Cargando…
Systematic reviews, systematic error and the acquisition of clinical knowledge
BACKGROUND: Since its inception, evidence-based medicine and its application through systematic reviews, has been widely accepted. However, it has also been strongly criticised and resisted by some academic groups and clinicians. One of the main criticisms of evidence-based medicine is that it appea...
Autor principal: | Mickenautsch, Steffen |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2897793/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20537172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-10-53 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Research gaps identified during systematic reviews of clinical trials: glass-ionomer cements
por: Mickenautsch, Steffen
Publicado: (2012) -
Coherence of evidence from systematic reviews as a basis for evidence strength - a case study in support of an epistemological proposition
por: Mickenautsch, Steffen
Publicado: (2012) -
Absence of carious lesions at margins of glass-ionomer cement and amalgam restorations: An update of systematic review evidence
por: Mickenautsch, Steffen, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Caries-preventive effect of glass ionomer and resin-based fissure sealants on permanent teeth: An update of systematic review evidence
por: Mickenautsch, Steffen, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Validity of Sealant Retention as Surrogate for Caries Prevention – A Systematic Review
por: Mickenautsch, Steffen, et al.
Publicado: (2013)