Cargando…

Making the Invisible Visible: Verbal but Not Visual Cues Enhance Visual Detection

BACKGROUND: Can hearing a word change what one sees? Although visual sensitivity is known to be enhanced by attending to the location of the target, perceptual enhancements of following cues to the identity of an object have been difficult to find. Here, we show that perceptual sensitivity is enhanc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lupyan, Gary, Spivey, Michael J.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2898810/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20628646
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011452
_version_ 1782183524942479360
author Lupyan, Gary
Spivey, Michael J.
author_facet Lupyan, Gary
Spivey, Michael J.
author_sort Lupyan, Gary
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Can hearing a word change what one sees? Although visual sensitivity is known to be enhanced by attending to the location of the target, perceptual enhancements of following cues to the identity of an object have been difficult to find. Here, we show that perceptual sensitivity is enhanced by verbal, but not visual cues. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Participants completed an object detection task in which they made an object-presence or -absence decision to briefly-presented letters. Hearing the letter name prior to the detection task increased perceptual sensitivity (d′). A visual cue in the form of a preview of the to-be-detected letter did not. Follow-up experiments found that the auditory cuing effect was specific to validly cued stimuli. The magnitude of the cuing effect positively correlated with an individual measure of vividness of mental imagery; introducing uncertainty into the position of the stimulus did not reduce the magnitude of the cuing effect, but eliminated the correlation with mental imagery. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Hearing a word made otherwise invisible objects visible. Interestingly, seeing a preview of the target stimulus did not similarly enhance detection of the target. These results are compatible with an account in which auditory verbal labels modulate lower-level visual processing. The findings show that a verbal cue in the form of hearing a word can influence even the most elementary visual processing and inform our understanding of how language affects perception.
format Text
id pubmed-2898810
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28988102010-07-13 Making the Invisible Visible: Verbal but Not Visual Cues Enhance Visual Detection Lupyan, Gary Spivey, Michael J. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Can hearing a word change what one sees? Although visual sensitivity is known to be enhanced by attending to the location of the target, perceptual enhancements of following cues to the identity of an object have been difficult to find. Here, we show that perceptual sensitivity is enhanced by verbal, but not visual cues. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Participants completed an object detection task in which they made an object-presence or -absence decision to briefly-presented letters. Hearing the letter name prior to the detection task increased perceptual sensitivity (d′). A visual cue in the form of a preview of the to-be-detected letter did not. Follow-up experiments found that the auditory cuing effect was specific to validly cued stimuli. The magnitude of the cuing effect positively correlated with an individual measure of vividness of mental imagery; introducing uncertainty into the position of the stimulus did not reduce the magnitude of the cuing effect, but eliminated the correlation with mental imagery. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Hearing a word made otherwise invisible objects visible. Interestingly, seeing a preview of the target stimulus did not similarly enhance detection of the target. These results are compatible with an account in which auditory verbal labels modulate lower-level visual processing. The findings show that a verbal cue in the form of hearing a word can influence even the most elementary visual processing and inform our understanding of how language affects perception. Public Library of Science 2010-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC2898810/ /pubmed/20628646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011452 Text en Lupyan, Spivey. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lupyan, Gary
Spivey, Michael J.
Making the Invisible Visible: Verbal but Not Visual Cues Enhance Visual Detection
title Making the Invisible Visible: Verbal but Not Visual Cues Enhance Visual Detection
title_full Making the Invisible Visible: Verbal but Not Visual Cues Enhance Visual Detection
title_fullStr Making the Invisible Visible: Verbal but Not Visual Cues Enhance Visual Detection
title_full_unstemmed Making the Invisible Visible: Verbal but Not Visual Cues Enhance Visual Detection
title_short Making the Invisible Visible: Verbal but Not Visual Cues Enhance Visual Detection
title_sort making the invisible visible: verbal but not visual cues enhance visual detection
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2898810/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20628646
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011452
work_keys_str_mv AT lupyangary makingtheinvisiblevisibleverbalbutnotvisualcuesenhancevisualdetection
AT spiveymichaelj makingtheinvisiblevisibleverbalbutnotvisualcuesenhancevisualdetection