Cargando…

Playing Darwin. Part B. 20 years of domestication in Drosophila subobscura

Adaptation to a new environment (as well as its underlying mechanisms) is one of the most important topics in Evolutionary Biology. Understanding the adaptive process of natural populations to captivity is essential not only in general evolutionary studies but also in conservation programmes. Since...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Santos, Marta, Fragata, Inês, Santos, Josiane, Simões, Pedro, Marques, Ana, Lima, Margarida, Matos, Margarida
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2895895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20532673
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12064-010-0086-8
_version_ 1782183300219011072
author Santos, Marta
Fragata, Inês
Santos, Josiane
Simões, Pedro
Marques, Ana
Lima, Margarida
Matos, Margarida
author_facet Santos, Marta
Fragata, Inês
Santos, Josiane
Simões, Pedro
Marques, Ana
Lima, Margarida
Matos, Margarida
author_sort Santos, Marta
collection PubMed
description Adaptation to a new environment (as well as its underlying mechanisms) is one of the most important topics in Evolutionary Biology. Understanding the adaptive process of natural populations to captivity is essential not only in general evolutionary studies but also in conservation programmes. Since 1990, the Group of Experimental Evolution (CBA/FCUL) has been performing long-term, real-time evolutionary studies, with the characterization of laboratory adaptation in populations of Drosophila subobscura founded in different times and from different locations. Initially, these experiments involved phenotypic assays and more recently were expanded to studies at the molecular level (microsatellite and chromosomal polymorphisms) and with different population sizes. Throughout these two decades, a clear pattern of evolutionary convergence to long-established laboratory populations has been consistently observed in several life-history traits. However, contingencies across foundations were also found during the adaptive process. In characters with complex evolutionary trajectories, the data suggested that the comparative method lacked predictive capacity relative to real-time evolutionary trajectories (experimental evolution). Microsatellite analysis revealed general similarity in gene diversity and allele number between studied populations, as well as an unclear association between genetic variability and evolutionary potential. Nevertheless, ongoing studies in all foundations are being carried out to further test this hypothesis. A comparison between recently introduced and long-term populations (founded from the same natural location) has shown higher degree of chromosomal polymorphism in recent ones. Finally, our findings suggest higher heterogeneity between small-sized populations, as well as a slower evolutionary rate in characters close to fitness (such as fecundity and mating behaviour). This comprehensive study is aimed at better understanding the processes and patterns underlying adaptation to captivity, as well as its genetic basis.
format Text
id pubmed-2895895
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28958952010-07-29 Playing Darwin. Part B. 20 years of domestication in Drosophila subobscura Santos, Marta Fragata, Inês Santos, Josiane Simões, Pedro Marques, Ana Lima, Margarida Matos, Margarida Theory Biosci Original Paper Adaptation to a new environment (as well as its underlying mechanisms) is one of the most important topics in Evolutionary Biology. Understanding the adaptive process of natural populations to captivity is essential not only in general evolutionary studies but also in conservation programmes. Since 1990, the Group of Experimental Evolution (CBA/FCUL) has been performing long-term, real-time evolutionary studies, with the characterization of laboratory adaptation in populations of Drosophila subobscura founded in different times and from different locations. Initially, these experiments involved phenotypic assays and more recently were expanded to studies at the molecular level (microsatellite and chromosomal polymorphisms) and with different population sizes. Throughout these two decades, a clear pattern of evolutionary convergence to long-established laboratory populations has been consistently observed in several life-history traits. However, contingencies across foundations were also found during the adaptive process. In characters with complex evolutionary trajectories, the data suggested that the comparative method lacked predictive capacity relative to real-time evolutionary trajectories (experimental evolution). Microsatellite analysis revealed general similarity in gene diversity and allele number between studied populations, as well as an unclear association between genetic variability and evolutionary potential. Nevertheless, ongoing studies in all foundations are being carried out to further test this hypothesis. A comparison between recently introduced and long-term populations (founded from the same natural location) has shown higher degree of chromosomal polymorphism in recent ones. Finally, our findings suggest higher heterogeneity between small-sized populations, as well as a slower evolutionary rate in characters close to fitness (such as fecundity and mating behaviour). This comprehensive study is aimed at better understanding the processes and patterns underlying adaptation to captivity, as well as its genetic basis. Springer-Verlag 2010-06-08 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2895895/ /pubmed/20532673 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12064-010-0086-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Santos, Marta
Fragata, Inês
Santos, Josiane
Simões, Pedro
Marques, Ana
Lima, Margarida
Matos, Margarida
Playing Darwin. Part B. 20 years of domestication in Drosophila subobscura
title Playing Darwin. Part B. 20 years of domestication in Drosophila subobscura
title_full Playing Darwin. Part B. 20 years of domestication in Drosophila subobscura
title_fullStr Playing Darwin. Part B. 20 years of domestication in Drosophila subobscura
title_full_unstemmed Playing Darwin. Part B. 20 years of domestication in Drosophila subobscura
title_short Playing Darwin. Part B. 20 years of domestication in Drosophila subobscura
title_sort playing darwin. part b. 20 years of domestication in drosophila subobscura
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2895895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20532673
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12064-010-0086-8
work_keys_str_mv AT santosmarta playingdarwinpartb20yearsofdomesticationindrosophilasubobscura
AT fragataines playingdarwinpartb20yearsofdomesticationindrosophilasubobscura
AT santosjosiane playingdarwinpartb20yearsofdomesticationindrosophilasubobscura
AT simoespedro playingdarwinpartb20yearsofdomesticationindrosophilasubobscura
AT marquesana playingdarwinpartb20yearsofdomesticationindrosophilasubobscura
AT limamargarida playingdarwinpartb20yearsofdomesticationindrosophilasubobscura
AT matosmargarida playingdarwinpartb20yearsofdomesticationindrosophilasubobscura