Cargando…
A randomized controlled study to evaluate the cost-effectiveness in sperm extraction using carbon dioxide and carbon dioxide free system in relation to intrauterine insemination pregnancy
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of two different systems i.e. circulating water bath and carbon dioxide (CO(2)) incubator in extracting motile sperm for IUI programme and their effect on pregnancy outcome. METHODS: The study was performed on sixty-two patients recruited for ovulation induc...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2890902/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20607001 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.63114 |
_version_ | 1782182851199893504 |
---|---|
author | Bhakta, Rajesh Kumar, Pratap Adiga, Satish Kumar Kalthur, Gurprasad |
author_facet | Bhakta, Rajesh Kumar, Pratap Adiga, Satish Kumar Kalthur, Gurprasad |
author_sort | Bhakta, Rajesh |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of two different systems i.e. circulating water bath and carbon dioxide (CO(2)) incubator in extracting motile sperm for IUI programme and their effect on pregnancy outcome. METHODS: The study was performed on sixty-two patients recruited for ovulation induction followed by intrauterine insemination (IUI) in University fertility clinic. The patients were randomly divided into two groups and sperm preparation was performed with either water bath or CO(2) incubator system. The efficiency of the two systems was analyzed in relation to pregnancy outcome. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the efficacy of water bath and CO(2) system with respect to the quality of sperm extracted and pregnancy outcome. Although pregnancy rate was marginally higher in water bath group, it was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: CO(2)-free system can be a cost-effective approach in IUI programme which does not compromise with pregnancy rate. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2890902 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Medknow Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28909022010-07-06 A randomized controlled study to evaluate the cost-effectiveness in sperm extraction using carbon dioxide and carbon dioxide free system in relation to intrauterine insemination pregnancy Bhakta, Rajesh Kumar, Pratap Adiga, Satish Kumar Kalthur, Gurprasad J Hum Reprod Sci Original Article OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of two different systems i.e. circulating water bath and carbon dioxide (CO(2)) incubator in extracting motile sperm for IUI programme and their effect on pregnancy outcome. METHODS: The study was performed on sixty-two patients recruited for ovulation induction followed by intrauterine insemination (IUI) in University fertility clinic. The patients were randomly divided into two groups and sperm preparation was performed with either water bath or CO(2) incubator system. The efficiency of the two systems was analyzed in relation to pregnancy outcome. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the efficacy of water bath and CO(2) system with respect to the quality of sperm extracted and pregnancy outcome. Although pregnancy rate was marginally higher in water bath group, it was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: CO(2)-free system can be a cost-effective approach in IUI programme which does not compromise with pregnancy rate. Medknow Publications 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2890902/ /pubmed/20607001 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.63114 Text en © Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Bhakta, Rajesh Kumar, Pratap Adiga, Satish Kumar Kalthur, Gurprasad A randomized controlled study to evaluate the cost-effectiveness in sperm extraction using carbon dioxide and carbon dioxide free system in relation to intrauterine insemination pregnancy |
title | A randomized controlled study to evaluate the cost-effectiveness in sperm extraction using carbon dioxide and carbon dioxide free system in relation to intrauterine insemination pregnancy |
title_full | A randomized controlled study to evaluate the cost-effectiveness in sperm extraction using carbon dioxide and carbon dioxide free system in relation to intrauterine insemination pregnancy |
title_fullStr | A randomized controlled study to evaluate the cost-effectiveness in sperm extraction using carbon dioxide and carbon dioxide free system in relation to intrauterine insemination pregnancy |
title_full_unstemmed | A randomized controlled study to evaluate the cost-effectiveness in sperm extraction using carbon dioxide and carbon dioxide free system in relation to intrauterine insemination pregnancy |
title_short | A randomized controlled study to evaluate the cost-effectiveness in sperm extraction using carbon dioxide and carbon dioxide free system in relation to intrauterine insemination pregnancy |
title_sort | randomized controlled study to evaluate the cost-effectiveness in sperm extraction using carbon dioxide and carbon dioxide free system in relation to intrauterine insemination pregnancy |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2890902/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20607001 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.63114 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bhaktarajesh arandomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatethecosteffectivenessinspermextractionusingcarbondioxideandcarbondioxidefreesysteminrelationtointrauterineinseminationpregnancy AT kumarpratap arandomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatethecosteffectivenessinspermextractionusingcarbondioxideandcarbondioxidefreesysteminrelationtointrauterineinseminationpregnancy AT adigasatishkumar arandomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatethecosteffectivenessinspermextractionusingcarbondioxideandcarbondioxidefreesysteminrelationtointrauterineinseminationpregnancy AT kalthurgurprasad arandomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatethecosteffectivenessinspermextractionusingcarbondioxideandcarbondioxidefreesysteminrelationtointrauterineinseminationpregnancy AT bhaktarajesh randomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatethecosteffectivenessinspermextractionusingcarbondioxideandcarbondioxidefreesysteminrelationtointrauterineinseminationpregnancy AT kumarpratap randomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatethecosteffectivenessinspermextractionusingcarbondioxideandcarbondioxidefreesysteminrelationtointrauterineinseminationpregnancy AT adigasatishkumar randomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatethecosteffectivenessinspermextractionusingcarbondioxideandcarbondioxidefreesysteminrelationtointrauterineinseminationpregnancy AT kalthurgurprasad randomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatethecosteffectivenessinspermextractionusingcarbondioxideandcarbondioxidefreesysteminrelationtointrauterineinseminationpregnancy |