Cargando…

Hospital costs of central line-associated bloodstream infections and cost-effectiveness of closed vs. open infusion containers. The case of Intensive Care Units in Italy

OBJECTIVES: The aim was to evaluate direct health care costs of central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) and to calculate the cost-effectiveness ratio of closed fully collapsible plastic intravenous infusion containers vs. open (glass) infusion containers. METHODS: A two-year, prospec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tarricone, Rosanna, Torbica, Aleksandra, Franzetti, Fabio, Rosenthal, Victor D
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2889855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20459753
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-8-8
_version_ 1782182725136941056
author Tarricone, Rosanna
Torbica, Aleksandra
Franzetti, Fabio
Rosenthal, Victor D
author_facet Tarricone, Rosanna
Torbica, Aleksandra
Franzetti, Fabio
Rosenthal, Victor D
author_sort Tarricone, Rosanna
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim was to evaluate direct health care costs of central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) and to calculate the cost-effectiveness ratio of closed fully collapsible plastic intravenous infusion containers vs. open (glass) infusion containers. METHODS: A two-year, prospective case-control study was undertaken in four intensive care units in an Italian teaching hospital. Patients with CLABSI (cases) and patients without CLABSI (controls) were matched for admission departments, gender, age, and average severity of illness score. Costs were estimated according to micro-costing approach. In the cost effectiveness analysis, the cost component was assessed as the difference between production costs while effectiveness was measured by CLABSI rate (number of CLABSI per 1000 central line days) associated with the two infusion containers. RESULTS: A total of 43 cases of CLABSI were compared with 97 matched controls. The mean age of cases and controls was 62.1 and 66.6 years, respectively (p = 0.143); 56% of the cases and 57% of the controls were females (p = 0.922). The mean length of stay of cases and controls was 17.41 and 8.55 days, respectively (p < 0.001). Overall, the mean total costs of patients with and without CLABSI were € 18,241 and € 9,087, respectively (p < 0.001). On average, the extra cost for drugs was € 843 (p < 0.001), for supplies € 133 (p = 0.116), for lab tests € 171 (p < 0.001), and for specialist visits € 15 (p = 0.019). The mean extra cost for hospital stay (overhead) was € 7,180 (p < 0.001). The closed infusion container was a dominant strategy. It resulted in lower CLABSI rates (3.5 vs. 8.2 CLABSIs per 1000 central line days for closed vs. open infusion container) without any significant difference in total production costs. The higher acquisition cost of the closed infusion container was offset by savings incurred in other phases of production, especially waste management. CONCLUSIONS: CLABSI results in considerable and significant increase in utilization of hospital resources. Use of innovative technologies such as closed infusion containers can significantly reduce the incidence of healthcare acquired infection without posing additional burden on hospital budgets.
format Text
id pubmed-2889855
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28898552010-06-23 Hospital costs of central line-associated bloodstream infections and cost-effectiveness of closed vs. open infusion containers. The case of Intensive Care Units in Italy Tarricone, Rosanna Torbica, Aleksandra Franzetti, Fabio Rosenthal, Victor D Cost Eff Resour Alloc Research OBJECTIVES: The aim was to evaluate direct health care costs of central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) and to calculate the cost-effectiveness ratio of closed fully collapsible plastic intravenous infusion containers vs. open (glass) infusion containers. METHODS: A two-year, prospective case-control study was undertaken in four intensive care units in an Italian teaching hospital. Patients with CLABSI (cases) and patients without CLABSI (controls) were matched for admission departments, gender, age, and average severity of illness score. Costs were estimated according to micro-costing approach. In the cost effectiveness analysis, the cost component was assessed as the difference between production costs while effectiveness was measured by CLABSI rate (number of CLABSI per 1000 central line days) associated with the two infusion containers. RESULTS: A total of 43 cases of CLABSI were compared with 97 matched controls. The mean age of cases and controls was 62.1 and 66.6 years, respectively (p = 0.143); 56% of the cases and 57% of the controls were females (p = 0.922). The mean length of stay of cases and controls was 17.41 and 8.55 days, respectively (p < 0.001). Overall, the mean total costs of patients with and without CLABSI were € 18,241 and € 9,087, respectively (p < 0.001). On average, the extra cost for drugs was € 843 (p < 0.001), for supplies € 133 (p = 0.116), for lab tests € 171 (p < 0.001), and for specialist visits € 15 (p = 0.019). The mean extra cost for hospital stay (overhead) was € 7,180 (p < 0.001). The closed infusion container was a dominant strategy. It resulted in lower CLABSI rates (3.5 vs. 8.2 CLABSIs per 1000 central line days for closed vs. open infusion container) without any significant difference in total production costs. The higher acquisition cost of the closed infusion container was offset by savings incurred in other phases of production, especially waste management. CONCLUSIONS: CLABSI results in considerable and significant increase in utilization of hospital resources. Use of innovative technologies such as closed infusion containers can significantly reduce the incidence of healthcare acquired infection without posing additional burden on hospital budgets. BioMed Central 2010-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC2889855/ /pubmed/20459753 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-8-8 Text en Copyright ©2010 Tarricone et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Tarricone, Rosanna
Torbica, Aleksandra
Franzetti, Fabio
Rosenthal, Victor D
Hospital costs of central line-associated bloodstream infections and cost-effectiveness of closed vs. open infusion containers. The case of Intensive Care Units in Italy
title Hospital costs of central line-associated bloodstream infections and cost-effectiveness of closed vs. open infusion containers. The case of Intensive Care Units in Italy
title_full Hospital costs of central line-associated bloodstream infections and cost-effectiveness of closed vs. open infusion containers. The case of Intensive Care Units in Italy
title_fullStr Hospital costs of central line-associated bloodstream infections and cost-effectiveness of closed vs. open infusion containers. The case of Intensive Care Units in Italy
title_full_unstemmed Hospital costs of central line-associated bloodstream infections and cost-effectiveness of closed vs. open infusion containers. The case of Intensive Care Units in Italy
title_short Hospital costs of central line-associated bloodstream infections and cost-effectiveness of closed vs. open infusion containers. The case of Intensive Care Units in Italy
title_sort hospital costs of central line-associated bloodstream infections and cost-effectiveness of closed vs. open infusion containers. the case of intensive care units in italy
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2889855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20459753
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-8-8
work_keys_str_mv AT tarriconerosanna hospitalcostsofcentrallineassociatedbloodstreaminfectionsandcosteffectivenessofclosedvsopeninfusioncontainersthecaseofintensivecareunitsinitaly
AT torbicaaleksandra hospitalcostsofcentrallineassociatedbloodstreaminfectionsandcosteffectivenessofclosedvsopeninfusioncontainersthecaseofintensivecareunitsinitaly
AT franzettifabio hospitalcostsofcentrallineassociatedbloodstreaminfectionsandcosteffectivenessofclosedvsopeninfusioncontainersthecaseofintensivecareunitsinitaly
AT rosenthalvictord hospitalcostsofcentrallineassociatedbloodstreaminfectionsandcosteffectivenessofclosedvsopeninfusioncontainersthecaseofintensivecareunitsinitaly