Cargando…

Filling Lateral Canals: Evaluation of Different Filling Techniques

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this in vitro quantitative laboratorial study is to compare the ability of three filling techniques to fill simulated lateral canals. METHODS: Thirty extracted, single-rooted human teeth were used. After cleaning and shaping, three lateral canals were created, one in each...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carvalho-Sousa, Bruno, Almeida-Gomes, Fábio, Carvalho, Pollyana Rabelo Borba, Maníglia-Ferreira, Cláudio, Gurgel-Filho, Eduardo Diogo, Albuquerque, Diana Santana
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dental Investigations Society 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2897857/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20613912
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this in vitro quantitative laboratorial study is to compare the ability of three filling techniques to fill simulated lateral canals. METHODS: Thirty extracted, single-rooted human teeth were used. After cleaning and shaping, three lateral canals were created, one in each third. The teeth were randomly separated into three groups: continuous wave of condensation (Group 1); thermomechanical compaction (Group 2); and lateral condensation (Group 3). The teeth were cross-sectioned, making the cut through points over the lateral canals; thus, 90 specimens were obtained. Each specimen was immersed in a polyester resin, and the blocks were polished. Images were obtained using a stereoscopic lens (40x). Radiographic analysis was performed, followed by a filling linear measure using the Image Tool 3.0 program (University of Texas). Data were statistically analyzed using SPSS 12.0 for Windows (Kruskal-Wallis test). RESULTS: A greater number of simulated lateral canals were obturated in Groups 1 and 2. Group 2 presented the largest percentage of linear measure of lateral canals filling with gutta-percha and sealer. No statistical differences were found between Group 1 and Group 2 when we analyzed the filling with gutta-percha and sealer or just sealer (P>.05). CONCLUSIONS: Thermoplasticized gutta-percha filling techniques (Groups 1 and 2) are better for filling lateral canal with gutta-percha and sealer or with just sealer than lateral condensation (Group 3).