Cargando…
The Usefulness of Peer Review for Selecting Manuscripts for Publication: A Utility Analysis Taking as an Example a High-Impact Journal
BACKGROUND: High predictive validity – that is, a strong association between the outcome of peer review (usually, reviewers' ratings) and the scientific quality of a manuscript submitted to a journal (measured as citations of the later published paper) – does not as a rule suffice to demonstrat...
Autores principales: | Bornmann, Lutz, Daniel, Hans-Dieter |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2893207/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20596540 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011344 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Does Gender Matter in Grant Peer Review?: An Empirical Investigation Using the Example of the Austrian Science
Fund
por: Mutz, Rüdiger, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
A Reliability-Generalization Study of Journal Peer Reviews: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Inter-Rater Reliability and Its Determinants
por: Bornmann, Lutz, et al.
Publicado: (2010) -
An overview of innovations in the external peer review of journal manuscripts.
por: Woods, Helen Buckley, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Heterogeneity of Inter-Rater Reliabilities of Grant Peer Reviews and Its Determinants: A General Estimating Equations Approach
por: Mutz, Rüdiger, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Gender differences in peer review outcomes and manuscript impact at six journals of ecology and evolution
por: Fox, Charles W., et al.
Publicado: (2019)