Cargando…

Sentinel Node Identification Rate and Nodal Involvement in the EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS Trial

BACKGROUND: The randomized EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS trial investigates whether breast cancer patients with a tumor-positive sentinel node biopsy (SNB) are best treated with an axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) or axillary radiotherapy (ART). The aim of the current substudy was to evaluate the id...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Straver, Marieke E., Meijnen, Philip, van Tienhoven, Geertjan, van de Velde, Cornelis J. H., Mansel, Robert E., Bogaerts, Jan, Duez, Nicole, Cataliotti, Luigi, Klinkenbijl, Jean H. G., Westenberg, Helen A., van der Mijle, Huub, Snoj, Marko, Hurkmans, Coen, Rutgers, Emiel J. T.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2889289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20300966
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-0945-z
_version_ 1782182685620305920
author Straver, Marieke E.
Meijnen, Philip
van Tienhoven, Geertjan
van de Velde, Cornelis J. H.
Mansel, Robert E.
Bogaerts, Jan
Duez, Nicole
Cataliotti, Luigi
Klinkenbijl, Jean H. G.
Westenberg, Helen A.
van der Mijle, Huub
Snoj, Marko
Hurkmans, Coen
Rutgers, Emiel J. T.
author_facet Straver, Marieke E.
Meijnen, Philip
van Tienhoven, Geertjan
van de Velde, Cornelis J. H.
Mansel, Robert E.
Bogaerts, Jan
Duez, Nicole
Cataliotti, Luigi
Klinkenbijl, Jean H. G.
Westenberg, Helen A.
van der Mijle, Huub
Snoj, Marko
Hurkmans, Coen
Rutgers, Emiel J. T.
author_sort Straver, Marieke E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The randomized EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS trial investigates whether breast cancer patients with a tumor-positive sentinel node biopsy (SNB) are best treated with an axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) or axillary radiotherapy (ART). The aim of the current substudy was to evaluate the identification rate and the nodal involvement. METHODS: The first 2,000 patients participating in the AMAROS trial were evaluated. Associations between the identification rate and technical, patient-, and tumor-related factors were evaluated. The outcome of the SNB procedure and potential further nodal involvement was assessed. RESULTS: In 65 patients, the sentinel node could not be identified. As a result, the sentinel node identification rate was 97% (1,888 of 1,953). Variables affecting the success rate were age, pathological tumor size, histology, year of accrual, and method of detection. The SNB results of 65% of the patients (n = 1,220) were negative and the patients underwent no further axillary treatment. The SNB results were positive in 34% of the patients (n = 647), including macrometastases (n = 409, 63%), micrometastases (n = 161, 25%), and isolated tumor cells (n = 77, 12%). Further nodal involvement in patients with macrometastases, micrometastases, and isolated tumor cells undergoing an ALND was 41, 18, and 18%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: With a 97% detection rate in this prospective international multicenter study, the SNB procedure is highly effective, especially when the combined method is used. Further nodal involvement in patients with micrometastases and isolated tumor cells in the sentinel node was similar—both were 18%.
