Cargando…
A forced titration study of the antioxidant and immunomodulatory effects of Ambrotose AO supplement
BACKGROUND: Oxidative stress plays a role in acute and chronic inflammatory disease and antioxidant supplementation has demonstrated beneficial effects in the treatment of these conditions. This study was designed to determine the optimal dose of an antioxidant supplement in healthy volunteers to in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2888736/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20433711 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-10-16 |
_version_ | 1782182669847625728 |
---|---|
author | Myers, Stephen P Stevenson, Lesley Cheras, Phillip A O'Connor, Joan Brooks, Lyndon Rolfe, Margaret Conellan, Paul Morris, Carol |
author_facet | Myers, Stephen P Stevenson, Lesley Cheras, Phillip A O'Connor, Joan Brooks, Lyndon Rolfe, Margaret Conellan, Paul Morris, Carol |
author_sort | Myers, Stephen P |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Oxidative stress plays a role in acute and chronic inflammatory disease and antioxidant supplementation has demonstrated beneficial effects in the treatment of these conditions. This study was designed to determine the optimal dose of an antioxidant supplement in healthy volunteers to inform a Phase 3 clinical trial. METHODS: The study was designed as a combined Phase 1 and 2 open label, forced titration dose response study in healthy volunteers (n = 21) to determine both acute safety and efficacy. Participants received a dietary supplement in a forced titration over five weeks commencing with a no treatment baseline through 1, 2, 4 and 8 capsules. The primary outcome measurement was ex vivo changes in serum oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC). The secondary outcome measures were undertaken as an exploratory investigation of immune function. RESULTS: A significant increase in antioxidant activity (serum ORAC) was observed between baseline (no capsules) and the highest dose of 8 capsules per day (p = 0.040) representing a change of 36.6%. A quadratic function for dose levels was fitted in order to estimate a dose response curve for estimating the optimal dose. The quadratic component of the curve was significant (p = 0.047), with predicted serum ORAC scores increasing from the zero dose to a maximum at a predicted dose of 4.7 capsules per day and decreasing for higher doses. Among the secondary outcome measures, a significant dose effect was observed on phagocytosis of granulocytes, and a significant increase was also observed on Cox 2 expression. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that Ambrotose AO(® )capsules appear to be safe and most effective at a dosage of 4 capsules/day. It is important that this study is not over interpreted; it aimed to find an optimal dose to assess the dietary supplement using a more rigorous clinical trial design. The study achieved this aim and demonstrated that the dietary supplement has the potential to increase antioxidant activity. The most significant limitation of this study was that it was open label Phase 1/Phase 2 trial and is subject to potential bias that is reduced with the use of randomization and blinding. To confirm the benefits of this dietary supplement these effects now need to be demonstrated in a Phase 3 randomised controlled trial (RCT). TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Register: ACTRN12605000258651 |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2888736 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28887362010-06-22 A forced titration study of the antioxidant and immunomodulatory effects of Ambrotose AO supplement Myers, Stephen P Stevenson, Lesley Cheras, Phillip A O'Connor, Joan Brooks, Lyndon Rolfe, Margaret Conellan, Paul Morris, Carol BMC Complement Altern Med Research article BACKGROUND: Oxidative stress plays a role in acute and chronic inflammatory disease and antioxidant supplementation has demonstrated beneficial effects in the treatment of these conditions. This study was designed to determine the optimal dose of an antioxidant supplement in healthy volunteers to inform a Phase 3 clinical trial. METHODS: The study was designed as a combined Phase 1 and 2 open label, forced titration dose response study in healthy volunteers (n = 21) to determine both acute safety and efficacy. Participants received a dietary supplement in a forced titration over five weeks commencing with a no treatment baseline through 1, 2, 4 and 8 capsules. The primary outcome measurement was ex vivo changes in serum oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC). The secondary outcome measures were undertaken as an exploratory