Cargando…

Prospective randomized trial evaluating mandatory second look surgery with HIPEC and CRS vs. standard of care in patients at high risk of developing colorectal peritoneal metastases

BACKGROUND: The standard of care for colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis is evolving from chemotherapy to cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for patients with disease limited to the peritoneum. Peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer treated...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ripley, Robert T, Davis, Jeremy L, Kemp, Clinton D, Steinberg, Seth M, Toomey, Mary Ann, Avital, Itzhak
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2889988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20500867
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-11-62
_version_ 1782182744865898496
author Ripley, Robert T
Davis, Jeremy L
Kemp, Clinton D
Steinberg, Seth M
Toomey, Mary Ann
Avital, Itzhak
author_facet Ripley, Robert T
Davis, Jeremy L
Kemp, Clinton D
Steinberg, Seth M
Toomey, Mary Ann
Avital, Itzhak
author_sort Ripley, Robert T
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The standard of care for colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis is evolving from chemotherapy to cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for patients with disease limited to the peritoneum. Peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer treated with chemotherapy alone results in median survival of 5 to 13 months, whereas CRS with HIPEC for early peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer resulted in median survival of 48-63 months and 5 year survival of 51%. Completeness of cytoreduction and limited disease are associated with longer survival, yet early peritoneal carcinomatosis is undetectable by conventional imaging. Exploratory laparotomy can successfully identify early disease, but this approach can only be justified in patients with high risk of peritoneal carcinomatosis. Historical data indicates that patients presenting with synchronous peritoneal carcinomatosis, ovarian metastases, perforated primary tumor, and emergency presentation with bleeding or obstructing lesions are at high risk of peritoneal carcinomatosis. Approximately 55% of these patient populations will develop peritoneal carcinomatosis. We hypothesize that performing a mandatory second look laparotomy with CRS and HIPEC for patients who are at high risk for developing peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer will lead to improved survival as compared to patients who receive standard of care with routine surveillance. METHODS/DESIGN: This study is a prospective randomized trial designed to answer the question whether mandatory second look surgery with CRS and HIPEC will prolong overall survival compared to the standard of care in patients who are at high risk for developing peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer (CRC). Patients with CRC at high risk for developing peritoneal carcinomatosis who underwent curative surgery and subsequently received standard of care adjuvant chemotherapy will be evaluated. The patients who remain without evidence of disease by imaging, physical examination, and tumor markers for 12 months after the primary operation will be randomized to mandatory second look surgery or standard-of-care surveillance. At laparotomy, CRS and HIPEC will be performed with intraperitoneal oxaliplatin with concurrent systemic 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin. Up to 100 patients will be enrolled to allow for 35 evaluable patients in each arm; accrual is expected to last 5 years. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT01095523
format Text
id pubmed-2889988
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28899882010-06-23 Prospective randomized trial evaluating mandatory second look surgery with HIPEC and CRS vs. standard of care in patients at high risk of developing colorectal peritoneal metastases Ripley, Robert T Davis, Jeremy L Kemp, Clinton D Steinberg, Seth M Toomey, Mary Ann Avital, Itzhak Trials Study protocol BACKGROUND: The standard of care for colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis is evolving from chemotherapy to cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for patients with disease limited to the peritoneum. Peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer treated with chemotherapy alone results in median survival of 5 to 13 months, whereas CRS with HIPEC for early peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer resulted in median survival of 48-63 months and 5 year survival of 51%. Completeness of cytoreduction and limited disease are associated with longer survival, yet early peritoneal carcinomatosis is undetectable by conventional