format Text
id pubmed-2889289
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28892892010-07-12 Sentinel Node Identification Rate and Nodal Involvement in the EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS Trial Straver, Marieke E. Meijnen, Philip van Tienhoven, Geertjan van de Velde, Cornelis J. H. Mansel, Robert E. Bogaerts, Jan Duez, Nicole Cataliotti, Luigi Klinkenbijl, Jean H. G. Westenberg, Helen A. van der Mijle, Huub Snoj, Marko Hurkmans, Coen Rutgers, Emiel J. T. Ann Surg Oncol Breast Oncology BACKGROUND: The randomized EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS trial investigates whether breast cancer patients with a tumor-positive sentinel node biopsy (SNB) are best treated with an axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) or axillary radiotherapy (ART). The aim of the current substudy was to evaluate the identification rate and the nodal involvement. METHODS: The first 2,000 patients participating in the AMAROS trial were evaluated. Associations between the identification rate and technical, patient-, and tumor-related factors were evaluated. The outcome of the SNB procedure and potential further nodal involvement was assessed. RESULTS: In 65 patients, the sentinel node could not be identified. As a result, the sentinel node identification rate was 97% (1,888 of 1,953). Variables affecting the success rate were age, pathological tumor size, histology, year of accrual, and method of detection. The SNB results of 65% of the patients (n = 1,220) were negative and the patients underwent no further axillary treatment. The SNB results were positive in 34% of the patients (n = 647), including macrometastases (n = 409, 63%), micrometastases (n = 161, 25%), and isolated tumor cells (n = 77, 12%). Further nodal involvement in patients with macrometastases, micrometastases, and isolated tumor cells undergoing an ALND was 41, 18, and 18%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: With a 97% detection rate in this prospective international multicenter study, the SNB procedure is highly effective, especially when the combined method is used. Further nodal involvement in patients with micrometastases and isolated tumor cells in the sentinel node was similar—both were 18%. Springer-Verlag 2010-03-19 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2889289/ /pubmed/20300966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-0945-z Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Breast Oncology
Straver, Marieke E.
Meijnen, Philip
van Tienhoven, Geertjan
van de Velde, Cornelis J. H.
Mansel, Robert E.
Bogaerts, Jan
Duez, Nicole
Cataliotti, Luigi
Klinkenbijl, Jean H. G.
Westenberg, Helen A.
van der Mijle, Huub
Snoj, Marko
Hurkmans, Coen
Rutgers, Emiel J. T.
Sentinel Node Identification Rate and Nodal Involvement in the EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS Trial
title Sentinel Node Identification Rate and Nodal Involvement in the EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS Trial
title_full Sentinel Node Identification Rate and Nodal Involvement in the EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS Trial
title_fullStr Sentinel Node Identification Rate and Nodal Involvement in the EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS Trial
title_full_unstemmed Sentinel Node Identification Rate and Nodal Involvement in the EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS Trial
title_short Sentinel Node Identification Rate and Nodal Involvement in the EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS Trial
title_sort sentinel node identification rate and nodal involvement in the eortc 10981-22023 amaros trial
topic Breast Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2889289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20300966
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-0945-z
work_keys_str_mv AT stravermariekee sentinelnodeidentificationrateandnodalinvolvementintheeortc1098122023amarostrial
AT meijnenphilip sentinelnodeidentificationrateandnodalinvolvementintheeortc1098122023amarostrial
AT vantienhovengeertjan sentinelnodeidentificationrateandnodalinvolvementintheeortc1098122023amarostrial
AT vandeveldecornelisjh sentinelnodeidentificationrateandnodalinvolvementintheeortc1098122023amarostrial
AT manselroberte sentinelnodeidentificationrateandnodalinvolvementintheeortc1098122023amarostrial
AT bogaertsjan sentinelnodeidentificationrateandnodalinvolvementintheeortc1098122023amarostrial
AT dueznicole sentinelnodeidentificationrateandnodalinvolvementintheeortc1098122023amarostrial
AT cataliottiluigi sentinelnodeidentificationrateandnodalinvolvementintheeortc1098122023amarostrial
AT klinkenbijljeanhg sentinelnodeidentificationrateandnodalinvolvementintheeortc1098122023amarostrial
AT westenberghelena sentinelnodeidentificationrateandnodalinvolvementintheeortc1098122023amarostrial
AT vandermijlehuub sentinelnodeidentificationrateandnodalinvolvementintheeortc1098122023amarostrial
AT snojmarko sentinelnodeidentificationrateandnodalinvolvementintheeortc1098122023amarostrial
AT hurkmanscoen sentinelnodeidentificationrateandnodalinvolvementintheeortc1098122023amarostrial
AT rutgersemieljt sentinelnodeidentificationrateandnodalinvolvementintheeortc1098122023amarostrial