Cargando…
Study protocol: population screening for colorectal cancer by colonoscopy or CT colonography: a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most prevalent type of cancer in Europe. Early detection and removal of CRC or its precursor lesions by population screening can reduce mortality. Colonoscopy and computed tomography colonography (CT colonography) are highly accurate exams and screen...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2889851/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20482825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-10-47 |
_version_ | 1782182724218388480 |
---|---|
author | de Wijkerslooth, Thomas R de Haan, Margriet C Stoop, Esther M Deutekom, Marije Fockens, Paul Bossuyt, Patrick MM Thomeer, Maarten van Ballegooijen, Marjolein Essink-Bot, Marie-Louise van Leerdam, Monique E Kuipers, Ernst J Dekker, Evelien Stoker, Jaap |
author_facet | de Wijkerslooth, Thomas R de Haan, Margriet C Stoop, Esther M Deutekom, Marije Fockens, Paul Bossuyt, Patrick MM Thomeer, Maarten van Ballegooijen, Marjolein Essink-Bot, Marie-Louise van Leerdam, Monique E Kuipers, Ernst J Dekker, Evelien Stoker, Jaap |
author_sort | de Wijkerslooth, Thomas R |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most prevalent type of cancer in Europe. Early detection and removal of CRC or its precursor lesions by population screening can reduce mortality. Colonoscopy and computed tomography colonography (CT colonography) are highly accurate exams and screening options that examine the entire colon. The success of screening depends on the participation rate. We designed a randomized trial to compare the uptake, yield and costs of direct colonoscopy population screening, using either a telephone consultation or a consultation at the outpatient clinic, versus CT colonography first, with colonoscopy in CT colonography positives. METHODS AND DESIGN: 7,500 persons between 50 and 75 years will be randomly selected from the electronic database of the municipal administration registration and will receive an invitation to participate in either CT colonography (2,500 persons) or colonoscopy (5,000 persons) screening. Those invited for colonoscopy screening will be randomized to a prior consultation either by telephone or a visit at the outpatient clinic. All CT colonography invitees will have a prior consultation by telephone. Invitees are instructed to consult their general practitioner and not to participate in screening if they have symptoms suggestive for CRC. After providing informed consent, participants will be scheduled for the screening procedure. The primary outcome measure of this study is the participation rate. Secondary outcomes are the diagnostic yield, the expected and perceived burden of the screening test, level of informed choice and cost-effectiveness of both screening methods. DISCUSSION: This study will provide further evidence to enable decision making in population screening for colorectal cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch trial register: NTR1829 |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2889851 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28898512010-06-23 Study protocol: population screening for colorectal cancer by colonoscopy or CT colonography: a randomized controlled trial de Wijkerslooth, Thomas R de Haan, Margriet C Stoop, Esther M Deutekom, Marije Fockens, Paul Bossuyt, Patrick MM Thomeer, Maarten van Ballegooijen, Marjolein Essink-Bot, Marie-Louise van Leerdam, Monique E Kuipers, Ernst J Dekker, Evelien Stoker, Jaap BMC Gastroenterol Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most prevalent type of cancer in Europe. Early detection and removal of CRC or its precursor lesions by population screening can reduce mortality. Colonoscopy and computed tomography colonography (CT colonography) are highly accurate exams and screening options that examine the entire colon. The success of screening depends on the participation rate. We designed a randomized trial to compare the uptake, yield and costs of direct colonoscopy population screening, using either a telephone consultation or a consultation at the outpatient clinic, versus CT colonography first, with colonoscopy in CT colonography positives. METHODS AND DESIGN: 7,500 persons between 50 and 75 years will be randomly selected from the electronic database of the municipal administration registration and will receive an invitation to participate in either CT colonography (2,500 persons) or colonoscopy (5,000 persons) screening. Those invited for colonoscopy screening will be randomized to a prior consultation either by telephone or a visit at the outpatient clinic. All CT colonography invitees will have a prior consultation by telephone. Invitees are instructed to consult their general practitioner and not to participate in screening if they have symptoms suggestive for CRC. After providing informed consent, participants will be scheduled for the screening procedure. The primary outcome measure of this study is the participation rate. Secondary outcomes are the diagnostic yield, the expected and perceived burden of the screening test, level of informed choice and cost-effectiveness of both screening methods. DISCUSSION: This study will provide further evidence to enable decision making in population screening for colorectal cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch trial register: NTR1829 BioMed Central 2010-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC2889851/ /pubmed/20482825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-10-47 Text en Copyright ©2010 de Wijkerslooth et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol de Wijkerslooth, Thomas R de Haan, Margriet C Stoop, Esther M Deutekom, Marije Fockens, Paul Bossuyt, Patrick MM Thomeer, Maarten van Ballegooijen, Marjolein Essink-Bot, Marie-Louise van Leerdam, Monique E Kuipers, Ernst J Dekker, Evelien Stoker, Jaap Study protocol: population screening for colorectal cancer by colonoscopy or CT colonography: a randomized controlled trial |
title | Study protocol: population screening for colorectal cancer by colonoscopy or CT colonography: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Study protocol: population screening for colorectal cancer by colonoscopy or CT colonography: a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Study protocol: population screening for colorectal cancer by colonoscopy or CT colonography: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Study protocol: population screening for colorectal cancer by colonoscopy or CT colonography: a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Study protocol: population screening for colorectal cancer by colonoscopy or CT colonography: a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | study protocol: population screening for colorectal cancer by colonoscopy or ct colonography: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2889851/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20482825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-10-47 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dewijkerslooththomasr studyprotocolpopulationscreeningforcolorectalcancerbycolonoscopyorctcolonographyarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT dehaanmargrietc studyprotocolpopulationscreeningforcolorectalcancerbycolonoscopyorctcolonographyarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT stoopestherm studyprotocolpopulationscreeningforcolorectalcancerbycolonoscopyorctcolonographyarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT deutekommarije studyprotocolpopulationscreeningforcolorectalcancerbycolonoscopyorctcolonographyarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT fockenspaul studyprotocolpopulationscreeningforcolorectalcancerbycolonoscopyorctcolonographyarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT bossuytpatrickmm studyprotocolpopulationscreeningforcolorectalcancerbycolonoscopyorctcolonographyarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT thomeermaarten studyprotocolpopulationscreeningforcolorectalcancerbycolonoscopyorctcolonographyarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vanballegooijenmarjolein studyprotocolpopulationscreeningforcolorectalcancerbycolonoscopyorctcolonographyarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT essinkbotmarielouise studyprotocolpopulationscreeningforcolorectalcancerbycolonoscopyorctcolonographyarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vanleerdammoniquee studyprotocolpopulationscreeningforcolorectalcancerbycolonoscopyorctcolonographyarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kuipersernstj studyprotocolpopulationscreeningforcolorectalcancerbycolonoscopyorctcolonographyarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT dekkerevelien studyprotocolpopulationscreeningforcolorectalcancerbycolonoscopyorctcolonographyarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT stokerjaap studyprotocolpopulationscreeningforcolorectalcancerbycolonoscopyorctcolonographyarandomizedcontrolledtrial |