Cargando…

Methods for evaluating delivery systems for scaling-up malaria control intervention

BACKGROUND: Despite increased resources over the past few years the coverage of malaria control interventions is still inadequate to reach national and international targets and achieve the full potential of the interventions to improve population health. One of the reasons for this inadequate cover...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Webster, Jayne, Chandramohan, Daniel, Hanson, Kara
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2895752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20594374
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-10-S1-S8
_version_ 1782183288726618112
author Webster, Jayne
Chandramohan, Daniel
Hanson, Kara
author_facet Webster, Jayne
Chandramohan, Daniel
Hanson, Kara
author_sort Webster, Jayne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite increased resources over the past few years the coverage of malaria control interventions is still inadequate to reach national and international targets and achieve the full potential of the interventions to improve population health. One of the reasons for this inadequate coverage of efficacious interventions is the limited understanding of the optimum delivery systems of the interventions in different contexts. Although there have been debates about how to deliver interventions, the methods for evaluating the effectiveness of different delivery systems have rarely been discussed. Delivery of interventions is relatively complex and a thorough evaluation would need to look holistically at multiple steps in the delivery process and at multiple factors influencing the process. A better understanding of the strength of the evidence on delivery system effectiveness is needed in order to optimise delivery of efficacious interventions. METHODS: A literature review was conducted of methods used to evaluate delivery systems for insecticide treated nets, intermittent preventive treatment in pregnant women, and treatment for malaria in children. RESULTS: The methodology of delivery system evaluations varied. There were inconsistencies between objectives and methods of the evaluations including inappropriate outcome measures and unnecessary controls. There were few examples where the delivery processes were adequately described, or measured. We propose a cross sectional observational study design with attribution of the outcomes to a specific delivery system as an appropriate method for evaluating delivery systems at scale. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed evaluation framework is adaptable to natural experiments at scale, and can be applied using data from routine surveys such as the Demographic and Health Surveys, modified by the addition of one to two questions for each intervention. This framework has the potential to enable wider application of rigorous evaluations and thereby improve the evidence base on which decisions about delivery systems for malaria control and other public health interventions are taken.
format Text
id pubmed-2895752
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28957522010-07-03 Methods for evaluating delivery systems for scaling-up malaria control intervention Webster, Jayne Chandramohan, Daniel Hanson, Kara BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: Despite increased resources over the past few years the coverage of malaria control interventions is still inadequate to reach national and international targets and achieve the full potential of the interventions to improve population health. One of the reasons for this inadequate coverage of efficacious interventions is the limited understanding of the optimum delivery systems of the interventions in different contexts. Although there have been debates about how to deliver interventions, the methods for evaluating the effectiveness of different delivery systems have rarely been discussed. Delivery of interventions is relatively complex and a thorough evaluation would need to look holistically at multiple steps in the delivery process and at multiple factors influencing the process. A better understanding of the strength of the evidence on delivery system effectiveness is needed in order to optimise delivery of efficacious interventions. METHODS: A literature review was conducted of methods used to evaluate delivery systems for insecticide treated nets, intermittent preventive treatment in pregnant women, and treatment for malaria in children. RESULTS: The methodology of delivery system evaluations varied. There were inconsistencies between objectives and methods of the evaluations including inappropriate outcome measures and unnecessary controls. There were few examples where the delivery processes were adequately described, or measured. We propose a cross sectional observational study design with attribution of the outcomes to a specific delivery system as an appropriate method for evaluating delivery systems at scale. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed evaluation framework is adaptable to natural experiments at scale, and can be applied using data from routine surveys such as the Demographic and Health Surveys, modified by the addition of one to two questions for each intervention. This framework has the potential to enable wider application of rigorous evaluations and thereby improve the evidence base on which decisions about delivery systems for malaria control and other public health interventions are taken. BioMed Central 2010-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC2895752/ /pubmed/20594374 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-10-S1-S8 Text en Copyright ©2010 Webster et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Webster, Jayne
Chandramohan, Daniel
Hanson, Kara
Methods for evaluating delivery systems for scaling-up malaria control intervention
title Methods for evaluating delivery systems for scaling-up malaria control intervention
title_full Methods for evaluating delivery systems for scaling-up malaria control intervention
title_fullStr Methods for evaluating delivery systems for scaling-up malaria control intervention
title_full_unstemmed Methods for evaluating delivery systems for scaling-up malaria control intervention
title_short Methods for evaluating delivery systems for scaling-up malaria control intervention
title_sort methods for evaluating delivery systems for scaling-up malaria control intervention
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2895752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20594374
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-10-S1-S8
work_keys_str_mv AT websterjayne methodsforevaluatingdeliverysystemsforscalingupmalariacontrolintervention
AT chandramohandaniel methodsforevaluatingdeliverysystemsforscalingupmalariacontrolintervention
AT hansonkara methodsforevaluatingdeliverysystemsforscalingupmalariacontrolintervention