imaging. Exploratory laparotomy can successfully identify early disease, but this approach can only be justified in patients with high risk of peritoneal carcinomatosis. Historical data indicates that patients presenting with synchronous peritoneal carcinomatosis, ovarian metastases, perforated primary tumor, and emergency presentation with bleeding or obstructing lesions are at high risk of peritoneal carcinomatosis. Approximately 55% of these patient populations will develop peritoneal carcinomatosis. We hypothesize that performing a mandatory second look laparotomy with CRS and HIPEC for patients who are at high risk for developing peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer will lead to improved survival as compared to patients who receive standard of care with routine surveillance. METHODS/DESIGN: This study is a prospective randomized trial designed to answer the question whether mandatory second look surgery with CRS and HIPEC will prolong overall survival compared to the standard of care in patients who are at high risk for developing peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer (CRC). Patients with CRC at high risk for developing peritoneal carcinomatosis who underwent curative surgery and subsequently received standard of care adjuvant chemotherapy will be evaluated. The patients who remain without evidence of disease by imaging, physical examination, and tumor markers for 12 months after the primary operation will be randomized to mandatory second look surgery or standard-of-care surveillance. At laparotomy, CRS and HIPEC will be performed with intraperitoneal oxaliplatin with concurrent systemic 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin. Up to 100 patients will be enrolled to allow for 35 evaluable patients in each arm; accrual is expected to last 5 years. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT01095523 BioMed Central 2010-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC2889988/ /pubmed/20500867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-11-62 Text en Copyright ©2010 Ripley et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study protocol
Ripley, Robert T
Davis, Jeremy L
Kemp, Clinton D
Steinberg, Seth M
Toomey, Mary Ann
Avital, Itzhak
Prospective randomized trial evaluating mandatory second look surgery with HIPEC and CRS vs. standard of care in patients at high risk of developing colorectal peritoneal metastases
title Prospective randomized trial evaluating mandatory second look surgery with HIPEC and CRS vs. standard of care in patients at high risk of developing colorectal peritoneal metastases
title_full Prospective randomized trial evaluating mandatory second look surgery with HIPEC and CRS vs. standard of care in patients at high risk of developing colorectal peritoneal metastases
title_fullStr Prospective randomized trial evaluating mandatory second look surgery with HIPEC and CRS vs. standard of care in patients at high risk of developing colorectal peritoneal metastases
title_full_unstemmed Prospective randomized trial evaluating mandatory second look surgery with HIPEC and CRS vs. standard of care in patients at high risk of developing colorectal peritoneal metastases
title_short Prospective randomized trial evaluating mandatory second look surgery with HIPEC and CRS vs. standard of care in patients at high risk of developing colorectal peritoneal metastases
title_sort prospective randomized trial evaluating mandatory second look surgery with hipec and crs vs. standard of care in patients at high risk of developing colorectal peritoneal metastases
topic Study protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2889988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20500867
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-11-62
work_keys_str_mv AT ripleyrobertt prospectiverandomizedtrialevaluatingmandatorysecondlooksurgerywithhipecandcrsvsstandardofcareinpatientsathighriskofdevelopingcolorectalperitonealmetastases
AT davisjeremyl prospectiverandomizedtrialevaluatingmandatorysecondlooksurgerywithhipecandcrsvsstandardofcareinpatientsathighriskofdevelopingcolorectalperitonealmetastases
AT kempclintond prospectiverandomizedtrialevaluatingmandatorysecondlooksurgerywithhipecandcrsvsstandardofcareinpatientsathighriskofdevelopingcolorectalperitonealmetastases
AT steinbergsethm prospectiverandomizedtrialevaluatingmandatorysecondlooksurgerywithhipecandcrsvsstandardofcareinpatientsathighriskofdevelopingcolorectalperitonealmetastases
AT toomeymaryann prospectiverandomizedtrialevaluatingmandatorysecondlooksurgerywithhipecandcrsvsstandardofcareinpatientsathighriskofdevelopingcolorectalperitonealmetastases
AT avitalitzhak prospectiverandomizedtrialevaluatingmandatorysecondlooksurgerywithhipecandcrsvsstandardofcareinpatientsathighriskofdevelopingcolorectalperitonealmetastases