Cargando…
Role of Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in the Treatment of Bladder Cancer: A Mini Review
Although radical cystectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is the standard treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer, the optimal extent of PLND and the minimum number of nodes that should be examined for pathology remain unclear. However, evidence is growing that extended PLND has addi...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Urological Association
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2890052/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20577602 http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/kju.2010.51.6.371 |
_version_ | 1782182754014724096 |
---|---|
author | Ku, Ja Hyeon |
author_facet | Ku, Ja Hyeon |
author_sort | Ku, Ja Hyeon |
collection | PubMed |
description | Although radical cystectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is the standard treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer, the optimal extent of PLND and the minimum number of nodes that should be examined for pathology remain unclear. However, evidence is growing that extended PLND has additional diagnostic and therapeutic benefits relative to standard PLND. In particular, a more meticulous and extended PLND may improve the disease-free survival of node-negative patients because it removes undetected micrometastases. Indeed, some patients with positive nodes can be cured by surgery alone, even those with gross adenopathy. Increasing lines of evidence also suggest that the extent of the primary bladder tumor, the number of lymph nodes that are removed, and the lymph node tumor burden are important prognostic variables in patients undergoing cystectomy. Therefore, extended PLND may not only provide improved prognostic information, it may also have a clinically significant therapeutic benefit for both lymph node-positive and node-negative patients undergoing radical cystectomy. Although the absolute limits of PLND remain to be determined, evidence supports the notion that a more extended PLND should include the common iliac vessels and presacral lymph nodes at cystectomy. Such PLND should only be performed in patients who are appropriate surgical candidates. Prospective, randomized trials are needed to properly establish the extent of PLND that is required to generate these benefits. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2890052 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | The Korean Urological Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28900522010-06-24 Role of Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in the Treatment of Bladder Cancer: A Mini Review Ku, Ja Hyeon Korean J Urol Review Article Although radical cystectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is the standard treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer, the optimal extent of PLND and the minimum number of nodes that should be examined for pathology remain unclear. However, evidence is growing that extended PLND has additional diagnostic and therapeutic benefits relative to standard PLND. In particular, a more meticulous and extended PLND may improve the disease-free survival of node-negative patients because it removes undetected micrometastases. Indeed, some patients with positive nodes can be cured by surgery alone, even those with gross adenopathy. Increasing lines of evidence also suggest that the extent of the primary bladder tumor, the number of lymph nodes that are removed, and the lymph node tumor burden are important prognostic variables in patients undergoing cystectomy. Therefore, extended PLND may not only provide improved prognostic information, it may also have a clinically significant therapeutic benefit for both lymph node-positive and node-negative patients undergoing radical cystectomy. Although the absolute limits of PLND remain to be determined, evidence supports the notion that a more extended PLND should include the common iliac vessels and presacral lymph nodes at cystectomy. Such PLND should only be performed in patients who are appropriate surgical candidates. Prospective, randomized trials are needed to properly establish the extent of PLND that is required to generate these benefits. The Korean Urological Association 2010-06 2010-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC2890052/ /pubmed/20577602 http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/kju.2010.51.6.371 Text en Copyright © The Korean Urological Association, 2010 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Ku, Ja Hyeon Role of Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in the Treatment of Bladder Cancer: A Mini Review |
title | Role of Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in the Treatment of Bladder Cancer: A Mini Review |
title_full | Role of Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in the Treatment of Bladder Cancer: A Mini Review |
title_fullStr | Role of Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in the Treatment of Bladder Cancer: A Mini Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Role of Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in the Treatment of Bladder Cancer: A Mini Review |
title_short | Role of Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in the Treatment of Bladder Cancer: A Mini Review |
title_sort | role of pelvic lymphadenectomy in the treatment of bladder cancer: a mini review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2890052/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20577602 http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/kju.2010.51.6.371 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kujahyeon roleofpelviclymphadenectomyinthetreatmentofbladdercanceraminireview |