Cargando…

Study protocol: population screening for colorectal cancer by colonoscopy or CT colonography: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most prevalent type of cancer in Europe. Early detection and removal of CRC or its precursor lesions by population screening can reduce mortality. Colonoscopy and computed tomography colonography (CT colonography) are highly accurate exams and screen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Wijkerslooth, Thomas R, de Haan, Margriet C, Stoop, Esther M, Deutekom, Marije, Fockens, Paul, Bossuyt, Patrick MM, Thomeer, Maarten, van Ballegooijen, Marjolein, Essink-Bot, Marie-Louise, van Leerdam, Monique E, Kuipers, Ernst J, Dekker, Evelien, Stoker, Jaap
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2889851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20482825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-10-47
_version_ 1782182724218388480
author de Wijkerslooth, Thomas R
de Haan, Margriet C
Stoop, Esther M
Deutekom, Marije
Fockens, Paul
Bossuyt, Patrick MM
Thomeer, Maarten
van Ballegooijen, Marjolein
Essink-Bot, Marie-Louise
van Leerdam, Monique E
Kuipers, Ernst J
Dekker, Evelien
Stoker, Jaap
author_facet de Wijkerslooth, Thomas R
de Haan, Margriet C
Stoop, Esther M
Deutekom, Marije
Fockens, Paul
Bossuyt, Patrick MM
Thomeer, Maarten
van Ballegooijen, Marjolein
Essink-Bot, Marie-Louise
van Leerdam, Monique E
Kuipers, Ernst J
Dekker, Evelien
Stoker, Jaap
author_sort de Wijkerslooth, Thomas R
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most prevalent type of cancer in Europe. Early detection and removal of CRC or its precursor lesions by population screening can reduce mortality. Colonoscopy and computed tomography colonography (CT colonography) are highly accurate exams and screening options that examine the entire colon. The success of screening depends on the participation rate. We designed a randomized trial to compare the uptake, yield and costs of direct colonoscopy population screening, using either a telephone consultation or a consultation at the outpatient clinic, versus CT colonography first, with colonoscopy in CT colonography positives. METHODS AND DESIGN: 7,500 persons between 50 and 75 years will be randomly selected from the electronic database of the municipal administration registration and will receive an invitation to participate in either CT colonography (2,500 persons) or colonoscopy (5,000 persons) screening. Those invited for colonoscopy screening will be randomized to a prior consultation either by telephone or a visit at the outpatient clinic. All CT colonography invitees will have a prior consultation by telephone. Invitees are instructed to consult their general practitioner and not to participate in screening if they have symptoms suggestive for CRC. After providing informed consent, participants will be scheduled for the screening procedure. The primary outcome measure of this study is the participation rate. Secondary outcomes are the diagnostic yield, the expected and perceived burden of the screening test, level of informed choice and cost-effectiveness of both screening methods. DISCUSSION: This study will provide further evidence to enable decision making in population screening for colorectal cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch trial register: NTR1829
format Text
id pubmed-2889851
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28898512010-06-23 Study protocol: population screening for colorectal cancer by colonoscopy or CT colonography: a randomized controlled trial de Wijkerslooth, Thomas R de Haan, Margriet C Stoop, Esther M Deutekom, Marije Fockens, Paul Bossuyt, Patrick MM Thomeer, Maarten van Ballegooijen, Marjolein Essink-Bot, Marie-Louise van Leerdam, Monique E Kuipers, Ernst J Dekker, Evelien Stoker, Jaap BMC Gastroenterol Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most prevalent type of cancer in Europe. Early detection and removal of CRC or its precursor lesions by population screening can reduce mortality. Colonoscopy and computed tomography colonography (CT colonography) are highly accurate exams and screening options that examine the entire colon. The success of screening depends on the participation rate. We designed a randomized trial to compare the uptake, yield and costs of direct colonoscopy population screening, using either a telephone consultation or a consultation at the outpatient clinic, versus CT colonography first, with colonoscopy in CT colonography positives. METHODS AND DESIGN: 7,500 persons between 50 and 75 years will be randomly selected from the electronic database of the municipal administration registration and will receive an invitation to participate in either CT colonography (2,500 persons) or colonoscopy (5,000 persons) screening. Those invited for colonoscopy screening will be randomized to a prior consultation either by telephone or a visit at the outpatient clinic. All CT colonography invitees will have a prior consultation by telephone. Invitees are instructed to consult their general practitioner and not to participate in screening if they have symptoms suggestive for CRC. After providing informed consent, participants will be scheduled for the screening procedure. The primary outcome measure of this study is the participation rate. Secondary outcomes are the diagnostic yield, the expected and perceived burden of the screening test, level of informed choice and cost-effectiveness of both screening methods. DISCUSSION: This study will provide further evidence to enable decision making in population screening for colorectal cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch trial register: NTR1829 BioMed Central 2010-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC2889851/ /pubmed/20482825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-10-47 Text en Copyright ©2010 de Wijkerslooth et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
de Wijkerslooth, Thomas R
de Haan, Margriet C
Stoop, Esther M
Deutekom, Marije
Fockens, Paul
Bossuyt, Patrick MM
Thomeer, Maarten
van Ballegooijen, Marjolein
Essink-Bot, Marie-Louise
van Leerdam, Monique E
Kuipers, Ernst J
Dekker, Evelien
Stoker, Jaap
Study protocol: population screening for colorectal cancer by colonoscopy or CT colonography: a randomized controlled trial
title Study protocol: population screening for colorectal cancer by colonoscopy or CT colonography: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Study protocol: population screening for colorectal cancer by colonoscopy or CT colonography: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Study protocol: population screening for colorectal cancer by colonoscopy or CT colonography: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Study protocol: population screening for colorectal cancer by colonoscopy or CT colonography: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Study protocol: population screening for colorectal cancer by colonoscopy or CT colonography: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort study protocol: population screening for colorectal cancer by colonoscopy or ct colonography: a randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2889851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20482825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-10-47
work_keys_str_mv AT dewijkerslooththomasr studyprotocolpopulationscreeningforcolorectalcancerbycolonoscopyorctcolonographyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT dehaanmargrietc studyprotocolpopulationscreeningforcolorectalcancerbycolonoscopyorctcolonographyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT stoopestherm studyprotocolpopulationscreeningforcolorectalcancerbycolonoscopyorctcolonographyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT deutekommarije studyprotocolpopulationscreeningforcolorectalcancerbycolonoscopyorctcolonographyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT fockenspaul studyprotocolpopulationscreeningforcolorectalcancerbycolonoscopyorctcolonographyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bossuytpatrickmm studyprotocolpopulationscreeningforcolorectalcancerbycolonoscopyorctcolonographyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT thomeermaarten studyprotocolpopulationscreeningforcolorectalcancerbycolonoscopyorctcolonographyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vanballegooijenmarjolein studyprotocolpopulationscreeningforcolorectalcancerbycolonoscopyorctcolonographyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT essinkbotmarielouise studyprotocolpopulationscreeningforcolorectalcancerbycolonoscopyorctcolonographyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vanleerdammoniquee studyprotocolpopulationscreeningforcolorectalcancerbycolonoscopyorctcolonographyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kuipersernstj studyprotocolpopulationscreeningforcolorectalcancerbycolonoscopyorctcolonographyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT dekkerevelien studyprotocolpopulationscreeningforcolorectalcancerbycolonoscopyorctcolonographyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT stokerjaap studyprotocolpopulationscreeningforcolorectalcancerbycolonoscopyorctcolonographyarandomizedcontrolledtrial