Cargando…

A Randomised Trial to Compare the Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Three Drug Combinations for Intermittent Preventive Treatment in Children

BACKGROUND: Results from trials of intermittent preventive treatment (IPT) in infants and children have shown that IPT provides significant protection against clinical malaria. Sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) given alone or in combination with other drugs has been used for most IPT programmes. Howeve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bojang, Kalifa, Akor, Francis, Bittaye, Ousman, Conway, David, Bottomley, Christian, Milligan, Paul, Greenwood, Brian
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2888611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20574538
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011225
_version_ 1782182667464212480
author Bojang, Kalifa
Akor, Francis
Bittaye, Ousman
Conway, David
Bottomley, Christian
Milligan, Paul
Greenwood, Brian
author_facet Bojang, Kalifa
Akor, Francis
Bittaye, Ousman
Conway, David
Bottomley, Christian
Milligan, Paul
Greenwood, Brian
author_sort Bojang, Kalifa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Results from trials of intermittent preventive treatment (IPT) in infants and children have shown that IPT provides significant protection against clinical malaria. Sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) given alone or in combination with other drugs has been used for most IPT programmes. However, SP resistance is increasing in many parts of Africa. Thus, we have investigated whether SP plus AQ, SP plus piperaquine (PQ) and dihydroartemisinin (DHA) plus PQ might be equally safe and effective when used for IPT in children in an area of seasonal transmission. METHODS: During the 2007 malaria transmission season, 1008 Gambian children were individually randomized to receive SP plus amodiaquine (AQ), SP plus piperaquine (PQ) or dihydroartemisinin (DHA) plus PQ at monthly intervals on three occasions during the peak malaria transmission season. To determine the risk of side effects following drug administration, participants in each treatment group were visited at home three days after the start of each round of drug administration and a side effects questionnaire completed. To help establish whether adverse events were drug related, the same questionnaire was administered to 286 age matched control children recruited from adjacent villages. Morbidity was monitored throughout the malaria transmission season and study children were seen at the end of the malaria transmission season. RESULTS: All three treatment regimens showed good safety profiles. No severe adverse event related to IPT was reported. The most frequent adverse events reported were coughing, diarrhoea, vomiting, abdominal pain and loss of appetite. Cough was present in 15.2%, 15.4% and 18.7% of study subjects who received SP plus AQ, DHA plus PQ or SP plus PQ respectively, compared to 19.2% in a control group. The incidence of malaria in the DHA plus PQ, SP plus AQ and SP plus PQ groups were 0.10 cases per child year (95% CI: 0.05, 0.22), 0.06 (95% CI: 0.022, 0.16) and 0.06 (95% CI: 0.02, 0.15) respectively. The incidence of malaria in the control group was 0.79 cases per child year (0.58, 1.08). CONCLUSION: All the three regimens of IPT in children were safe and highly efficacious TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00561899
format Text
id pubmed-2888611
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28886112010-06-23 A Randomised Trial to Compare the Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Three Drug Combinations for Intermittent Preventive Treatment in Children Bojang, Kalifa Akor, Francis Bittaye, Ousman Conway, David Bottomley, Christian Milligan, Paul Greenwood, Brian PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Results from trials of intermittent preventive treatment (IPT) in infants and children have shown that IPT provides significant protection against clinical malaria. Sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) given alone or in combination with other drugs has been used for most IPT programmes. However, SP resistance is increasing in many parts of Africa. Thus, we have investigated whether SP plus AQ, SP plus piperaquine (PQ) and dihydroartemisinin (DHA) plus PQ might be equally safe and effective when used for IPT in children in an area of seasonal transmission. METHODS: During the 2007 malaria transmission season, 1008 Gambian children were individually randomized to receive SP plus amodiaquine (AQ), SP plus piperaquine (PQ) or dihydroartemisinin (DHA) plus PQ at monthly intervals on three occasions during the peak malaria transmission season. To determine the risk of side effects following drug administration, participants in each treatment group were visited at home three days after the start of each round