Cargando…
Selection of massive bone allografts using shape-matching 3-dimensional registration
Background and purpose Massive bone allografts are used when surgery causes large segmental defects. Shape-matching is the primary criterion for selection of an allograft. The current selection method, based on 2-dimensional template comparison, is inefficient for 3-dimensional complex bones. We hav...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Informa Healthcare
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2895347/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20175643 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453671003587127 |
_version_ | 1782183253634973696 |
---|---|
author | Paul, Laurent Docquier, Pierre-Louis Cartiaux, Olivier Cornu, Olivier Delloye, Christian Banse, Xavier |
author_facet | Paul, Laurent Docquier, Pierre-Louis Cartiaux, Olivier Cornu, Olivier Delloye, Christian Banse, Xavier |
author_sort | Paul, Laurent |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and purpose Massive bone allografts are used when surgery causes large segmental defects. Shape-matching is the primary criterion for selection of an allograft. The current selection method, based on 2-dimensional template comparison, is inefficient for 3-dimensional complex bones. We have analyzed a 3-dimensional (3-D) registration method to match the anatomy of the allograft with that of the recipient. Methods 3-D CT-based registration was performed to match the shapes of both bones. We used the registration to align the allograft volume onto the recipient's bone. Hemipelvic allograft selection was tested in 10 virtual recipients with a panel of 10 potential allografts, including one from the recipient himself (trap graft). 4 observers were asked to visually inspect the superposition of allograft over the recipient, to classify the allografts into 4 categories according to the matching of anatomic zones, and to select the 3 best matching allografts. The results obtained using the registration method were compared with those from a previous study on the template method. Results Using the registration method, the observers systematically detected the trap graft. Selections of the 3 best matching allografts performed using registration and template methods were different. Selection of the 3 best matching allografts was improved by the registration method. Finally, reproducibility of the selection was improved when using the registration method. Interpretation 3-D CT registration provides more useful information than the template method but the final decision lies with the surgeon, who should select the optimal allograft according to his or her own preferences and the needs of the recipient. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2895347 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Informa Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28953472010-09-03 Selection of massive bone allografts using shape-matching 3-dimensional registration Paul, Laurent Docquier, Pierre-Louis Cartiaux, Olivier Cornu, Olivier Delloye, Christian Banse, Xavier Acta Orthop Research Article Background and purpose Massive bone allografts are used when surgery causes large segmental defects. Shape-matching is the primary criterion for selection of an allograft. The current selection method, based on 2-dimensional template comparison, is inefficient for 3-dimensional complex bones. We have analyzed a 3-dimensional (3-D) registration method to match the anatomy of the allograft with that of the recipient. Methods 3-D CT-based registration was performed to match the shapes of both bones. We used the registration to align the allograft volume onto the recipient's bone. Hemipelvic allograft selection was tested in 10 virtual recipients with a panel of 10 potential allografts, including one from the recipient himself (trap graft). 4 observers were asked to visually inspect the superposition of allograft over the recipient, to classify the allografts into 4 categories according to the matching of anatomic zones, and to select the 3 best matching allografts. The results obtained using the registration method were compared with those from a previous study on the template method. Results Using the registration method, the observers systematically detected the trap graft. Selections of the 3 best matching allografts performed using registration and template methods were different. Selection of the 3 best matching allografts was improved by the registration method. Finally, reproducibility of the selection was improved when using the registration method. Interpretation 3-D CT registration provides more useful information than the template method but the final decision lies with the surgeon, who should select the optimal allograft according to his or her own preferences and the needs of the recipient. Informa Healthcare 2010-04 2010-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC2895347/ /pubmed/20175643 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453671003587127 Text en Copyright: © Nordic Orthopedic Federation http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the source is credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Paul, Laurent Docquier, Pierre-Louis Cartiaux, Olivier Cornu, Olivier Delloye, Christian Banse, Xavier Selection of massive bone allografts using shape-matching 3-dimensional registration |
title | Selection of massive bone allografts using shape-matching 3-dimensional registration |
title_full | Selection of massive bone allografts using shape-matching 3-dimensional registration |
title_fullStr | Selection of massive bone allografts using shape-matching 3-dimensional registration |
title_full_unstemmed | Selection of massive bone allografts using shape-matching 3-dimensional registration |
title_short | Selection of massive bone allografts using shape-matching 3-dimensional registration |
title_sort | selection of massive bone allografts using shape-matching 3-dimensional registration |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2895347/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20175643 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453671003587127 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT paullaurent selectionofmassiveboneallograftsusingshapematching3dimensionalregistration AT docquierpierrelouis selectionofmassiveboneallograftsusingshapematching3dimensionalregistration AT cartiauxolivier selectionofmassiveboneallograftsusingshapematching3dimensionalregistration AT cornuolivier selectionofmassiveboneallograftsusingshapematching3dimensionalregistration AT delloyechristian selectionofmassiveboneallograftsusingshapematching3dimensionalregistration AT bansexavier selectionofmassiveboneallograftsusingshapematching3dimensionalregistration |