Cargando…

Simply longer is not better: reversal of theta burst after-effect with prolonged stimulation

From all rTMS protocols at present, the theta burst stimulation (TBS) is considered the most efficient in terms of number of impulses and intensity required during a given stimulation. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of inhibitory and excitatory TBS protocols on motor cortex exc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gamboa, Olga Lucía, Antal, Andrea, Moliadze, Vera, Paulus, Walter
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2892066/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20567808
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2293-4
_version_ 1782182919645691904
author Gamboa, Olga Lucía
Antal, Andrea
Moliadze, Vera
Paulus, Walter
author_facet Gamboa, Olga Lucía
Antal, Andrea
Moliadze, Vera
Paulus, Walter
author_sort Gamboa, Olga Lucía
collection PubMed
description From all rTMS protocols at present, the theta burst stimulation (TBS) is considered the most efficient in terms of number of impulses and intensity required during a given stimulation. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of inhibitory and excitatory TBS protocols on motor cortex excitability when the duration of stimulation was doubled. Fourteen healthy volunteers were tested under four conditions: intermittent theta bust stimulation (iTBS), continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS), prolonged intermittent theta bust stimulation (ProiTBS) and prolonged continuous theta burst stimulation (ProcTBS). The prolonged paradigms were twice as long as the conventional TBS protocols. Conventional facilitatory iTBS converted into inhibitory when it was applied for twice as long, while the normally inhibitory cTBS became facilitatory when the stimulation duration was doubled. Our results show that TBS-induced plasticity cannot be deliberately enhanced simply by prolonging TBS protocols. Instead, when stimulating too long, after-effects will be reversed. This finding supplements findings at the short end of the stimulation duration range, where it was shown that conventional cTBS is excitatory in the first half and switches to inhibition only after the full length protocol. It is relevant for clinical applications for which an ongoing need for further protocol improvement is imminent.
format Text
id pubmed-2892066
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28920662010-07-21 Simply longer is not better: reversal of theta burst after-effect with prolonged stimulation Gamboa, Olga Lucía Antal, Andrea Moliadze, Vera Paulus, Walter Exp Brain Res Research Article From all rTMS protocols at present, the theta burst stimulation (TBS) is considered the most efficient in terms of number of impulses and intensity required during a given stimulation. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of inhibitory and excitatory TBS protocols on motor cortex excitability when the duration of stimulation was doubled. Fourteen healthy volunteers were tested under four conditions: intermittent theta bust stimulation (iTBS), continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS), prolonged intermittent theta bust stimulation (ProiTBS) and prolonged continuous theta burst stimulation (ProcTBS). The prolonged paradigms were twice as long as the conventional TBS protocols. Conventional facilitatory iTBS converted into inhibitory when it was applied for twice as long, while the normally inhibitory cTBS became facilitatory when the stimulation duration was doubled. Our results show that TBS-induced plasticity cannot be deliberately enhanced simply by prolonging TBS protocols. Instead, when stimulating too long, after-effects will be reversed. This finding supplements findings at the short end of the stimulation duration range, where it was shown that conventional cTBS is excitatory in the first half and switches to inhibition only after the full length protocol. It is relevant for clinical applications for which an ongoing need for further protocol improvement is imminent. Springer-Verlag 2010-06-22 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2892066/ /pubmed/20567808 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2293-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gamboa, Olga Lucía
Antal, Andrea
Moliadze, Vera
Paulus, Walter
Simply longer is not better: reversal of theta burst after-effect with prolonged stimulation
title Simply longer is not better: reversal of theta burst after-effect with prolonged stimulation
title_full Simply longer is not better: reversal of theta burst after-effect with prolonged stimulation
title_fullStr Simply longer is not better: reversal of theta burst after-effect with prolonged stimulation
title_full_unstemmed Simply longer is not better: reversal of theta burst after-effect with prolonged stimulation
title_short Simply longer is not better: reversal of theta burst after-effect with prolonged stimulation
title_sort simply longer is not better: reversal of theta burst after-effect with prolonged stimulation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2892066/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20567808
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2293-4
work_keys_str_mv AT gamboaolgalucia simplylongerisnotbetterreversalofthetaburstaftereffectwithprolongedstimulation
AT antalandrea simplylongerisnotbetterreversalofthetaburstaftereffectwithprolongedstimulation
AT moliadzevera simplylongerisnotbetterreversalofthetaburstaftereffectwithprolongedstimulation
AT pauluswalter simplylongerisnotbetterreversalofthetaburstaftereffectwithprolongedstimulation