Cargando…

Interventions With Adherence-Promoting Components in Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes: Meta-analysis of their impact on glycemic control

OBJECTIVE: To review interventions with adherence-promoting components and document their impact on glycemic control via meta-analysis. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Data from 15 studies that met the following criteria were subjected to meta-analysis: 1) randomized, controlled trial, 2) study sample...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hood, Korey K., Rohan, Jennifer M., Peterson, Claire M., Drotar, Dennis
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Diabetes Association 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2890378/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20587726
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc09-2268
_version_ 1782182782983733248
author Hood, Korey K.
Rohan, Jennifer M.
Peterson, Claire M.
Drotar, Dennis
author_facet Hood, Korey K.
Rohan, Jennifer M.
Peterson, Claire M.
Drotar, Dennis
author_sort Hood, Korey K.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To review interventions with adherence-promoting components and document their impact on glycemic control via meta-analysis. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Data from 15 studies that met the following criteria were subjected to meta-analysis: 1) randomized, controlled trial, 2) study sample included youth aged <19 years, 3) youth had type 1 diabetes, 4) study reported results on glycemic control; and 5) study reported use of adherence- or self-management–promoting components. RESULTS: The 15 studies included 997 youth with type 1 diabetes. The mean effect size for pre- to posttreatment change for the intervention versus control group comparison was 0.11 (95% CI −0.01 to 0.23). This is a small effect, demonstrating very modest improvements in glycemic control. However, analysis for the pre- to posttreatment effects for the intervention group alone did show significant variability [Q(14) = 33.11; P < 0.05]. Multicomponent interventions, those that targeted emotional, social, or family processes that facilitate diabetes management, were more potent than interventions just targeting a direct, behavioral process (e.g., increase in blood glucose monitoring frequency). CONCLUSIONS: Interventions that focus on direct, behavioral processes and neglect emotional, social, and family processes are unlikely to have an impact on glycemic control; multicomponent interventions showed more robust effects on A1C. Future clinical research should focus on refining interventions and gathering more efficacy and effectiveness data on health outcomes of the pediatric patients treated with these interventions.
format Text
id pubmed-2890378
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher American Diabetes Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28903782011-07-01 Interventions With Adherence-Promoting Components in Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes: Meta-analysis of their impact on glycemic control Hood, Korey K. Rohan, Jennifer M. Peterson, Claire M. Drotar, Dennis Diabetes Care Reviews/Commentaries/ADA Statements OBJECTIVE: To review interventions with adherence-promoting components and document their impact on glycemic control via meta-analysis. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Data from 15 studies that met the following criteria were subjected to meta-analysis: 1) randomized, controlled trial, 2) study sample included youth aged <19 years, 3) youth had type 1 diabetes, 4) study reported results on glycemic control; and 5) study reported use of adherence- or self-management–promoting components. RESULTS: The 15 studies included 997 youth with type 1 diabetes. The mean effect size for pre- to posttreatment change for the intervention versus control group comparison was 0.11 (95% CI −0.01 to 0.23). This is a small effect, demonstrating very modest improvements in glycemic control. However, analysis for the pre- to posttreatment effects for the intervention group alone did show significant variability [Q(14) = 33.11; P < 0.05]. Multicomponent interventions, those that targeted emotional, social, or family processes that facilitate diabetes management, were more potent than interventions just targeting a direct, behavioral process (e.g., increase in blood glucose monitoring frequency). CONCLUSIONS: Interventions that focus on direct, behavioral processes and neglect emotional, social, and family processes are unlikely to have an impact on glycemic control; multicomponent interventions showed more robust effects on A1C. Future clinical research should focus on refining interventions and gathering more efficacy and effectiveness data on health outcomes of the pediatric patients treated with these interventions. American Diabetes Association 2010-07 /pmc/articles/PMC2890378/ /pubmed/20587726 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc09-2268 Text en © 2010 by the American Diabetes Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) for details.
spellingShingle Reviews/Commentaries/ADA Statements
Hood, Korey K.
Rohan, Jennifer M.
Peterson, Claire M.
Drotar, Dennis
Interventions With Adherence-Promoting Components in Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes: Meta-analysis of their impact on glycemic control
title Interventions With Adherence-Promoting Components in Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes: Meta-analysis of their impact on glycemic control
title_full Interventions With Adherence-Promoting Components in Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes: Meta-analysis of their impact on glycemic control
title_fullStr Interventions With Adherence-Promoting Components in Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes: Meta-analysis of their impact on glycemic control
title_full_unstemmed Interventions With Adherence-Promoting Components in Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes: Meta-analysis of their impact on glycemic control
title_short Interventions With Adherence-Promoting Components in Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes: Meta-analysis of their impact on glycemic control
title_sort interventions with adherence-promoting components in pediatric type 1 diabetes: meta-analysis of their impact on glycemic control
topic Reviews/Commentaries/ADA Statements
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2890378/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20587726
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc09-2268
work_keys_str_mv AT hoodkoreyk interventionswithadherencepromotingcomponentsinpediatrictype1diabetesmetaanalysisoftheirimpactonglycemiccontrol
AT rohanjenniferm interventionswithadherencepromotingcomponentsinpediatrictype1diabetesmetaanalysisoftheirimpactonglycemiccontrol
AT petersonclairem interventionswithadherencepromotingcomponentsinpediatrictype1diabetesmetaanalysisoftheirimpactonglycemiccontrol
AT drotardennis interventionswithadherencepromotingcomponentsinpediatrictype1diabetesmetaanalysisoftheirimpactonglycemiccontrol