Cargando…

Current cardiac imaging techniques for detection of left ventricular mass

Estimation of left ventricular (LV) mass has both prognostic and therapeutic value independent of traditional risk factors. Unfortunately, LV mass evaluation has been underestimated in clinical practice. Assessment of LV mass can be performed by a number of imaging modalities. Despite inherent limit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Celebi, Aksuyek S, Yalcin, Hulya, Yalcin, Fatih
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2896933/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20515461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-7120-8-19
_version_ 1782183409772134400
author Celebi, Aksuyek S
Yalcin, Hulya
Yalcin, Fatih
author_facet Celebi, Aksuyek S
Yalcin, Hulya
Yalcin, Fatih
author_sort Celebi, Aksuyek S
collection PubMed
description Estimation of left ventricular (LV) mass has both prognostic and therapeutic value independent of traditional risk factors. Unfortunately, LV mass evaluation has been underestimated in clinical practice. Assessment of LV mass can be performed by a number of imaging modalities. Despite inherent limitations, conventional echocardiography has fundamentally been established as most widely used diagnostic tool. 3-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) is now feasible, fast and accurate for LV mass evaluation. 3DE is also superior to conventional echocardiography in terms of LV mass assessment, especially in patients with abnormal LV geometry. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and cardiovascular computed tomography (CCT) are currently performed for LV mass assessment and also do not depend on cardiac geometry and display 3-dimensional data, as well. Therefore, CMR is being increasingly employed and is at the present standard of reference in the clinical setting. Although each method demonstrates advantages over another, there are also disadvantages to receive attention. Diagnostic accuracy of methods will also be increased with the introduction of more advanced systems. It is also likely that in the coming years new and more accurate diagnostic tests will become available. In particular, CMR and CCT have been intersecting hot topic between cardiology and radiology clinics. Thus, good communication and collaboration between two specialties is required for selection of an appropriate test.
format Text
id pubmed-2896933
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28969332010-07-06 Current cardiac imaging techniques for detection of left ventricular mass Celebi, Aksuyek S Yalcin, Hulya Yalcin, Fatih Cardiovasc Ultrasound Review Estimation of left ventricular (LV) mass has both prognostic and therapeutic value independent of traditional risk factors. Unfortunately, LV mass evaluation has been underestimated in clinical practice. Assessment of LV mass can be performed by a number of imaging modalities. Despite inherent limitations, conventional echocardiography has fundamentally been established as most widely used diagnostic tool. 3-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) is now feasible, fast and accurate for LV mass evaluation. 3DE is also superior to conventional echocardiography in terms of LV mass assessment, especially in patients with abnormal LV geometry. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and cardiovascular computed tomography (CCT) are currently performed for LV mass assessment and also do not depend on cardiac geometry and display 3-dimensional data, as well. Therefore, CMR is being increasingly employed and is at the present standard of reference in the clinical setting. Although each method demonstrates advantages over another, there are also disadvantages to receive attention. Diagnostic accuracy of methods will also be increased with the introduction of more advanced systems. It is also likely that in the coming years new and more accurate diagnostic tests will become available. In particular, CMR and CCT have been intersecting hot topic between cardiology and radiology clinics. Thus, good communication and collaboration between two specialties is required for selection of an appropriate test. BioMed Central 2010-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2896933/ /pubmed/20515461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-7120-8-19 Text en Copyright ©2010 Celebi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Celebi, Aksuyek S
Yalcin, Hulya
Yalcin, Fatih
Current cardiac imaging techniques for detection of left ventricular mass
title Current cardiac imaging techniques for detection of left ventricular mass
title_full Current cardiac imaging techniques for detection of left ventricular mass
title_fullStr Current cardiac imaging techniques for detection of left ventricular mass
title_full_unstemmed Current cardiac imaging techniques for detection of left ventricular mass
title_short Current cardiac imaging techniques for detection of left ventricular mass
title_sort current cardiac imaging techniques for detection of left ventricular mass
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2896933/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20515461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-7120-8-19
work_keys_str_mv AT celebiaksuyeks currentcardiacimagingtechniquesfordetectionofleftventricularmass
AT yalcinhulya currentcardiacimagingtechniquesfordetectionofleftventricularmass
AT yalcinfatih currentcardiacimagingtechniquesfordetectionofleftventricularmass