Cargando…

Is lymphadenectomy a prognostic marker in endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the human endometrium?

BACKGROUND: During surgery for endometrial cancer, a pelvic lymphadenectomy with or without para-aortic lymphadenectomy is performed at least in patients with risk factors (stage I, grading 2 and/or histological subtypes with higher risk of lymphatic spread), and is hence recommended by the Internat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bassarak, Nina, Blankenstein, Thomas, Brüning, Ansgar, Dian, Darius, Bergauer, Florian, Friese, Klaus, Mylonas, Ioannis
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2891635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20492712
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-10-224
_version_ 1782182878440849408
author Bassarak, Nina
Blankenstein, Thomas
Brüning, Ansgar
Dian, Darius
Bergauer, Florian
Friese, Klaus
Mylonas, Ioannis
author_facet Bassarak, Nina
Blankenstein, Thomas
Brüning, Ansgar
Dian, Darius
Bergauer, Florian
Friese, Klaus
Mylonas, Ioannis
author_sort Bassarak, Nina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: During surgery for endometrial cancer, a pelvic lymphadenectomy with or without para-aortic lymphadenectomy is performed at least in patients with risk factors (stage I, grading 2 and/or histological subtypes with higher risk of lymphatic spread), and is hence recommended by the International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology (FIGO). Although lymph node metastases are important prognostic parameters, it has been contentious whether a pelvic lymph node dissection itself has a prognostic impact in the treatment of endometrial cancer, especially in endometrioid adenocarcinoma. Therefore, this study evaluated whether lymphadenectomy has a prognostic impact in patients with endometrioid adenocarcinoma. METHODS: The benefits of lymphadenectomy were examined in 214 patients with a histological diagnosis of endometrial adenocarcinoma. Tumour characteristics were analysed with respect to the surgical and pathological stage. RESULTS: Of the 214 patients with endometrial adenocarcinoma, 171 (79.9%) were classified as FIGO stage I, 15 (7.0%) FIGO stage II, 21 (9.8%) FIGO stage III and 7 (3.3%) FIGO stage IV. One hundred and thirty four (62.6%) of the patients had a histological grade 1 tumour, while 56 (26.2%) and 24 (11.2%) had a histological grade 2 or grade 3 tumour, respectively. Lymphadenectomy was performed in 151 (70.6%) patients. Only 11 (5.1%) patients showed metastatic disease in the lymph nodes. The performance of a lymphadenectomy resulted in significantly increased cause-specific and overall survival, while progression-free survival was not affected by this operative procedure. CONCLUSIONS: The performance of an operative lymphadenectomy resulted in better survival of patients with endometrioid adenocarcinoma. This increase was significant for cause-specific and overall survival, while there was a tendency only towards increased progression-free survival. Therefore, even in endometrioid adenocarcinoma, a pelvic and/or para-aortic lymphadenectomy should be performed.
format Text
id pubmed-2891635
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28916352010-06-25 Is lymphadenectomy a prognostic marker in endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the human endometrium? Bassarak, Nina Blankenstein, Thomas Brüning, Ansgar Dian, Darius Bergauer, Florian Friese, Klaus Mylonas, Ioannis BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: During surgery for endometrial cancer, a pelvic lymphadenectomy with or without para-aortic lymphadenectomy is performed at least in patients with risk factors (stage I, grading 2 and/or histological subtypes with higher risk of lymphatic spread), and is hence recommended by the International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology (FIGO). Although lymph node metastases are important prognostic parameters, it has been contentious whether a pelvic lymph node dissection itself has a prognostic impact in the treatment of endometrial cancer, especially in endometrioid adenocarcinoma. Therefore, this study evaluated whether lymphadenectomy has a prognostic impact in patients with endometrioid adenocarcinoma. METHODS: The benefits of lymphadenectomy were examined in 214 patients with a histological diagnosis of endometrial adenocarcinoma. Tumour characteristics were analysed with respect to the surgical and pathological stage. RESULTS: Of the 214 patients with endometrial adenocarcinoma, 171 (79.9%) were classified as FIGO stage I, 15 (7.0%) FIGO stage II, 21 (9.8%) FIGO stage III and 7 (3.3%) FIGO stage IV. One hundred and thirty four (62.6%) of the patients had a histological grade 1 tumour, while 56 (26.2%) and 24 (11.2%) had a histological grade 2 or grade 3 tumour, respectively. Lymphadenectomy was performed in 151 (70.6%) patients. Only 11 (5.1%) patients showed metastatic disease in the lymph nodes. The performance of a lymphadenectomy resulted in significantly increased cause-specific and overall survival, while progression-free survival was not affected by this operative procedure. CONCLUSIONS: The performance of an operative lymphadenectomy resulted in better survival of patients with endometrioid adenocarcinoma. This increase was significant for cause-specific and overall survival, while there was a tendency only towards increased progression-free survival. Therefore, even in endometrioid adenocarcinoma, a pelvic and/or para-aortic lymphadenectomy should be performed. BioMed Central 2010-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC2891635/ /pubmed/20492712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-10-224 Text en Copyright ©2010 Bassarak et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bassarak, Nina
Blankenstein, Thomas
Brüning, Ansgar
Dian, Darius
Bergauer, Florian
Friese, Klaus
Mylonas, Ioannis
Is lymphadenectomy a prognostic marker in endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the human endometrium?
title Is lymphadenectomy a prognostic marker in endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the human endometrium?
title_full Is lymphadenectomy a prognostic marker in endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the human endometrium?
title_fullStr Is lymphadenectomy a prognostic marker in endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the human endometrium?
title_full_unstemmed Is lymphadenectomy a prognostic marker in endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the human endometrium?
title_short Is lymphadenectomy a prognostic marker in endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the human endometrium?
title_sort is lymphadenectomy a prognostic marker in endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the human endometrium?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2891635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20492712
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-10-224
work_keys_str_mv AT bassaraknina islymphadenectomyaprognosticmarkerinendometrioidadenocarcinomaofthehumanendometrium
AT blankensteinthomas islymphadenectomyaprognosticmarkerinendometrioidadenocarcinomaofthehumanendometrium
AT bruningansgar islymphadenectomyaprognosticmarkerinendometrioidadenocarcinomaofthehumanendometrium
AT diandarius islymphadenectomyaprognosticmarkerinendometrioidadenocarcinomaofthehumanendometrium
AT bergauerflorian islymphadenectomyaprognosticmarkerinendometrioidadenocarcinomaofthehumanendometrium
AT frieseklaus islymphadenectomyaprognosticmarkerinendometrioidadenocarcinomaofthehumanendometrium
AT mylonasioannis islymphadenectomyaprognosticmarkerinendometrioidadenocarcinomaofthehumanendometrium