Cargando…

Genetic Compatibility Determines Endophyte-Grass Combinations

Even highly mutually beneficial microbial-plant interactions, such as mycorrhizal- and rhizobial-plant exchanges, involve selfishness, cheating and power-struggles between the partners, which depending on prevailing selective pressures, lead to a continuum of interactions from antagonistic to mutual...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saikkonen, Kari, Wäli, Piippa R., Helander, Marjo
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2894865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20614034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011395
_version_ 1782183230260117504
author Saikkonen, Kari
Wäli, Piippa R.
Helander, Marjo
author_facet Saikkonen, Kari
Wäli, Piippa R.
Helander, Marjo
author_sort Saikkonen, Kari
collection PubMed
description Even highly mutually beneficial microbial-plant interactions, such as mycorrhizal- and rhizobial-plant exchanges, involve selfishness, cheating and power-struggles between the partners, which depending on prevailing selective pressures, lead to a continuum of interactions from antagonistic to mutualistic. Using manipulated grass-endophyte combinations in a five year common garden experiment, we show that grass genotypes and genetic mismatches constrain genetic combinations between the vertically (via host seeds) transmitted endophytes and the out-crossing host, thereby reducing infections in established grass populations. Infections were lost in both grass tillers and seedlings in F(1) and F(2) generations, respectively. Experimental plants were collected as seeds from two different environments, i.e., meadows and nearby riverbanks. Endophyte-related benefits to the host included an increased number of inflorescences, but only in meadow plants and not until the last growing season of the experiment. Our results illustrate the importance of genetic host specificity and trans-generational maternal effects on the genetic structure of a host population, which act as destabilizing forces in endophyte-grass symbioses. We propose that (1) genetic mismatches may act as a buffering mechanism against highly competitive endophyte-grass genotype combinations threatening the biodiversity of grassland communities and (2) these mismatches should be acknowledged, particularly in breeding programmes aimed at harnessing systemic and heritable endophytes to improve the agriculturally valuable characteristics of cultivars.
format Text
id pubmed-2894865
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28948652010-07-07 Genetic Compatibility Determines Endophyte-Grass Combinations Saikkonen, Kari Wäli, Piippa R. Helander, Marjo PLoS One Research Article Even highly mutually beneficial microbial-plant interactions, such as mycorrhizal- and rhizobial-plant exchanges, involve selfishness, cheating and power-struggles between the partners, which depending on prevailing selective pressures, lead to a continuum of interactions from antagonistic to mutualistic. Using manipulated grass-endophyte combinations in a five year common garden experiment, we show that grass genotypes and genetic mismatches constrain genetic combinations between the vertically (via host seeds) transmitted endophytes and the out-crossing host, thereby reducing infections in established grass populations. Infections were lost in both grass tillers and seedlings in F(1) and F(2) generations, respectively. Experimental plants were collected as seeds from two different environments, i.e., meadows and nearby riverbanks. Endophyte-related benefits to the host included an increased number of inflorescences, but only in meadow plants and not until the last growing season of the experiment. Our results illustrate the importance of genetic host specificity and trans-generational maternal effects on the genetic structure of a host population, which act as destabilizing forces in endophyte-grass symbioses. We propose that (1) genetic mismatches may act as a buffering mechanism against highly competitive endophyte-grass genotype combinations threatening the biodiversity of grassland communities and (2) these mismatches should be acknowledged, particularly in breeding programmes aimed at harnessing systemic and heritable endophytes to improve the agriculturally valuable characteristics of cultivars. Public Library of Science 2010-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC2894865/ /pubmed/20614034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011395 Text en Saikkonen et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Saikkonen, Kari
Wäli, Piippa R.
Helander, Marjo
Genetic Compatibility Determines Endophyte-Grass Combinations
title Genetic Compatibility Determines Endophyte-Grass Combinations
title_full Genetic Compatibility Determines Endophyte-Grass Combinations
title_fullStr Genetic Compatibility Determines Endophyte-Grass Combinations
title_full_unstemmed Genetic Compatibility Determines Endophyte-Grass Combinations
title_short Genetic Compatibility Determines Endophyte-Grass Combinations
title_sort genetic compatibility determines endophyte-grass combinations
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2894865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20614034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011395
work_keys_str_mv AT saikkonenkari geneticcompatibilitydeterminesendophytegrasscombinations
AT walipiippar geneticcompatibilitydeterminesendophytegrasscombinations
AT helandermarjo geneticcompatibilitydeterminesendophytegrasscombinations