Cargando…

Evaluation of non-inferiority of intradermal versus adjuvanted seasonal influenza vaccine using two serological techniques: a randomised comparative study

BACKGROUND: Although seasonal influenza vaccine is effective in the elderly, immune responses to vaccination are lower in the elderly than in younger adults. Strategies to optimise responses to vaccination in the elderly include using an adjuvanted vaccine or using an intradermal vaccination route....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Van Damme, Pierre, Arnou, Robert, Kafeja, Froukje, Fiquet, Anne, Richard, Patrick, Thomas, Stéphane, Meghlaoui, Gilles, Samson, Sandrine Isabelle, Ledesma, Emilio
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2895601/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20504306
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-10-134
_version_ 1782183267381805056
author Van Damme, Pierre
Arnou, Robert
Kafeja, Froukje
Fiquet, Anne
Richard, Patrick
Thomas, Stéphane
Meghlaoui, Gilles
Samson, Sandrine Isabelle
Ledesma, Emilio
author_facet Van Damme, Pierre
Arnou, Robert
Kafeja, Froukje
Fiquet, Anne
Richard, Patrick
Thomas, Stéphane
Meghlaoui, Gilles
Samson, Sandrine Isabelle
Ledesma, Emilio
author_sort Van Damme, Pierre
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although seasonal influenza vaccine is effective in the elderly, immune responses to vaccination are lower in the elderly than in younger adults. Strategies to optimise responses to vaccination in the elderly include using an adjuvanted vaccine or using an intradermal vaccination route. The immunogenicity of an intradermal seasonal influenza vaccine was compared with that of an adjuvanted vaccine in the elderly. METHODS: Elderly volunteers (age ≥ 65 years) were randomised to receive a single dose of trivalent seasonal influenza vaccine: either a split-virion vaccine containing 15 μg haemagglutinin [HA]/strain/0.1-ml dose administered intradermally, or a subunit vaccine (15 μg HA/strain/0.5-ml dose) adjuvanted with MF59C.1 and administered intramuscularly. Blood samples were taken before and 21 ± 3 days post-vaccination. Anti-HA antibody titres were assessed using haemagglutination inhibition (HI) and single radial haemolysis (SRH) methods. We aimed to show that the intradermal vaccine was non-inferior to the adjuvanted vaccine. RESULTS: A total of 795 participants were enrolled (intradermal vaccine n = 398; adjuvanted vaccine n = 397). Non-inferiority of the intradermal vaccine was demonstrated for the A/H1N1 and B strains, but not for the A/H3N2 strain (upper bound of the 95% CI = 1.53) using the HI method, and for all three strains by the SRH method. A post-hoc analysis of covariance to adjust for baseline antibody titres demonstrated the non-inferiority of the intradermal vaccine by HI and SRH methods for all three strains. Both vaccines were, in general, well tolerated; the incidence of injection-site reactions was higher for the intradermal (70.1%) than the adjuvanted vaccine (33.8%) but these reactions were mild and of short duration. CONCLUSIONS: The immunogenicity and safety of the intradermal seasonal influenza vaccine in the elderly was comparable with that of the adjuvanted vaccine. Intradermal vaccination to target the immune properties of the skin appears to be an appropriate strategy to address the challenge of declining immune responses in the elderly. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00554333.
