animal body, including surveillance of tissue integrity. Administered intraperitoneally, it induces a systemic inflammatory response syndrome and when given locally in the pancreas it initiates a protective inflammatory response....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Axelsson, Jakob BF, Akbarshahi, Hamid, Said, Katarzyna, Malmström, Anders, Andersson, Roland
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2887862/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20482799
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-9255-7-24
_version_ 1782182600900608000
author Axelsson, Jakob BF
Akbarshahi, Hamid
Said, Katarzyna
Malmström, Anders
Andersson, Roland
author_facet Axelsson, Jakob BF
Akbarshahi, Hamid
Said, Katarzyna
Malmström, Anders
Andersson, Roland
author_sort Axelsson, Jakob BF
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Heparan sulphate is known to have various functions in the animal body, including surveillance of tissue integrity. Administered intraperitoneally, it induces a systemic inflammatory response syndrome and when given locally in the pancreas it initiates a protective inflammatory response. The aim of the present study was to investigate the underlying mechanisms behind cell recruitment following intra-ductal infusion of heparan sulphate. METHODS: Rats were subjected to intraductal-infusion of heparan sulphate, lipopolysaccharide and phosphate buffered saline into the pancreas. Pancreatic tissue was harvested 1, 3, 6, 9 or 48 hours after infusion and stained immunohistochemically for myeloperoxidase, ED-1, CINC-1 and MCP-1, as well as using eosin hematoxylin staining. Furthermore, MPO activity and MCP-1 and CINC-1 concentrations of tissue homogenates were measured. All differences were analyzed statistically using the Mann-Whitney U-test. RESULTS: During HS infusion, a rapid influx of macrophages/monocytes, as visualized as ED-1 positive cells, was seen reaching a maximum at 6 hours. After 48 hours, the same levels of ED-1 positive cells were noted in the pancreatic tissue, but with different location and morphology. Increased neutrophil numbers of heparan sulphate treated animals compared to control could be detected only 9 hours after infusion. The number of neutrophils was lower than the number of ED-1 positive cells. On the contrary, LPS infusion caused increased neutrophil numbers to a larger extent than heparan sulphate. Furthermore, this accumulation of neutrophils preceded the infiltration of ED-1 positive cells. Chemokine expression correlates very well to the cell infiltrate. MCP-1 was evident in the ductal cells of both groups early on. MCP-1 preceded monocyte infiltration in both groups, while the CINC-1 increase was only noticeable in the LPS group. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that heparan and LPS both induce host defense reactions, though by using different mechanisms of cell-recruitment. This implies that the etiology of pancreatic inflammation may influence how the subsequent events will develop.
format Text
id pubmed-2887862
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28878622010-06-19 Proposed protective mechanism of the pancreas in the rat Axelsson, Jakob BF Akbarshahi, Hamid Said, Katarzyna Malmström, Anders Andersson, Roland J Inflamm (Lond) Research BACKGROUND: Heparan sulphate is known to have various functions in the animal body, including surveillance of tissue integrity. Administered intraperitoneally, it induces a systemic inflammatory response syndrome and when given locally in the pancreas it initiates a protective inflammatory response. The aim of the present study was to investigate the underlying mechanisms behind cell recruitment following intra-ductal infusion of heparan sulphate. METHODS: Rats were subjected to intraductal-infusion of heparan sulphate, lipopolysaccharide and phosphate buffered saline into the pancreas. Pancreatic tissue was harvested 1, 3, 6, 9 or 48 hours after infusion and stained immunohistochemically for myeloperoxidase, ED-1, CINC-1 and MCP-1, as well as using eosin hematoxylin staining. Furthermore, MPO activity and MCP-1 and CINC-1 concentrations of tissue homogenates were measured. All differences were analyzed statistically using the Mann-Whitney U-test. RESULTS: During HS infusion, a rapid influx of macrophages/monocytes, as visualized as ED-1 positive cells, was seen reaching a maximum at 6 hours. After 48 hours, the same levels of ED-1 positive cells were noted in the pancreatic tissue, but with different location and morphology. Increased neutrophil numbers of heparan sulphate treated animals compared to control could be detected only 9 hours after infusion. The number of neutrophils was lower than the number of ED-1 positive cells. On the contrary, LPS infusion caused increased neutrophil numbers to a larger extent than heparan sulphate. Furthermore, this accumulation of neutrophils preceded the infiltration of ED-1 positive cells. Chemokine expression correlates very well to the cell infiltrate. MCP-1 was evident in the ductal cells of both groups early on. MCP-1 preceded monocyte infiltration in both groups, while the CINC-1 increase was only noticeable in the LPS group. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that heparan and LPS both induce host defense reactions, though by using different mechanisms of cell-recruitment. This implies that the etiology of pancreatic inflammation may influence how the subsequent events will develop. BioMed Central 2010-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC2887862/ /pubmed/20482799 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-9255-7-24 Text en Copyright ©2010 Axelsson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Axelsson, Jakob BF
Akbarshahi, Hamid
Said, Katarzyna
Malmström, Anders
Andersson, Roland
Proposed protective mechanism of the pancreas in the rat
title Proposed protective mechanism of the pancreas in the rat
title_full Proposed protective mechanism of the pancreas in the rat
title_fullStr Proposed protective mechanism of the pancreas in the rat
title_full_unstemmed Proposed protective mechanism of the pancreas in the rat
title_short Proposed protective mechanism of the pancreas in the rat
title_sort proposed protective mechanism of the pancreas in the rat
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2887862/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20482799
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-9255-7-24
work_keys_str_mv AT axelssonjakobbf proposedprotectivemechanismofthepancreasintherat
AT akbarshahihamid proposedprotectivemechanismofthepancreasintherat
AT saidkatarzyna proposedprotectivemechanismofthepancreasintherat
AT malmstromanders proposedprotectivemechanismofthepancreasintherat
AT anderssonroland proposedprotectivemechanismofthepancreasintherat