Cargando…
Effectiveness of strategies to increase the validity of findings from association studies: size vs. replication
BACKGROUND: The capacity of multiple comparisons to produce false positive findings in genetic association studies is abundantly clear. To address this issue, the concept of false positive report probability (FPRP) measures "the probability of no true association between a genetic variant and d...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2896945/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20509879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-10-47 |
_version_ | 1782183412650475520 |
---|---|
author | Weitkunat, Rolf Kaelin, Etienne Vuillaume, Grégory Kallischnigg, Gerd |
author_facet | Weitkunat, Rolf Kaelin, Etienne Vuillaume, Grégory Kallischnigg, Gerd |
author_sort | Weitkunat, Rolf |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The capacity of multiple comparisons to produce false positive findings in genetic association studies is abundantly clear. To address this issue, the concept of false positive report probability (FPRP) measures "the probability of no true association between a genetic variant and disease given a statistically significant finding". This concept involves the notion of prior probability of an association between a genetic variant and a disease, making it difficult to achieve acceptable levels for the FPRP when the prior probability is low. Increasing the sample size is of limited efficiency to improve the situation. METHODS: To further clarify this problem, the concept of true report probability (TRP) is introduced by analogy to the positive predictive value (PPV) of diagnostic testing. The approach is extended to consider the effects of replication studies. The formula for the TRP after k replication studies is mathematically derived and shown to be only dependent on prior probability, alpha, power, and number of replication studies. RESULTS: Case-control association studies are used to illustrate the TRP concept for replication strategies. Based on power considerations, a relationship is derived between TRP after k replication studies and sample size of each individual study. That relationship enables study designers optimization of study plans. Further, it is demonstrated that replication is efficient in increasing the TRP even in the case of low prior probability of an association and without requiring very large sample sizes for each individual study. CONCLUSIONS: True report probability is a comprehensive and straightforward concept for assessing the validity of positive statistical testing results in association studies. By its extension to replication strategies it can be demonstrated in a transparent manner that replication is highly effective in distinguishing spurious from true associations. Based on the generalized TRP method for replication designs, optimal research strategy and sample size planning become possible. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2896945 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28969452010-07-06 Effectiveness of strategies to increase the validity of findings from association studies: size vs. replication Weitkunat, Rolf Kaelin, Etienne Vuillaume, Grégory Kallischnigg, Gerd BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: The capacity of multiple comparisons to produce false positive findings in genetic association studies is abundantly clear. To address this issue, the concept of false positive report probability (FPRP) measures "the probability of no true association between a genetic variant and disease given a statistically significant finding". This concept involves the notion of prior probability of an association between a genetic variant and a disease, making it difficult to achieve acceptable levels for the FPRP when the prior probability is low. Increasing the sample size is of limited efficiency to improve the situation. METHODS: To further clarify this problem, the concept of true report probability (TRP) is introduced by analogy to the positive predictive value (PPV) of diagnostic testing. The approach is extended to consider the effects of replication studies. The formula for the TRP after k replication studies is mathematically derived and shown to be only dependent on prior probability, alpha, power, and number of replication studies. RESULTS: Case-control association studies are used to illustrate the TRP concept for replication strategies. Based on power considerations, a relationship is derived between TRP after k replication studies and sample size of each individual study. That relationship enables study designers optimization of study plans. Further, it is demonstrated that replication is efficient in increasing the TRP even in the case of low prior probability of an association and without requiring very large sample sizes for each individual study. CONCLUSIONS: True report probability is a comprehensive and straightforward concept for assessing the validity of positive statistical testing results in association studies. By its extension to replication strategies it can be demonstrated in a transparent manner that replication is highly effective in distinguishing spurious from true associations. Based on the generalized TRP method for replication designs, optimal research strategy and sample size planning become possible. BioMed Central 2010-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC2896945/ /pubmed/20509879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-10-47 Text en Copyright ©2010 Weitkunat et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Weitkunat, Rolf Kaelin, Etienne Vuillaume, Grégory Kallischnigg, Gerd Effectiveness of strategies to increase the validity of findings from association studies: size vs. replication |
title | Effectiveness of strategies to increase the validity of findings from association studies: size vs. replication |
title_full | Effectiveness of strategies to increase the validity of findings from association studies: size vs. replication |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of strategies to increase the validity of findings from association studies: size vs. replication |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of strategies to increase the validity of findings from association studies: size vs. replication |
title_short | Effectiveness of strategies to increase the validity of findings from association studies: size vs. replication |
title_sort | effectiveness of strategies to increase the validity of findings from association studies: size vs. replication |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2896945/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20509879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-10-47 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT weitkunatrolf effectivenessofstrategiestoincreasethevalidityoffindingsfromassociationstudiessizevsreplication AT kaelinetienne effectivenessofstrategiestoincreasethevalidityoffindingsfromassociationstudiessizevsreplication AT vuillaumegregory effectivenessofstrategiestoincreasethevalidityoffindingsfromassociationstudiessizevsreplication AT kallischnigggerd effectivenessofstrategiestoincreasethevalidityoffindingsfromassociationstudiessizevsreplication |