Cargando…

A modified formula for calculating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol values

BACKGROUND: The Friedewald formula (FF) is useful for calculating serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) values, but has a remarkable deviation and limitation especially in hypertriglyceridemia. We modify the formula which is now more suitable for LDL-C calculation. METHODS: 2180 cases we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Yunqin, Zhang, Xiaojin, Pan, Baishen, Jin, Xuejuan, Yao, Haili, Chen, Bin, Zou, Yunzeng, Ge, Junbo, Chen, Haozhu
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2890624/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20487572
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-511X-9-52
_version_ 1782182820712546304
author Chen, Yunqin
Zhang, Xiaojin
Pan, Baishen
Jin, Xuejuan
Yao, Haili
Chen, Bin
Zou, Yunzeng
Ge, Junbo
Chen, Haozhu
author_facet Chen, Yunqin
Zhang, Xiaojin
Pan, Baishen
Jin, Xuejuan
Yao, Haili
Chen, Bin
Zou, Yunzeng
Ge, Junbo
Chen, Haozhu
author_sort Chen, Yunqin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Friedewald formula (FF) is useful for calculating serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) values, but has a remarkable deviation and limitation especially in hypertriglyceridemia. We modify the formula which is now more suitable for LDL-C calculation. METHODS: 2180 cases were classified into three groups according to their TG concentrations (A: < 200 mg/dl, n = 1220; B: 200-400 mg/dl, n = 480; C: 400-1000 mg/dl, n = 480). The concentrations of LDL-C were measured or estimated by 1) a direct measurement (DM); 2) the FF; and 3) our modified Friedewald formula (MFF): LDL-C (mg/dl) = Non-HDL-C × 90% - TG × 10%. RESULTS: Linear regression showed a significant correlation (P < 0.001) between the measured and calculated LDL-C values. Bland-Altman plots indicated that the methods (DM/MFF) were in better agreement than those (DM/FF). The LDL-C/Non-HDL-C ratio in FF calculated values was significantly lower (P < 0.05) than that in MFF or DM values, while no significant difference between MFF and DM was found. In Group A and Group B, 4.26% and 14.79% of the MFF calculated values had more than 20% deviation from those measured by DM. These percentages were significantly lower than those calculated by FF, where 7.30% and 25.63% were observed, respectively (P < 0.01 and P < 0.001). The MFF calculated values were all positive even in Group C. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the FF calculation, serum LDL-C values estimated by our modified formula are closer to those measured by a direct assay. The modification significantly diminishes the interference caused by hypertriglyceridemia.
format Text
id pubmed-2890624
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28906242010-06-24 A modified formula for calculating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol values Chen, Yunqin Zhang, Xiaojin Pan, Baishen Jin, Xuejuan Yao, Haili Chen, Bin Zou, Yunzeng Ge, Junbo Chen, Haozhu Lipids Health Dis Short Paper BACKGROUND: The Friedewald formula (FF) is useful for calculating serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) values, but has a remarkable deviation and limitation especially in hypertriglyceridemia. We modify the formula which is now more suitable for LDL-C calculation. METHODS: 2180 cases were classified into three groups according to their TG concentrations (A: < 200 mg/dl, n = 1220; B: 200-400 mg/dl, n = 480; C: 400-1000 mg/dl, n = 480). The concentrations of LDL-C were measured or estimated by 1) a direct measurement (DM); 2) the FF; and 3) our modified Friedewald formula (MFF): LDL-C (mg/dl) = Non-HDL-C × 90% - TG × 10%. RESULTS: Linear regression showed a significant correlation (P < 0.001) between the measured and calculated LDL-C values. Bland-Altman plots indicated that the methods (DM/MFF) were in better agreement than those (DM/FF). The LDL-C/Non-HDL-C ratio in FF calculated values was significantly lower (P < 0.05) than that in MFF or DM values, while no significant difference between MFF and DM was found. In Group A and Group B, 4.26% and 14.79% of the MFF calculated values had more than 20% deviation from those measured by DM. These percentages were significantly lower than those calculated by FF, where 7.30% and 25.63% were observed, respectively (P < 0.01 and P < 0.001). The MFF calculated values were all positive even in Group C. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the FF calculation, serum LDL-C values estimated by our modified formula are closer to those measured by a direct assay. The modification significantly diminishes the interference caused by hypertriglyceridemia. BioMed Central 2010-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC2890624/ /pubmed/20487572 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-511X-9-52 Text en Copyright ©2010 Chen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Short Paper
Chen, Yunqin
Zhang, Xiaojin
Pan, Baishen
Jin, Xuejuan
Yao, Haili
Chen, Bin
Zou, Yunzeng
Ge, Junbo
Chen, Haozhu
A modified formula for calculating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol values
title A modified formula for calculating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol values
title_full A modified formula for calculating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol values
title_fullStr A modified formula for calculating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol values
title_full_unstemmed A modified formula for calculating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol values
title_short A modified formula for calculating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol values
title_sort modified formula for calculating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol values
topic Short Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2890624/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20487572
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-511X-9-52
work_keys_str_mv AT chenyunqin amodifiedformulaforcalculatinglowdensitylipoproteincholesterolvalues
AT zhangxiaojin amodifiedformulaforcalculatinglowdensitylipoproteincholesterolvalues
AT panbaishen amodifiedformulaforcalculatinglowdensitylipoproteincholesterolvalues
AT jinxuejuan amodifiedformulaforcalculatinglowdensitylipoproteincholesterolvalues
AT yaohaili amodifiedformulaforcalculatinglowdensitylipoproteincholesterolvalues
AT chenbin amodifiedformulaforcalculatinglowdensitylipoproteincholesterolvalues
AT zouyunzeng amodifiedformulaforcalculatinglowdensitylipoproteincholesterolvalues
AT gejunbo amodifiedformulaforcalculatinglowdensitylipoproteincholesterolvalues
AT chenhaozhu amodifiedformulaforcalculatinglowdensitylipoproteincholesterolvalues
AT chenyunqin modifiedformulaforcalculatinglowdensitylipoproteincholesterolvalues
AT zhangxiaojin modifiedformulaforcalculatinglowdensitylipoproteincholesterolvalues
AT panbaishen modifiedformulaforcalculatinglowdensitylipoproteincholesterolvalues
AT jinxuejuan modifiedformulaforcalculatinglowdensitylipoproteincholesterolvalues
AT yaohaili modifiedformulaforcalculatinglowdensitylipoproteincholesterolvalues
AT chenbin modifiedformulaforcalculatinglowdensitylipoproteincholesterolvalues
AT zouyunzeng modifiedformulaforcalculatinglowdensitylipoproteincholesterolvalues
AT gejunbo modifiedformulaforcalculatinglowdensitylipoproteincholesterolvalues
AT chenhaozhu modifiedformulaforcalculatinglowdensitylipoproteincholesterolvalues