Cargando…

Escherichia coli phylogenetic group determination and its application in the identification of the major animal source of fecal contamination

BACKGROUND: Escherichia coli strains are commonly found in the gut microflora of warm-blooded animals. These strains can be assigned to one of the four main phylogenetic groups, A, B1, B2 and D, which can be divided into seven subgroups (A(0), A(1), B1, B2(2), B2(3), D(1 )and D(2)), according to the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carlos, Camila, Pires, Mathias M, Stoppe, Nancy C, Hachich, Elayse M, Sato, Maria IZ, Gomes, Tânia AT, Amaral, Luiz A, Ottoboni, Laura MM
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2889953/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20515490
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-10-161
_version_ 1782182743691493376
author Carlos, Camila
Pires, Mathias M
Stoppe, Nancy C
Hachich, Elayse M
Sato, Maria IZ
Gomes, Tânia AT
Amaral, Luiz A
Ottoboni, Laura MM
author_facet Carlos, Camila
Pires, Mathias M
Stoppe, Nancy C
Hachich, Elayse M
Sato, Maria IZ
Gomes, Tânia AT
Amaral, Luiz A
Ottoboni, Laura MM
author_sort Carlos, Camila
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Escherichia coli strains are commonly found in the gut microflora of warm-blooded animals. These strains can be assigned to one of the four main phylogenetic groups, A, B1, B2 and D, which can be divided into seven subgroups (A(0), A(1), B1, B2(2), B2(3), D(1 )and D(2)), according to the combination of the three genetic markers chuA, yjaA and DNA fragment TspE4.C2. Distinct studies have demonstrated that these phylo-groups differ in the presence of virulence factors, ecological niches and life-history. Therefore, the aim of this work was to analyze the distribution of these E. coli phylo-groups in 94 human strains, 13 chicken strains, 50 cow strains, 16 goat strains, 39 pig strains and 29 sheep strains and to verify the potential of this analysis to investigate the source of fecal contamination. RESULTS: The results indicated that the distribution of phylogenetic groups, subgroups and genetic markers is non-random in the hosts analyzed. Strains from group B1 were present in all hosts analyzed but were more prevalent in cow, goat and sheep samples. Subgroup B2(3 )was only found in human samples. The diversity and the similarity indexes have indicated a similarity between the E. coli population structure of human and pig samples and among cow, goat and sheep samples. Correspondence analysis using contingence tables of subgroups, groups and genetic markers frequencies allowed the visualization of the differences among animal samples and the identification of the animal source of an external validation set. The classifier tools Binary logistic regression and Partial least square -- discriminant analysis, using the genetic markers profile of the strains, differentiated the herbivorous from the omnivorous strains, with an average error rate of 17%. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first work, as far as we are aware, that identifies the major source of fecal contamination of a pool of strains instead of a unique strain. We concluded that the analysis of the E. coli population structure can be useful as a supplementary bacterial source tracking tool.
format Text
id pubmed-2889953
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28899532010-06-23 Escherichia coli phylogenetic group determination and its application in the identification of the major animal source of fecal contamination Carlos, Camila Pires, Mathias M Stoppe, Nancy C Hachich, Elayse M Sato, Maria IZ Gomes, Tânia AT Amaral, Luiz A Ottoboni, Laura MM BMC Microbiol Research article BACKGROUND: Escherichia coli strains are commonly found in the gut microflora of warm-blooded animals. These strains can be assigned to one of the four main phylogenetic groups, A, B1, B2 and D, which can be divided into seven subgroups (A(0), A(1), B1, B2(2), B2(3), D(1 )and D(2)), according to the combination of the three genetic markers chuA, yjaA and DNA fragment TspE4.C2. Distinct studies have demonstrated that these phylo-groups differ in the presence of virulence factors, ecological niches and life-history. Therefore, the aim of this work was to analyze the distribution of these E. coli phylo-groups in 94 human strains, 13 chicken strains, 50 cow strains, 16 goat strains, 39 pig strains and 29 sheep strains and to verify the potential of this analysis to investigate the source of fecal contamination. RESULTS: The results indicated that the distribution of phylogenetic groups, subgroups and genetic markers is non-random in the hosts analyzed. Strains from group B1 were present in all hosts analyzed but were more prevalent in cow, goat and sheep samples. Subgroup B2(3 )was only found in human samples. The diversity and the similarity indexes have indicated a similarity between the E. coli population structure of human and pig samples and among cow, goat and sheep samples. Correspondence analysis using contingence tables of subgroups, groups and genetic markers frequencies allowed the visualization of the differences among animal samples and the identification of the animal source of an external validation set. The classifier tools Binary logistic regression and Partial least square -- discriminant analysis, using the genetic markers profile of the strains, differentiated the herbivorous from the omnivorous strains, with an average error rate of 17%. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first work, as far as we are aware, that identifies the major source of fecal contamination of a pool of strains instead of a unique strain. We concluded that the analysis of the E. coli population structure can be useful as a supplementary bacterial source tracking tool. BioMed Central 2010-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2889953/ /pubmed/20515490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-10-161 Text en Copyright ©2010 Carlos et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research article
Carlos, Camila
Pires, Mathias M
Stoppe, Nancy C
Hachich, Elayse M
Sato, Maria IZ
Gomes, Tânia AT
Amaral, Luiz A
Ottoboni, Laura MM
Escherichia coli phylogenetic group determination and its application in the identification of the major animal source of fecal contamination
title Escherichia coli phylogenetic group determination and its application in the identification of the major animal source of fecal contamination
title_full Escherichia coli phylogenetic group determination and its application in the identification of the major animal source of fecal contamination
title_fullStr Escherichia coli phylogenetic group determination and its application in the identification of the major animal source of fecal contamination
title_full_unstemmed Escherichia coli phylogenetic group determination and its application in the identification of the major animal source of fecal contamination
title_short Escherichia coli phylogenetic group determination and its application in the identification of the major animal source of fecal contamination
title_sort escherichia coli phylogenetic group determination and its application in the identification of the major animal source of fecal contamination
topic Research article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2889953/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20515490
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-10-161
work_keys_str_mv AT carloscamila escherichiacoliphylogeneticgroupdeterminationanditsapplicationintheidentificationofthemajoranimalsourceoffecalcontamination
AT piresmathiasm escherichiacoliphylogeneticgroupdeterminationanditsapplicationintheidentificationofthemajoranimalsourceoffecalcontamination
AT stoppenancyc escherichiacoliphylogeneticgroupdeterminationanditsapplicationintheidentificationofthemajoranimalsourceoffecalcontamination
AT hachichelaysem escherichiacoliphylogeneticgroupdeterminationanditsapplicationintheidentificationofthemajoranimalsourceoffecalcontamination
AT satomariaiz escherichiacoliphylogeneticgroupdeterminationanditsapplicationintheidentificationofthemajoranimalsourceoffecalcontamination
AT gomestaniaat escherichiacoliphylogeneticgroupdeterminationanditsapplicationintheidentificationofthemajoranimalsourceoffecalcontamination
AT amaralluiza escherichiacoliphylogeneticgroupdeterminationanditsapplicationintheidentificationofthemajoranimalsourceoffecalcontamination
AT ottobonilauramm escherichiacoliphylogeneticgroupdeterminationanditsapplicationintheidentificationofthemajoranimalsourceoffecalcontamination