of drug administration and a side effects questionnaire completed. To help establish whether adverse events were drug related, the same questionnaire was administered to 286 age matched control children recruited from adjacent villages. Morbidity was monitored throughout the malaria transmission season and study children were seen at the end of the malaria transmission season. RESULTS: All three treatment regimens showed good safety profiles. No severe adverse event related to IPT was reported. The most frequent adverse events reported were coughing, diarrhoea, vomiting, abdominal pain and loss of appetite. Cough was present in 15.2%, 15.4% and 18.7% of study subjects who received SP plus AQ, DHA plus PQ or SP plus PQ respectively, compared to 19.2% in a control group. The incidence of malaria in the DHA plus PQ, SP plus AQ and SP plus PQ groups were 0.10 cases per child year (95% CI: 0.05, 0.22), 0.06 (95% CI: 0.022, 0.16) and 0.06 (95% CI: 0.02, 0.15) respectively. The incidence of malaria in the control group was 0.79 cases per child year (0.58, 1.08). CONCLUSION: All the three regimens of IPT in children were safe and highly efficacious TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00561899 Public Library of Science 2010-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC2888611/ /pubmed/20574538 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011225 Text en Bojang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bojang, Kalifa
Akor, Francis
Bittaye, Ousman
Conway, David
Bottomley, Christian
Milligan, Paul
Greenwood, Brian
A Randomised Trial to Compare the Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Three Drug Combinations for Intermittent Preventive Treatment in Children
title A Randomised Trial to Compare the Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Three Drug Combinations for Intermittent Preventive Treatment in Children
title_full A Randomised Trial to Compare the Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Three Drug Combinations for Intermittent Preventive Treatment in Children
title_fullStr A Randomised Trial to Compare the Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Three Drug Combinations for Intermittent Preventive Treatment in Children
title_full_unstemmed A Randomised Trial to Compare the Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Three Drug Combinations for Intermittent Preventive Treatment in Children
title_short A Randomised Trial to Compare the Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Three Drug Combinations for Intermittent Preventive Treatment in Children
title_sort randomised trial to compare the safety, tolerability and efficacy of three drug combinations for intermittent preventive treatment in children
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2888611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20574538
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011225
work_keys_str_mv AT bojangkalifa arandomisedtrialtocomparethesafetytolerabilityandefficacyofthreedrugcombinationsforintermittentpreventivetreatmentinchildren
AT akorfrancis arandomisedtrialtocomparethesafetytolerabilityandefficacyofthreedrugcombinationsforintermittentpreventivetreatmentinchildren
AT bittayeousman arandomisedtrialtocomparethesafetytolerabilityandefficacyofthreedrugcombinationsforintermittentpreventivetreatmentinchildren
AT conwaydavid arandomisedtrialtocomparethesafetytolerabilityandefficacyofthreedrugcombinationsforintermittentpreventivetreatmentinchildren
AT bottomleychristian arandomisedtrialtocomparethesafetytolerabilityandefficacyofthreedrugcombinationsforintermittentpreventivetreatmentinchildren
AT milliganpaul arandomisedtrialtocomparethesafetytolerabilityandefficacyofthreedrugcombinationsforintermittentpreventivetreatmentinchildren
AT greenwoodbrian arandomisedtrialtocomparethesafetytolerabilityandefficacyofthreedrugcombinationsforintermittentpreventivetreatmentinchildren
AT bojangkalifa randomisedtrialtocomparethesafetytolerabilityandefficacyofthreedrugcombinationsforintermittentpreventivetreatmentinchildren
AT akorfrancis randomisedtrialtocomparethesafetytolerabilityandefficacyofthreedrugcombinationsforintermittentpreventivetreatmentinchildren
AT bittayeousman randomisedtrialtocomparethesafetytolerabilityandefficacyofthreedrugcombinationsforintermittentpreventivetreatmentinchildren
AT conwaydavid randomisedtrialtocomparethesafetytolerabilityandefficacyofthreedrugcombinationsforintermittentpreventivetreatmentinchildren
AT bottomleychristian randomisedtrialtocomparethesafetytolerabilityandefficacyofthreedrugcombinationsforintermittentpreventivetreatmentinchildren
AT milliganpaul randomisedtrialtocomparethesafetytolerabilityandefficacyofthreedrugcombinationsforintermittentpreventivetreatmentinchildren
AT greenwoodbrian randomisedtrialtocomparethesafetytolerabilityandefficacyofthreedrugcombinationsforintermittentpreventivetreatmentinchildren