Cargando…

Validation of an ambulatory cough detection and counting application using voluntary cough under different conditions

BACKGROUND: While cough is an important defence mechanism of the respiratory system, its chronic presence is bothersome and may indicate the presence of a serious disease. We hereby describe the validation process of a novel cough detection and counting technology (PulmoTrack-CC™, KarmelSonix, Haifa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vizel, Eldad, Yigla, Mordechai, Goryachev, Yulia, Dekel, Eyal, Felis, Vered, Levi, Hanna, Kroin, Isaac, Godfrey, Simon, Gavriely, Noam
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2890532/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20504377
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-9974-6-3
_version_ 1782182798648410112
author Vizel, Eldad
Yigla, Mordechai
Goryachev, Yulia
Dekel, Eyal
Felis, Vered
Levi, Hanna
Kroin, Isaac
Godfrey, Simon
Gavriely, Noam
author_facet Vizel, Eldad
Yigla, Mordechai
Goryachev, Yulia
Dekel, Eyal
Felis, Vered
Levi, Hanna
Kroin, Isaac
Godfrey, Simon
Gavriely, Noam
author_sort Vizel, Eldad
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: While cough is an important defence mechanism of the respiratory system, its chronic presence is bothersome and may indicate the presence of a serious disease. We hereby describe the validation process of a novel cough detection and counting technology (PulmoTrack-CC™, KarmelSonix, Haifa, Israel). METHODS: Tracheal and chest wall sounds, ambient sounds and chest motion were digitally recorded, using the PulmoTrack(® )hardware, from healthy volunteers coughing voluntarily while (a) laying supine, (b) sitting, (c) sitting with strong ambient noise, (d) walking, and (e) climbing stairs, a total of 25 minutes per subject. The cough monitoring algorithm was applied to the recorded data to detect and count coughs. The detection algorithm first searches for cough 'candidates' by identifying loud sounds with a cough pattern, followed by a secondary verification process based on detection of specific characteristics of cough. The recorded data were independently and blindly evaluated by trained experts who listened to the sounds and visually reviewed them on a sonogram display. The validation process was based on two methods: (i) Referring to an expert consensus as gold standard, and comparing each cough detected by the algorithm to the expert marking, we marked True and False, positive and negative detections.These values were used to evaluate the specificity and sensitivity of the cough monitoring system. (ii) Counting the number of coughs in longer segments (t = 60 sec, n = 300) and plotting the cough count vs. the corresponding experts' count whereby the linear regression equation, the regression coefficient (R(2)) and the joint-distribution density Bland-Altman plots could be determined. RESULTS: Data were recorded from 12 volunteers undergoing the complete protocol. The overall Specificity for cough events was 94% and the Sensitivity was 96%, with similar values found for all conditions, except for the stair climbing stage where the Specificity was 87% with Sensitivity of 97%. The regression equation between the PulmoTrack-CC™ cough event counts and the Experts' determination was with R(2 )of 0.94. DISCUSSION: This validation scheme provides an objective and quantitative assessment method of a cough counting algorithm in a range of realistic situations that simulate ambulatory monitoring of cough. The ability to detect voluntary coughs under acoustically challenging ambient conditions may represent a useful step towards a clinically applicable automatic cough detector.
