Cargando…
A modified formula for calculating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol values
BACKGROUND: The Friedewald formula (FF) is useful for calculating serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) values, but has a remarkable deviation and limitation especially in hypertriglyceridemia. We modify the formula which is now more suitable for LDL-C calculation. METHODS: 2180 cases we...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2890624/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20487572 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-511X-9-52 |
_version_ | 1782182820712546304 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Yunqin Zhang, Xiaojin Pan, Baishen Jin, Xuejuan Yao, Haili Chen, Bin Zou, Yunzeng Ge, Junbo Chen, Haozhu |
author_facet | Chen, Yunqin Zhang, Xiaojin Pan, Baishen Jin, Xuejuan Yao, Haili Chen, Bin Zou, Yunzeng Ge, Junbo Chen, Haozhu |
author_sort | Chen, Yunqin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Friedewald formula (FF) is useful for calculating serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) values, but has a remarkable deviation and limitation especially in hypertriglyceridemia. We modify the formula which is now more suitable for LDL-C calculation. METHODS: 2180 cases were classified into three groups according to their TG concentrations (A: < 200 mg/dl, n = 1220; B: 200-400 mg/dl, n = 480; C: 400-1000 mg/dl, n = 480). The concentrations of LDL-C were measured or estimated by 1) a direct measurement (DM); 2) the FF; and 3) our modified Friedewald formula (MFF): LDL-C (mg/dl) = Non-HDL-C × 90% - TG × 10%. RESULTS: Linear regression showed a significant correlation (P < 0.001) between the measured and calculated LDL-C values. Bland-Altman plots indicated that the methods (DM/MFF) were in better agreement than those (DM/FF). The LDL-C/Non-HDL-C ratio in FF calculated values was significantly lower (P < 0.05) than that in MFF or DM values, while no significant difference between MFF and DM was found. In Group A and Group B, 4.26% and 14.79% of the MFF calculated values had more than 20% deviation from those measured by DM. These percentages were significantly lower than those calculated by FF, where 7.30% and 25.63% were observed, respectively (P < 0.01 and P < 0.001). The MFF calculated values were all positive even in Group C. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the FF calculation, serum LDL-C values estimated by our modified formula are closer to those measured by a direct assay. The modification significantly diminishes the interference caused by hypertriglyceridemia. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2890624 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28906242010-06-24 A modified formula for calculating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol values Chen, Yunqin Zhang, Xiaojin Pan, Baishen Jin, Xuejuan Yao, Haili Chen, Bin Zou, Yunzeng Ge, Junbo Chen, Haozhu Lipids Health Dis Short Paper BACKGROUND: The Friedewald formula (FF) is useful for calculating serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) values, but has a remarkable deviation and limitation especially in hypertriglyceridemia. We modify the formula which is now more suitable for LDL-C calculation. METHODS: 2180 cases were classified into three groups according to their TG concentrations (A: < 200 mg/dl, n = 1220; B: 200-400 mg/dl, n = 480; C: 400-1000 mg/dl, n = 480). The concentrations of LDL-C were measured or estimated by 1) a direct measurement (DM); 2) the FF; and 3) our modified Friedewald formula (MFF): LDL-C (mg/dl) = Non-HDL-C × 90% - TG × 10%. RESULTS: Linear regression showed a significant correlation (P < 0.001) between the measured and calculated LDL-C values. Bland-Altman plots indicated that the methods (DM/MFF) were in better agreement than those (DM/FF). The LDL-C/Non-HDL-C ratio in FF calculated values was significantly lower (P < 0.05) than that in MFF or DM values, while no significant difference between MFF and DM was found. In Group A and Group B, 4.26% and 14.79% of the MFF calculated values had more than 20% deviation from those measured by DM. These percentages were significantly lower than those calculated by FF, where 7.30% and 25.63% were observed, respectively (P < 0.01 and P < 0.001). The MFF calculated values were all positive even in Group C. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the FF calculation, serum LDL-C values estimated by our modified formula are closer to those measured by a direct assay. The modification significantly diminishes the interference caused by hypertriglyceridemia. BioMed Central 2010-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC2890624/ /pubmed/20487572 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-511X-9-52 Text en Copyright ©2010 Chen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Short Paper Chen, Yunqin Zhang, Xiaojin Pan, Baishen Jin, Xuejuan Yao, Haili Chen, Bin Zou, Yunzeng Ge, Junbo Chen, Haozhu A modified formula for calculating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol values |
title | A modified formula for calculating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol values |
title_full | A modified formula for calculating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol values |
title_fullStr | A modified formula for calculating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol values |
title_full_unstemmed | A modified formula for calculating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol values |
title_short | A modified formula for calculating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol values |
title_sort | modified formula for calculating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol values |
topic | Short Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2890624/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20487572 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-511X-9-52 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenyunqin amodifiedformulaforcalculatinglowdensitylipoproteincholesterolvalues AT zhangxiaojin amodifiedformulaforcalculatinglowdensitylipoproteincholesterolvalues AT panbaishen amodifiedformulaforcalculatinglowdensitylipoproteincholesterolvalues AT jinxuejuan amodifiedformulaforcalculatinglowdensitylipoproteincholesterolvalues AT yaohaili amodifiedformulaforcalculatinglowdensitylipoproteincholesterolvalues AT chenbin amodifiedformulaforcalculatinglowdensitylipoproteincholesterolvalues AT zouyunzeng amodifiedformulaforcalculatinglowdensitylipoproteincholesterolvalues AT gejunbo amodifiedformulaforcalculatinglowdensitylipoproteincholesterolvalues AT chenhaozhu amodifiedformulaforcalculatinglowdensitylipoproteincholesterolvalues AT chenyunqin modifiedformulaforcalculatinglowdensitylipoproteincholesterolvalues AT zhangxiaojin modifiedformulaforcalculatinglowdensitylipoproteincholesterolvalues AT panbaishen modifiedformulaforcalculatinglowdensitylipoproteincholesterolvalues AT jinxuejuan modifiedformulaforcalculatinglowdensitylipoproteincholesterolvalues AT yaohaili modifiedformulaforcalculatinglowdensitylipoproteincholesterolvalues AT chenbin modifiedformulaforcalculatinglowdensitylipoproteincholesterolvalues AT zouyunzeng modifiedformulaforcalculatinglowdensitylipoproteincholesterolvalues AT gejunbo modifiedformulaforcalculatinglowdensitylipoproteincholesterolvalues AT chenhaozhu modifiedformulaforcalculatinglowdensitylipoproteincholesterolvalues |