Cargando…
Influence of hydrophobic layer and delayed placement of composite on the marginal adaptation of two self-etch adhesives
AIM: The purpose of this in vitro investigation was to evaluate the influence of hydrophobic layer and delay in placement of composite on marginal adaptation of two self-etch adhesive systems (XENO-III and ALL-BOND SE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty class V cavities were prepared on intact, extracte...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2898093/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20617068 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.55619 |
_version_ | 1782183474995658752 |
---|---|
author | R, Pushpa BS, Suresh Arunagiri, D Manuja, Naveen |
author_facet | R, Pushpa BS, Suresh Arunagiri, D Manuja, Naveen |
author_sort | R, Pushpa |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: The purpose of this in vitro investigation was to evaluate the influence of hydrophobic layer and delay in placement of composite on marginal adaptation of two self-etch adhesive systems (XENO-III and ALL-BOND SE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty class V cavities were prepared on intact, extracted human premolars and were divided into 4 groups of 10 teeth each. Group 1: Application of bonding agents as per manufacturer directions and immediate placement of composite; Group 2: Application of bonding agent and composite similar to group1, with hydrophobic layer curing before composite placement; Group 3: Application of bonding agent similar to group 1, with 2 min delay in composite placement; and Group 4: Application similar to group 2 with 2-min delay in composite placement. The specimens were restored and light cured. After thermocycling and immersion in 2% basic Fuchsin dye solution, the teeth were sectioned and dye penetration was observed under a stereomicroscope at 20× magnification. All the samples were scored and results were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests. RESULTS: In group 1, the microleakage along the both enamel and dentin margin was significantly higher than the other groups for both the adhesive systems. There is no significant difference between groups 2, 3 and 4. CONCLUSION: The addition of a more hydrophobic resin layer and delay in composite placement significantly improves the marginal adaptation of self-etch adhesive resin systems. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2898093 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Medknow Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28980932010-07-08 Influence of hydrophobic layer and delayed placement of composite on the marginal adaptation of two self-etch adhesives R, Pushpa BS, Suresh Arunagiri, D Manuja, Naveen J Conserv Dent Original Article AIM: The purpose of this in vitro investigation was to evaluate the influence of hydrophobic layer and delay in placement of composite on marginal adaptation of two self-etch adhesive systems (XENO-III and ALL-BOND SE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty class V cavities were prepared on intact, extracted human premolars and were divided into 4 groups of 10 teeth each. Group 1: Application of bonding agents as per manufacturer directions and immediate placement of composite; Group 2: Application of bonding agent and composite similar to group1, with hydrophobic layer curing before composite placement; Group 3: Application of bonding agent similar to group 1, with 2 min delay in composite placement; and Group 4: Application similar to group 2 with 2-min delay in composite placement. The specimens were restored and light cured. After thermocycling and immersion in 2% basic Fuchsin dye solution, the teeth were sectioned and dye penetration was observed under a stereomicroscope at 20× magnification. All the samples were scored and results were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests. RESULTS: In group 1, the microleakage along the both enamel and dentin margin was significantly higher than the other groups for both the adhesive systems. There is no significant difference between groups 2, 3 and 4. CONCLUSION: The addition of a more hydrophobic resin layer and delay in composite placement significantly improves the marginal adaptation of self-etch adhesive resin systems. Medknow Publications 2009 /pmc/articles/PMC2898093/ /pubmed/20617068 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.55619 Text en © Indian Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article R, Pushpa BS, Suresh Arunagiri, D Manuja, Naveen Influence of hydrophobic layer and delayed placement of composite on the marginal adaptation of two self-etch adhesives |
title | Influence of hydrophobic layer and delayed placement of composite on the marginal adaptation of two self-etch adhesives |
title_full | Influence of hydrophobic layer and delayed placement of composite on the marginal adaptation of two self-etch adhesives |
title_fullStr | Influence of hydrophobic layer and delayed placement of composite on the marginal adaptation of two self-etch adhesives |
title_full_unstemmed | Influence of hydrophobic layer and delayed placement of composite on the marginal adaptation of two self-etch adhesives |
title_short | Influence of hydrophobic layer and delayed placement of composite on the marginal adaptation of two self-etch adhesives |
title_sort | influence of hydrophobic layer and delayed placement of composite on the marginal adaptation of two self-etch adhesives |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2898093/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20617068 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.55619 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rpushpa influenceofhydrophobiclayeranddelayedplacementofcompositeonthemarginaladaptationoftwoselfetchadhesives AT bssuresh influenceofhydrophobiclayeranddelayedplacementofcompositeonthemarginaladaptationoftwoselfetchadhesives AT arunagirid influenceofhydrophobiclayeranddelayedplacementofcompositeonthemarginaladaptationoftwoselfetchadhesives AT manujanaveen influenceofhydrophobiclayeranddelayedplacementofcompositeonthemarginaladaptationoftwoselfetchadhesives |