Cargando…

Comparison of three methods for ascertainment of contact information relevant to respiratory pathogen transmission in encounter networks

BACKGROUND: Mathematical models of infection that consider targeted interventions are exquisitely dependent on the assumed mixing patterns of the population. We report on a pilot study designed to assess three different methods (one retrospective, two prospective) for obtaining contact data relevant...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McCaw, James M, Forbes, Kristian, Nathan, Paula M, Pattison, Philippa E, Robins, Garry L, Nolan, Terence M, McVernon, Jodie
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2893181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20537186
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-10-166
_version_ 1782183018547380224
author McCaw, James M
Forbes, Kristian
Nathan, Paula M
Pattison, Philippa E
Robins, Garry L
Nolan, Terence M
McVernon, Jodie
author_facet McCaw, James M
Forbes, Kristian
Nathan, Paula M
Pattison, Philippa E
Robins, Garry L
Nolan, Terence M
McVernon, Jodie
author_sort McCaw, James M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mathematical models of infection that consider targeted interventions are exquisitely dependent on the assumed mixing patterns of the population. We report on a pilot study designed to assess three different methods (one retrospective, two prospective) for obtaining contact data relevant to the determination of these mixing patterns. METHODS: 65 adults were asked to record their social encounters in each location visited during 6 study days using a novel method whereby a change in physical location of the study participant triggered data entry. Using a cross-over design, all participants recorded encounters on 3 days in a paper diary and 3 days using an electronic recording device (PDA). Participants were randomised to first prospective recording method. RESULTS: Both methods captured more contacts than a pre-study questionnaire, but ascertainment using the paper diary was superior to the PDA (mean difference: 4.52 (95% CI 0.28, 8.77). Paper diaries were found more acceptable to the participants compared with the PDA. Statistical analysis confirms that our results are broadly consistent with those reported from large-scale European based surveys. An association between household size (trend 0.14, 95% CI (0.06, 0.22), P < 0.001) and composition (presence of child 0.37, 95% CI (0.17, 0.56), P < 0.001) and the total number of reported contacts was observed, highlighting the importance of sampling study populations based on household characteristics as well as age. New contacts were still being recorded on the third study day, but compliance had declined, indicating that the optimal number of sample days represents a trade-off between completeness and quality of data for an individual. CONCLUSIONS: The study's location-based reporting design allows greater scope compared to other methods for examining differences in the characteristics of encounters over a range of environments. Improved parameterisation of dynamic transmission models gained from work of this type will aid in the development of more robust decision support tools to assist health policy makers and planners.
format Text
id pubmed-2893181
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28931812010-06-29 Comparison of three methods for ascertainment of contact information relevant to respiratory pathogen transmission in encounter networks McCaw, James M Forbes, Kristian Nathan, Paula M Pattison, Philippa E Robins, Garry L Nolan, Terence M McVernon, Jodie BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Mathematical models of infection that consider targeted interventions are exquisitely dependent on the assumed mixing patterns of the population. We report on a pilot study designed to assess three different methods (one retrospective, two prospective) for obtaining contact data relevant to the determination of these mixing patterns. METHODS: 65 adults were asked to record their social encounters in each location visited during 6 study days using a novel method whereby a change in physical location of the study participant triggered data entry. Using a cross-over design, all participants recorded encounters on 3 days in a paper diary and 3 days using an electronic recording device (PDA). Participants were randomised to first prospective recording method. RESULTS: Both methods captured more contacts than a pre-study questionnaire, but ascertainment using the paper diary was superior to the PDA (mean difference: 4.52 (95% CI 0.28, 8.77). Paper diaries were found more acceptable to the participants compared with the PDA. Statistical analysis confirms that our results are broadly consistent with those reported from large-scale European based surveys. An association between household size (trend 0.14, 95% CI (0.06, 0.22), P < 0.001) and composition (presence of child 0.37, 95% CI (0.17, 0.56), P < 0.001) and the total number of reported contacts was observed, highlighting the importance of sampling study populations based on household characteristics as well as age. New contacts were still being recorded on the third study day, but compliance had declined, indicating that the optimal number of sample days represents a trade-off between completeness and quality of data for an individual. CONCLUSIONS: The study's location-based reporting design allows greater scope compared to other methods for examining differences in the characteristics of encounters over a range of environments. Improved parameterisation of dynamic transmission models gained from work of this type will aid in the development of more robust decision support tools to assist health policy makers and planners. BioMed Central 2010-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC2893181/ /pubmed/20537186 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-10-166 Text en Copyright ©2010 McCaw et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
McCaw, James M
Forbes, Kristian
Nathan, Paula M
Pattison, Philippa E
Robins, Garry L
Nolan, Terence M
McVernon, Jodie
Comparison of three methods for ascertainment of contact information relevant to respiratory pathogen transmission in encounter networks
title Comparison of three methods for ascertainment of contact information relevant to respiratory pathogen transmission in encounter networks
title_full Comparison of three methods for ascertainment of contact information relevant to respiratory pathogen transmission in encounter networks
title_fullStr Comparison of three methods for ascertainment of contact information relevant to respiratory pathogen transmission in encounter networks
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of three methods for ascertainment of contact information relevant to respiratory pathogen transmission in encounter networks
title_short Comparison of three methods for ascertainment of contact information relevant to respiratory pathogen transmission in encounter networks
title_sort comparison of three methods for ascertainment of contact information relevant to respiratory pathogen transmission in encounter networks
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2893181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20537186
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-10-166
work_keys_str_mv AT mccawjamesm comparisonofthreemethodsforascertainmentofcontactinformationrelevanttorespiratorypathogentransmissioninencounternetworks
AT forbeskristian comparisonofthreemethodsforascertainmentofcontactinformationrelevanttorespiratorypathogentransmissioninencounternetworks
AT nathanpaulam comparisonofthreemethodsforascertainmentofcontactinformationrelevanttorespiratorypathogentransmissioninencounternetworks
AT pattisonphilippae comparisonofthreemethodsforascertainmentofcontactinformationrelevanttorespiratorypathogentransmissioninencounternetworks
AT robinsgarryl comparisonofthreemethodsforascertainmentofcontactinformationrelevanttorespiratorypathogentransmissioninencounternetworks
AT nolanterencem comparisonofthreemethodsforascertainmentofcontactinformationrelevanttorespiratorypathogentransmissioninencounternetworks
AT mcvernonjodie comparisonofthreemethodsforascertainmentofcontactinformationrelevanttorespiratorypathogentransmissioninencounternetworks