format Text
id pubmed-2890532
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28905322010-06-24 Validation of an ambulatory cough detection and counting application using voluntary cough under different conditions Vizel, Eldad Yigla, Mordechai Goryachev, Yulia Dekel, Eyal Felis, Vered Levi, Hanna Kroin, Isaac Godfrey, Simon Gavriely, Noam Cough Methodology BACKGROUND: While cough is an important defence mechanism of the respiratory system, its chronic presence is bothersome and may indicate the presence of a serious disease. We hereby describe the validation process of a novel cough detection and counting technology (PulmoTrack-CC™, KarmelSonix, Haifa, Israel). METHODS: Tracheal and chest wall sounds, ambient sounds and chest motion were digitally recorded, using the PulmoTrack(® )hardware, from healthy volunteers coughing voluntarily while (a) laying supine, (b) sitting, (c) sitting with strong ambient noise, (d) walking, and (e) climbing stairs, a total of 25 minutes per subject. The cough monitoring algorithm was applied to the recorded data to detect and count coughs. The detection algorithm first searches for cough 'candidates' by identifying loud sounds with a cough pattern, followed by a secondary verification process based on detection of specific characteristics of cough. The recorded data were independently and blindly evaluated by trained experts who listened to the sounds and visually reviewed them on a sonogram display. The validation process was based on two methods: (i) Referring to an expert consensus as gold standard, and comparing each cough detected by the algorithm to the expert marking, we marked True and False, positive and negative detections.These values were used to evaluate the specificity and sensitivity of the cough monitoring system. (ii) Counting the number of coughs in longer segments (t = 60 sec, n = 300) and plotting the cough count vs. the corresponding experts' count whereby the linear regression equation, the regression coefficient (R(2)) and the joint-distribution density Bland-Altman plots could be determined. RESULTS: Data were recorded from 12 volunteers undergoing the complete protocol. The overall Specificity for cough events was 94% and the Sensitivity was 96%, with similar values found for all conditions, except for the stair climbing stage where the Specificity was 87% with Sensitivity of 97%. The regression equation between the PulmoTrack-CC™ cough event counts and the Experts' determination was with R(2 )of 0.94. DISCUSSION: This validation scheme provides an objective and quantitative assessment method of a cough counting algorithm in a range of realistic situations that simulate ambulatory monitoring of cough. The ability to detect voluntary coughs under acoustically challenging ambient conditions may represent a useful step towards a clinically applicable automatic cough detector. BioMed Central 2010-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC2890532/ /pubmed/20504377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-9974-6-3 Text en Copyright ©2010 Vizel et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methodology
Vizel, Eldad
Yigla, Mordechai
Goryachev, Yulia
Dekel, Eyal
Felis, Vered
Levi, Hanna
Kroin, Isaac
Godfrey, Simon
Gavriely, Noam
Validation of an ambulatory cough detection and counting application using voluntary cough under different conditions
title Validation of an ambulatory cough detection and counting application using voluntary cough under different conditions
title_full Validation of an ambulatory cough detection and counting application using voluntary cough under different conditions
title_fullStr Validation of an ambulatory cough detection and counting application using voluntary cough under different conditions
title_full_unstemmed Validation of an ambulatory cough detection and counting application using voluntary cough under different conditions
title_short Validation of an ambulatory cough detection and counting application using voluntary cough under different conditions
title_sort validation of an ambulatory cough detection and counting application using voluntary cough under different conditions
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2890532/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20504377
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-9974-6-3
work_keys_str_mv AT vizeleldad validationofanambulatorycoughdetectionandcountingapplicationusingvoluntarycoughunderdifferentconditions
AT yiglamordechai validationofanambulatorycoughdetectionandcountingapplicationusingvoluntarycoughunderdifferentconditions
AT goryachevyulia validationofanambulatorycoughdetectionandcountingapplicationusingvoluntarycoughunderdifferentconditions
AT dekeleyal validationofanambulatorycoughdetectionandcountingapplicationusingvoluntarycoughunderdifferentconditions
AT felisvered validationofanambulatorycoughdetectionandcountingapplicationusingvoluntarycoughunderdifferentconditions
AT levihanna validationofanambulatorycoughdetectionandcountingapplicationusingvoluntarycoughunderdifferentconditions
AT kroinisaac validationofanambulatorycoughdetectionandcountingapplicationusingvoluntarycoughunderdifferentconditions
AT godfreysimon validationofanambulatorycoughdetectionandcountingapplicationusingvoluntarycoughunderdifferentconditions
AT gavrielynoam validationofanambulatorycoughdetectionandcountingapplicationusingvoluntarycoughunderdifferentconditions