format Text
id pubmed-2895601
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28956012010-07-02 Evaluation of non-inferiority of intradermal versus adjuvanted seasonal influenza vaccine using two serological techniques: a randomised comparative study Van Damme, Pierre Arnou, Robert Kafeja, Froukje Fiquet, Anne Richard, Patrick Thomas, Stéphane Meghlaoui, Gilles Samson, Sandrine Isabelle Ledesma, Emilio BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Although seasonal influenza vaccine is effective in the elderly, immune responses to vaccination are lower in the elderly than in younger adults. Strategies to optimise responses to vaccination in the elderly include using an adjuvanted vaccine or using an intradermal vaccination route. The immunogenicity of an intradermal seasonal influenza vaccine was compared with that of an adjuvanted vaccine in the elderly. METHODS: Elderly volunteers (age ≥ 65 years) were randomised to receive a single dose of trivalent seasonal influenza vaccine: either a split-virion vaccine containing 15 μg haemagglutinin [HA]/strain/0.1-ml dose administered intradermally, or a subunit vaccine (15 μg HA/strain/0.5-ml dose) adjuvanted with MF59C.1 and administered intramuscularly. Blood samples were taken before and 21 ± 3 days post-vaccination. Anti-HA antibody titres were assessed using haemagglutination inhibition (HI) and single radial haemolysis (SRH) methods. We aimed to show that the intradermal vaccine was non-inferior to the adjuvanted vaccine. RESULTS: A total of 795 participants were enrolled (intradermal vaccine n = 398; adjuvanted vaccine n = 397). Non-inferiority of the intradermal vaccine was demonstrated for the A/H1N1 and B strains, but not for the A/H3N2 strain (upper bound of the 95% CI = 1.53) using the HI method, and for all three strains by the SRH method. A post-hoc analysis of covariance to adjust for baseline antibody titres demonstrated the non-inferiority of the intradermal vaccine by HI and SRH methods for all three strains. Both vaccines were, in general, well tolerated; the incidence of injection-site reactions was higher for the intradermal (70.1%) than the adjuvanted vaccine (33.8%) but these reactions were mild and of short duration. CONCLUSIONS: The immunogenicity and safety of the intradermal seasonal influenza vaccine in the elderly was comparable with that of the adjuvanted vaccine. Intradermal vaccination to target the immune properties of the skin appears to be an appropriate strategy to address the challenge of declining immune responses in the elderly. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00554333. BioMed Central 2010-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC2895601/ /pubmed/20504306 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-10-134 Text en Copyright ©2010 Van Damme et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Van Damme, Pierre
Arnou, Robert
Kafeja, Froukje
Fiquet, Anne
Richard, Patrick
Thomas, Stéphane
Meghlaoui, Gilles
Samson, Sandrine Isabelle
Ledesma, Emilio
Evaluation of non-inferiority of intradermal versus adjuvanted seasonal influenza vaccine using two serological techniques: a randomised comparative study
title Evaluation of non-inferiority of intradermal versus adjuvanted seasonal influenza vaccine using two serological techniques: a randomised comparative study
title_full Evaluation of non-inferiority of intradermal versus adjuvanted seasonal influenza vaccine using two serological techniques: a randomised comparative study
title_fullStr Evaluation of non-inferiority of intradermal versus adjuvanted seasonal influenza vaccine using two serological techniques: a randomised comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of non-inferiority of intradermal versus adjuvanted seasonal influenza vaccine using two serological techniques: a randomised comparative study
title_short Evaluation of non-inferiority of intradermal versus adjuvanted seasonal influenza vaccine using two serological techniques: a randomised comparative study
title_sort evaluation of non-inferiority of intradermal versus adjuvanted seasonal influenza vaccine using two serological techniques: a randomised comparative study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2895601/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20504306
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-10-134
work_keys_str_mv AT vandammepierre evaluationofnoninferiorityofintradermalversusadjuvantedseasonalinfluenzavaccineusingtwoserologicaltechniquesarandomisedcomparativestudy
AT arnourobert evaluationofnoninferiorityofintradermalversusadjuvantedseasonalinfluenzavaccineusingtwoserologicaltechniquesarandomisedcomparativestudy
AT kafejafroukje evaluationofnoninferiorityofintradermalversusadjuvantedseasonalinfluenzavaccineusingtwoserologicaltechniquesarandomisedcomparativestudy
AT fiquetanne evaluationofnoninferiorityofintradermalversusadjuvantedseasonalinfluenzavaccineusingtwoserologicaltechniquesarandomisedcomparativestudy
AT richardpatrick evaluationofnoninferiorityofintradermalversusadjuvantedseasonalinfluenzavaccineusingtwoserologicaltechniquesarandomisedcomparativestudy
AT thomasstephane evaluationofnoninferiorityofintradermalversusadjuvantedseasonalinfluenzavaccineusingtwoserologicaltechniquesarandomisedcomparativestudy
AT meghlaouigilles evaluationofnoninferiorityofintradermalversusadjuvantedseasonalinfluenzavaccineusingtwoserologicaltechniquesarandomisedcomparativestudy
AT samsonsandrineisabelle evaluationofnoninferiorityofintradermalversusadjuvantedseasonalinfluenzavaccineusingtwoserologicaltechniquesarandomisedcomparativestudy
AT ledesmaemilio evaluationofnoninferiorityofintradermalversusadjuvantedseasonalinfluenzavaccineusingtwoserologicaltechniquesarandomisedcomparativestudy