Cargando…

Different Corticostriatal Integration in Spiny Projection Neurons from Direct and Indirect Pathways

The striatum is the principal input structure of the basal ganglia. Major glutamatergic afferents to the striatum come from the cerebral cortex and make monosynaptic contacts with medium spiny projection neurons (MSNs) and interneurons. Also: glutamatergic afferents to the striatum come from the tha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Flores-Barrera, Edén, Vizcarra-Chacón, Bianca J., Tapia, Dagoberto, Bargas, José, Galarraga, Elvira
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Research Foundation 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2893005/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20589098
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2010.00015
_version_ 1782182993453907968
author Flores-Barrera, Edén
Vizcarra-Chacón, Bianca J.
Tapia, Dagoberto
Bargas, José
Galarraga, Elvira
author_facet Flores-Barrera, Edén
Vizcarra-Chacón, Bianca J.
Tapia, Dagoberto
Bargas, José
Galarraga, Elvira
author_sort Flores-Barrera, Edén
collection PubMed
description The striatum is the principal input structure of the basal ganglia. Major glutamatergic afferents to the striatum come from the cerebral cortex and make monosynaptic contacts with medium spiny projection neurons (MSNs) and interneurons. Also: glutamatergic afferents to the striatum come from the thalamus. Despite differences in axonal projections, dopamine (DA) receptors expression and differences in excitability between MSNs from “direct” and “indirect” basal ganglia pathways, these neuronal classes have been thought as electrophysiologically very similar. Based on work with bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) transgenic mice, here it is shown that corticostriatal responses in D(1)- and D(2)-receptor expressing MSNs (D(1)- and D(2)-MSNs) are radically different so as to establish an electrophysiological footprint that readily differentiates between them. Experiments in BAC mice allowed us to predict, with high probability (P > 0.9), in rats or non-BAC mice, whether a recorded neuron, from rat or mouse, was going to be substance P or enkephalin (ENK) immunoreactive. Responses are more prolonged and evoke more action potentials in D(1)-MSNs, while they are briefer and exhibit intrinsic autoregenerative responses in D(2)-MSNs. A main cause for these differences was the interaction of intrinsic properties with the inhibitory contribution in each response. Inhibition always depressed corticostriatal depolarization in D(2)-MSNs, while it helped in sustaining prolonged depolarizations in D(1)-MSNs, in spite of depressing early discharge. Corticostriatal responses changed dramatically after striatal DA depletion in 6-hydroxy-dopamine (6-OHDA) lesioned animals: a response reduction was seen in substance P (SP)+ MSNs whereas an enhanced response was seen in ENK+ MSNs. The end result was that differences in the responses were greatly diminished after DA depletion.
format Text
id pubmed-2893005
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Frontiers Research Foundation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28930052010-06-29 Different Corticostriatal Integration in Spiny Projection Neurons from Direct and Indirect Pathways Flores-Barrera, Edén Vizcarra-Chacón, Bianca J. Tapia, Dagoberto Bargas, José Galarraga, Elvira Front Syst Neurosci Neuroscience The striatum is the principal input structure of the basal ganglia. Major glutamatergic afferents to the striatum come from the cerebral cortex and make monosynaptic contacts with medium spiny projection neurons (MSNs) and interneurons. Also: glutamatergic afferents to the striatum come from the thalamus. Despite differences in axonal projections, dopamine (DA) receptors expression and differences in excitability between MSNs from “direct” and “indirect” basal ganglia pathways, these neuronal classes have been thought as electrophysiologically very similar. Based on work with bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) transgenic mice, here it is shown that corticostriatal responses in D(1)- and D(2)-receptor expressing MSNs (D(1)- and D(2)-MSNs) are radically different so as to establish an electrophysiological footprint that readily differentiates between them. Experiments in BAC mice allowed us to predict, with high probability (P > 0.9), in rats or non-BAC mice, whether a recorded neuron, from rat or mouse, was going to be substance P or enkephalin (ENK) immunoreactive. Responses are more prolonged and evoke more action potentials in D(1)-MSNs, while they are briefer and exhibit intrinsic autoregenerative responses in D(2)-MSNs. A main cause for these differences was the interaction of intrinsic properties with the inhibitory contribution in each response. Inhibition always depressed corticostriatal depolarization in D(2)-MSNs, while it helped in sustaining prolonged depolarizations in D(1)-MSNs, in spite of depressing early discharge. Corticostriatal responses changed dramatically after striatal DA depletion in 6-hydroxy-dopamine (6-OHDA) lesioned animals: a response reduction was seen in substance P (SP)+ MSNs whereas an enhanced response was seen in ENK+ MSNs. The end result was that differences in the responses were greatly diminished after DA depletion. Frontiers Research Foundation 2010-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC2893005/ /pubmed/20589098 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2010.00015 Text en Copyright © 2010 Flores-Barrera, Vizcarra-Chacón, Tapia, Bargas and Galarraga. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article subject to an exclusive license agreement between the authors and the Frontiers Research Foundation, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are credited.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Flores-Barrera, Edén
Vizcarra-Chacón, Bianca J.
Tapia, Dagoberto
Bargas, José
Galarraga, Elvira
Different Corticostriatal Integration in Spiny Projection Neurons from Direct and Indirect Pathways
title Different Corticostriatal Integration in Spiny Projection Neurons from Direct and Indirect Pathways
title_full Different Corticostriatal Integration in Spiny Projection Neurons from Direct and Indirect Pathways
title_fullStr Different Corticostriatal Integration in Spiny Projection Neurons from Direct and Indirect Pathways
title_full_unstemmed Different Corticostriatal Integration in Spiny Projection Neurons from Direct and Indirect Pathways
title_short Different Corticostriatal Integration in Spiny Projection Neurons from Direct and Indirect Pathways
title_sort different corticostriatal integration in spiny projection neurons from direct and indirect pathways
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2893005/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20589098
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2010.00015
work_keys_str_mv AT floresbarreraeden differentcorticostriatalintegrationinspinyprojectionneuronsfromdirectandindirectpathways
AT vizcarrachaconbiancaj differentcorticostriatalintegrationinspinyprojectionneuronsfromdirectandindirectpathways
AT tapiadagoberto differentcorticostriatalintegrationinspinyprojectionneuronsfromdirectandindirectpathways
AT bargasjose differentcorticostriatalintegrationinspinyprojectionneuronsfromdirectandindirectpathways
AT galarragaelvira differentcorticostriatalintegrationinspinyprojectionneuronsfromdirectandindirectpathways