Cargando…
Sentinel Node Identification Rate and Nodal Involvement in the EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS Trial
BACKGROUND: The randomized EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS trial investigates whether breast cancer patients with a tumor-positive sentinel node biopsy (SNB) are best treated with an axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) or axillary radiotherapy (ART). The aim of the current substudy was to evaluate the id...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2889289/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20300966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-0945-z |
_version_ | 1782182685620305920 |
---|---|
author | Straver, Marieke E. Meijnen, Philip van Tienhoven, Geertjan van de Velde, Cornelis J. H. Mansel, Robert E. Bogaerts, Jan Duez, Nicole Cataliotti, Luigi Klinkenbijl, Jean H. G. Westenberg, Helen A. van der Mijle, Huub Snoj, Marko Hurkmans, Coen Rutgers, Emiel J. T. |
author_facet | Straver, Marieke E. Meijnen, Philip van Tienhoven, Geertjan van de Velde, Cornelis J. H. Mansel, Robert E. Bogaerts, Jan Duez, Nicole Cataliotti, Luigi Klinkenbijl, Jean H. G. Westenberg, Helen A. van der Mijle, Huub Snoj, Marko Hurkmans, Coen Rutgers, Emiel J. T. |
author_sort | Straver, Marieke E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The randomized EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS trial investigates whether breast cancer patients with a tumor-positive sentinel node biopsy (SNB) are best treated with an axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) or axillary radiotherapy (ART). The aim of the current substudy was to evaluate the identification rate and the nodal involvement. METHODS: The first 2,000 patients participating in the AMAROS trial were evaluated. Associations between the identification rate and technical, patient-, and tumor-related factors were evaluated. The outcome of the SNB procedure and potential further nodal involvement was assessed. RESULTS: In 65 patients, the sentinel node could not be identified. As a result, the sentinel node identification rate was 97% (1,888 of 1,953). Variables affecting the success rate were age, pathological tumor size, histology, year of accrual, and method of detection. The SNB results of 65% of the patients (n = 1,220) were negative and the patients underwent no further axillary treatment. The SNB results were positive in 34% of the patients (n = 647), including macrometastases (n = 409, 63%), micrometastases (n = 161, 25%), and isolated tumor cells (n = 77, 12%). Further nodal involvement in patients with macrometastases, micrometastases, and isolated tumor cells undergoing an ALND was 41, 18, and 18%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: With a 97% detection rate in this prospective international multicenter study, the SNB procedure is highly effective, especially when the combined method is used. Further nodal involvement in patients with micrometastases and isolated tumor cells in the sentinel node was similar—both were 18%. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2889289 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28892892010-07-12 Sentinel Node Identification Rate and Nodal Involvement in the EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS Trial Straver, Marieke E. Meijnen, Philip van Tienhoven, Geertjan van de Velde, Cornelis J. H. Mansel, Robert E. Bogaerts, Jan Duez, Nicole Cataliotti, Luigi Klinkenbijl, Jean H. G. Westenberg, Helen A. van der Mijle, Huub Snoj, Marko Hurkmans, Coen Rutgers, Emiel J. T. Ann Surg Oncol Breast Oncology BACKGROUND: The randomized EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS trial investigates whether breast cancer patients with a tumor-positive sentinel node biopsy (SNB) are best treated with an axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) or axillary radiotherapy (ART). The aim of the current substudy was to evaluate the identification rate and the nodal involvement. METHODS: The first 2,000 patients participating in the AMAROS trial were evaluated. Associations between the identification rate and technical, patient-, and tumor-related factors were evaluated. The outcome of the SNB procedure and potential further nodal involvement was assessed. RESULTS: In 65 patients, the sentinel node could not be identified. As a result, the sentinel node identification rate was 97% (1,888 of 1,953). Variables affecting the success rate were age, pathological tumor size, histology, year of accrual, and method of detection. The SNB results of 65% of the patients (n = 1,220) were negative and the patients underwent no further axillary treatment. The SNB results were positive in 34% of the patients (n = 647), including macrometastases (n = 409, 63%), micrometastases (n = 161, 25%), and isolated tumor cells (n = 77, 12%). Further nodal involvement in patients with macrometastases, micrometastases, and isolated tumor cells undergoing an ALND was 41, 18, and 18%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: With a 97% detection rate in this prospective international multicenter study, the SNB procedure is highly effective, especially when the combined method is used. Further nodal involvement in patients with micrometastases and isolated tumor cells in the sentinel node was similar—both were 18%. Springer-Verlag 2010-03-19 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2889289/ /pubmed/20300966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-0945-z Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Breast Oncology Straver, Marieke E. Meijnen, Philip van Tienhoven, Geertjan van de Velde, Cornelis J. H. Mansel, Robert E. Bogaerts, Jan Duez, Nicole Cataliotti, Luigi Klinkenbijl, Jean H. G. Westenberg, Helen A. van der Mijle, Huub Snoj, Marko Hurkmans, Coen Rutgers, Emiel J. T. Sentinel Node Identification Rate and Nodal Involvement in the EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS Trial |
title | Sentinel Node Identification Rate and Nodal Involvement in the EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS Trial |
title_full | Sentinel Node Identification Rate and Nodal Involvement in the EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS Trial |
title_fullStr | Sentinel Node Identification Rate and Nodal Involvement in the EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Sentinel Node Identification Rate and Nodal Involvement in the EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS Trial |
title_short | Sentinel Node Identification Rate and Nodal Involvement in the EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS Trial |
title_sort | sentinel node identification rate and nodal involvement in the eortc 10981-22023 amaros trial |
topic | Breast Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2889289/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20300966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-0945-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stravermariekee sentinelnodeidentificationrateandnodalinvolvementintheeortc1098122023amarostrial AT meijnenphilip sentinelnodeidentificationrateandnodalinvolvementintheeortc1098122023amarostrial AT vantienhovengeertjan sentinelnodeidentificationrateandnodalinvolvementintheeortc1098122023amarostrial AT vandeveldecornelisjh sentinelnodeidentificationrateandnodalinvolvementintheeortc1098122023amarostrial AT manselroberte sentinelnodeidentificationrateandnodalinvolvementintheeortc1098122023amarostrial AT bogaertsjan sentinelnodeidentificationrateandnodalinvolvementintheeortc1098122023amarostrial AT dueznicole sentinelnodeidentificationrateandnodalinvolvementintheeortc1098122023amarostrial AT cataliottiluigi sentinelnodeidentificationrateandnodalinvolvementintheeortc1098122023amarostrial AT klinkenbijljeanhg sentinelnodeidentificationrateandnodalinvolvementintheeortc1098122023amarostrial AT westenberghelena sentinelnodeidentificationrateandnodalinvolvementintheeortc1098122023amarostrial AT vandermijlehuub sentinelnodeidentificationrateandnodalinvolvementintheeortc1098122023amarostrial AT snojmarko sentinelnodeidentificationrateandnodalinvolvementintheeortc1098122023amarostrial AT hurkmanscoen sentinelnodeidentificationrateandnodalinvolvementintheeortc1098122023amarostrial AT rutgersemieljt sentinelnodeidentificationrateandnodalinvolvementintheeortc1098122023amarostrial |