Cargando…

A randomized controlled study to evaluate the cost-effectiveness in sperm extraction using carbon dioxide and carbon dioxide free system in relation to intrauterine insemination pregnancy

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of two different systems i.e. circulating water bath and carbon dioxide (CO(2)) incubator in extracting motile sperm for IUI programme and their effect on pregnancy outcome. METHODS: The study was performed on sixty-two patients recruited for ovulation induc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bhakta, Rajesh, Kumar, Pratap, Adiga, Satish Kumar, Kalthur, Gurprasad
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2890902/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20607001
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.63114
_version_ 1782182851199893504
author Bhakta, Rajesh
Kumar, Pratap
Adiga, Satish Kumar
Kalthur, Gurprasad
author_facet Bhakta, Rajesh
Kumar, Pratap
Adiga, Satish Kumar
Kalthur, Gurprasad
author_sort Bhakta, Rajesh
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of two different systems i.e. circulating water bath and carbon dioxide (CO(2)) incubator in extracting motile sperm for IUI programme and their effect on pregnancy outcome. METHODS: The study was performed on sixty-two patients recruited for ovulation induction followed by intrauterine insemination (IUI) in University fertility clinic. The patients were randomly divided into two groups and sperm preparation was performed with either water bath or CO(2) incubator system. The efficiency of the two systems was analyzed in relation to pregnancy outcome. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the efficacy of water bath and CO(2) system with respect to the quality of sperm extracted and pregnancy outcome. Although pregnancy rate was marginally higher in water bath group, it was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: CO(2)-free system can be a cost-effective approach in IUI programme which does not compromise with pregnancy rate.
format Text
id pubmed-2890902
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28909022010-07-06 A randomized controlled study to evaluate the cost-effectiveness in sperm extraction using carbon dioxide and carbon dioxide free system in relation to intrauterine insemination pregnancy Bhakta, Rajesh Kumar, Pratap Adiga, Satish Kumar Kalthur, Gurprasad J Hum Reprod Sci Original Article OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of two different systems i.e. circulating water bath and carbon dioxide (CO(2)) incubator in extracting motile sperm for IUI programme and their effect on pregnancy outcome. METHODS: The study was performed on sixty-two patients recruited for ovulation induction followed by intrauterine insemination (IUI) in University fertility clinic. The patients were randomly divided into two groups and sperm preparation was performed with either water bath or CO(2) incubator system. The efficiency of the two systems was analyzed in relation to pregnancy outcome. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the efficacy of water bath and CO(2) system with respect to the quality of sperm extracted and pregnancy outcome. Although pregnancy rate was marginally higher in water bath group, it was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: CO(2)-free system can be a cost-effective approach in IUI programme which does not compromise with pregnancy rate. Medknow Publications 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2890902/ /pubmed/20607001 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.63114 Text en © Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Bhakta, Rajesh
Kumar, Pratap
Adiga, Satish Kumar
Kalthur, Gurprasad
A randomized controlled study to evaluate the cost-effectiveness in sperm extraction using carbon dioxide and carbon dioxide free system in relation to intrauterine insemination pregnancy
title A randomized controlled study to evaluate the cost-effectiveness in sperm extraction using carbon dioxide and carbon dioxide free system in relation to intrauterine insemination pregnancy
title_full A randomized controlled study to evaluate the cost-effectiveness in sperm extraction using carbon dioxide and carbon dioxide free system in relation to intrauterine insemination pregnancy
title_fullStr A randomized controlled study to evaluate the cost-effectiveness in sperm extraction using carbon dioxide and carbon dioxide free system in relation to intrauterine insemination pregnancy
title_full_unstemmed A randomized controlled study to evaluate the cost-effectiveness in sperm extraction using carbon dioxide and carbon dioxide free system in relation to intrauterine insemination pregnancy
title_short A randomized controlled study to evaluate the cost-effectiveness in sperm extraction using carbon dioxide and carbon dioxide free system in relation to intrauterine insemination pregnancy
title_sort randomized controlled study to evaluate the cost-effectiveness in sperm extraction using carbon dioxide and carbon dioxide free system in relation to intrauterine insemination pregnancy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2890902/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20607001
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.63114
work_keys_str_mv AT bhaktarajesh arandomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatethecosteffectivenessinspermextractionusingcarbondioxideandcarbondioxidefreesysteminrelationtointrauterineinseminationpregnancy
AT kumarpratap arandomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatethecosteffectivenessinspermextractionusingcarbondioxideandcarbondioxidefreesysteminrelationtointrauterineinseminationpregnancy
AT adigasatishkumar arandomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatethecosteffectivenessinspermextractionusingcarbondioxideandcarbondioxidefreesysteminrelationtointrauterineinseminationpregnancy
AT kalthurgurprasad arandomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatethecosteffectivenessinspermextractionusingcarbondioxideandcarbondioxidefreesysteminrelationtointrauterineinseminationpregnancy
AT bhaktarajesh randomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatethecosteffectivenessinspermextractionusingcarbondioxideandcarbondioxidefreesysteminrelationtointrauterineinseminationpregnancy
AT kumarpratap randomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatethecosteffectivenessinspermextractionusingcarbondioxideandcarbondioxidefreesysteminrelationtointrauterineinseminationpregnancy
AT adigasatishkumar randomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatethecosteffectivenessinspermextractionusingcarbondioxideandcarbondioxidefreesysteminrelationtointrauterineinseminationpregnancy
AT kalthurgurprasad randomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatethecosteffectivenessinspermextractionusingcarbondioxideandcarbondioxidefreesysteminrelationtointrauterineinseminationpregnancy