investigation of immune function. RESULTS: A significant increase in antioxidant activity (serum ORAC) was observed between baseline (no capsules) and the highest dose of 8 capsules per day (p = 0.040) representing a change of 36.6%. A quadratic function for dose levels was fitted in order to estimate a dose response curve for estimating the optimal dose. The quadratic component of the curve was significant (p = 0.047), with predicted serum ORAC scores increasing from the zero dose to a maximum at a predicted dose of 4.7 capsules per day and decreasing for higher doses. Among the secondary outcome measures, a significant dose effect was observed on phagocytosis of granulocytes, and a significant increase was also observed on Cox 2 expression. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that Ambrotose AO(® )capsules appear to be safe and most effective at a dosage of 4 capsules/day. It is important that this study is not over interpreted; it aimed to find an optimal dose to assess the dietary supplement using a more rigorous clinical trial design. The study achieved this aim and demonstrated that the dietary supplement has the potential to increase antioxidant activity. The most significant limitation of this study was that it was open label Phase 1/Phase 2 trial and is subject to potential bias that is reduced with the use of randomization and blinding. To confirm the benefits of this dietary supplement these effects now need to be demonstrated in a Phase 3 randomised controlled trial (RCT). TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Register: ACTRN12605000258651 BioMed Central 2010-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC2888736/ /pubmed/20433711 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-10-16 Text en Copyright ©2010 Myers et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research article Myers, Stephen P Stevenson, Lesley Cheras, Phillip A O'Connor, Joan Brooks, Lyndon Rolfe, Margaret Conellan, Paul Morris, Carol A forced titration study of the antioxidant and immunomodulatory effects of Ambrotose AO supplement |
title | A forced titration study of the antioxidant and immunomodulatory effects of Ambrotose AO supplement |
title_full | A forced titration study of the antioxidant and immunomodulatory effects of Ambrotose AO supplement |
title_fullStr | A forced titration study of the antioxidant and immunomodulatory effects of Ambrotose AO supplement |
title_full_unstemmed | A forced titration study of the antioxidant and immunomodulatory effects of Ambrotose AO supplement |
title_short | A forced titration study of the antioxidant and immunomodulatory effects of Ambrotose AO supplement |
title_sort | forced titration study of the antioxidant and immunomodulatory effects of ambrotose ao supplement |
topic | Research article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2888736/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20433711 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-10-16 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT myersstephenp aforcedtitrationstudyoftheantioxidantandimmunomodulatoryeffectsofambrotoseaosupplement AT stevensonlesley aforcedtitrationstudyoftheantioxidantandimmunomodulatoryeffectsofambrotoseaosupplement AT cherasphillipa aforcedtitrationstudyoftheantioxidantandimmunomodulatoryeffectsofambrotoseaosupplement AT oconnorjoan aforcedtitrationstudyoftheantioxidantandimmunomodulatoryeffectsofambrotoseaosupplement AT brookslyndon aforcedtitrationstudyoftheantioxidantandimmunomodulatoryeffectsofambrotoseaosupplement AT rolfemargaret aforcedtitrationstudyoftheantioxidantandimmunomodulatoryeffectsofambrotoseaosupplement AT conellanpaul aforcedtitrationstudyoftheantioxidantandimmunomodulatoryeffectsofambrotoseaosupplement AT morriscarol aforcedtitrationstudyoftheantioxidantandimmunomodulatoryeffectsofambrotoseaosupplement AT myersstephenp forcedtitrationstudyoftheantioxidantandimmunomodulatoryeffectsofambrotoseaosupplement AT stevensonlesley forcedtitrationstudyoftheantioxidantandimmunomodulatoryeffectsofambrotoseaosupplement AT cherasphillipa forcedtitrationstudyoftheantioxidantandimmunomodulatoryeffectsofambrotoseaosupplement AT oconnorjoan forcedtitrationstudyoftheantioxidantandimmunomodulatoryeffectsofambrotoseaosupplement AT brookslyndon forcedtitrationstudyoftheantioxidantandimmunomodulatoryeffectsofambrotoseaosupplement AT rolfemargaret forcedtitrationstudyoftheantioxidantandimmunomodulatoryeffectsofambrotoseaosupplement AT conellanpaul forcedtitrationstudyoftheantioxidantandimmunomodulatoryeffectsofambrotoseaosupplement AT morriscarol forcedtitrationstudyoftheantioxidantandimmunomodulatoryeffectsofambrotoseaosupplement |