Cargando…
Is lymphadenectomy a prognostic marker in endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the human endometrium?
BACKGROUND: During surgery for endometrial cancer, a pelvic lymphadenectomy with or without para-aortic lymphadenectomy is performed at least in patients with risk factors (stage I, grading 2 and/or histological subtypes with higher risk of lymphatic spread), and is hence recommended by the Internat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2891635/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20492712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-10-224 |
_version_ | 1782182878440849408 |
---|---|
author | Bassarak, Nina Blankenstein, Thomas Brüning, Ansgar Dian, Darius Bergauer, Florian Friese, Klaus Mylonas, Ioannis |
author_facet | Bassarak, Nina Blankenstein, Thomas Brüning, Ansgar Dian, Darius Bergauer, Florian Friese, Klaus Mylonas, Ioannis |
author_sort | Bassarak, Nina |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: During surgery for endometrial cancer, a pelvic lymphadenectomy with or without para-aortic lymphadenectomy is performed at least in patients with risk factors (stage I, grading 2 and/or histological subtypes with higher risk of lymphatic spread), and is hence recommended by the International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology (FIGO). Although lymph node metastases are important prognostic parameters, it has been contentious whether a pelvic lymph node dissection itself has a prognostic impact in the treatment of endometrial cancer, especially in endometrioid adenocarcinoma. Therefore, this study evaluated whether lymphadenectomy has a prognostic impact in patients with endometrioid adenocarcinoma. METHODS: The benefits of lymphadenectomy were examined in 214 patients with a histological diagnosis of endometrial adenocarcinoma. Tumour characteristics were analysed with respect to the surgical and pathological stage. RESULTS: Of the 214 patients with endometrial adenocarcinoma, 171 (79.9%) were classified as FIGO stage I, 15 (7.0%) FIGO stage II, 21 (9.8%) FIGO stage III and 7 (3.3%) FIGO stage IV. One hundred and thirty four (62.6%) of the patients had a histological grade 1 tumour, while 56 (26.2%) and 24 (11.2%) had a histological grade 2 or grade 3 tumour, respectively. Lymphadenectomy was performed in 151 (70.6%) patients. Only 11 (5.1%) patients showed metastatic disease in the lymph nodes. The performance of a lymphadenectomy resulted in significantly increased cause-specific and overall survival, while progression-free survival was not affected by this operative procedure. CONCLUSIONS: The performance of an operative lymphadenectomy resulted in better survival of patients with endometrioid adenocarcinoma. This increase was significant for cause-specific and overall survival, while there was a tendency only towards increased progression-free survival. Therefore, even in endometrioid adenocarcinoma, a pelvic and/or para-aortic lymphadenectomy should be performed. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2891635 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28916352010-06-25 Is lymphadenectomy a prognostic marker in endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the human endometrium? Bassarak, Nina Blankenstein, Thomas Brüning, Ansgar Dian, Darius Bergauer, Florian Friese, Klaus Mylonas, Ioannis BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: During surgery for endometrial cancer, a pelvic lymphadenectomy with or without para-aortic lymphadenectomy is performed at least in patients with risk factors (stage I, grading 2 and/or histological subtypes with higher risk of lymphatic spread), and is hence recommended by the International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology (FIGO). Although lymph node metastases are important prognostic parameters, it has been contentious whether a pelvic lymph node dissection itself has a prognostic impact in the treatment of endometrial cancer, especially in endometrioid adenocarcinoma. Therefore, this study evaluated whether lymphadenectomy has a prognostic impact in patients with endometrioid adenocarcinoma. METHODS: The benefits of lymphadenectomy were examined in 214 patients with a histological diagnosis of endometrial adenocarcinoma. Tumour characteristics were analysed with respect to the surgical and pathological stage. RESULTS: Of the 214 patients with endometrial adenocarcinoma, 171 (79.9%) were classified as FIGO stage I, 15 (7.0%) FIGO stage II, 21 (9.8%) FIGO stage III and 7 (3.3%) FIGO stage IV. One hundred and thirty four (62.6%) of the patients had a histological grade 1 tumour, while 56 (26.2%) and 24 (11.2%) had a histological grade 2 or grade 3 tumour, respectively. Lymphadenectomy was performed in 151 (70.6%) patients. Only 11 (5.1%) patients showed metastatic disease in the lymph nodes. The performance of a lymphadenectomy resulted in significantly increased cause-specific and overall survival, while progression-free survival was not affected by this operative procedure. CONCLUSIONS: The performance of an operative lymphadenectomy resulted in better survival of patients with endometrioid adenocarcinoma. This increase was significant for cause-specific and overall survival, while there was a tendency only towards increased progression-free survival. Therefore, even in endometrioid adenocarcinoma, a pelvic and/or para-aortic lymphadenectomy should be performed. BioMed Central 2010-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC2891635/ /pubmed/20492712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-10-224 Text en Copyright ©2010 Bassarak et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Bassarak, Nina Blankenstein, Thomas Brüning, Ansgar Dian, Darius Bergauer, Florian Friese, Klaus Mylonas, Ioannis Is lymphadenectomy a prognostic marker in endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the human endometrium? |
title | Is lymphadenectomy a prognostic marker in endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the human endometrium? |
title_full | Is lymphadenectomy a prognostic marker in endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the human endometrium? |
title_fullStr | Is lymphadenectomy a prognostic marker in endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the human endometrium? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is lymphadenectomy a prognostic marker in endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the human endometrium? |
title_short | Is lymphadenectomy a prognostic marker in endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the human endometrium? |
title_sort | is lymphadenectomy a prognostic marker in endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the human endometrium? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2891635/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20492712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-10-224 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bassaraknina islymphadenectomyaprognosticmarkerinendometrioidadenocarcinomaofthehumanendometrium AT blankensteinthomas islymphadenectomyaprognosticmarkerinendometrioidadenocarcinomaofthehumanendometrium AT bruningansgar islymphadenectomyaprognosticmarkerinendometrioidadenocarcinomaofthehumanendometrium AT diandarius islymphadenectomyaprognosticmarkerinendometrioidadenocarcinomaofthehumanendometrium AT bergauerflorian islymphadenectomyaprognosticmarkerinendometrioidadenocarcinomaofthehumanendometrium AT frieseklaus islymphadenectomyaprognosticmarkerinendometrioidadenocarcinomaofthehumanendometrium AT mylonasioannis islymphadenectomyaprognosticmarkerinendometrioidadenocarcinomaofthehumanendometrium |