Cargando…

Patient Controlled Epidural Analgesia during Labour: Effect of Addition of Background Infusion on Quality of Analgesia & Maternal Satisfaction

Patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) is a well established technique for pain relief during labor. But the inclusion of continuous background infusion to PCEA is controversial. The aim of this study was to assess whether the use of continuous infusion along with PCEA was beneficial for labor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Srivastava, Uma, Gupta, Amrita, Saxena, Surekha, Kumar, Aditya, Singh, Saroj, Saraswat, Namita, Mishra, Abhijeet R, Kannaujia, Ashish, Mishra, Sukhdev
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2900073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20640091
_version_ 1782183580530638848
author Srivastava, Uma
Gupta, Amrita
Saxena, Surekha
Kumar, Aditya
Singh, Saroj
Saraswat, Namita
Mishra, Abhijeet R
Kannaujia, Ashish
Mishra, Sukhdev
author_facet Srivastava, Uma
Gupta, Amrita
Saxena, Surekha
Kumar, Aditya
Singh, Saroj
Saraswat, Namita
Mishra, Abhijeet R
Kannaujia, Ashish
Mishra, Sukhdev
author_sort Srivastava, Uma
collection PubMed
description Patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) is a well established technique for pain relief during labor. But the inclusion of continuous background infusion to PCEA is controversial. The aim of this study was to assess whether the use of continuous infusion along with PCEA was beneficial for laboring women with regards to quality of analgesia, maternal satisfaction and neonatal outcome in comparison to PCEA alone. Fifty five parturients received epidural bolus of 10ml solution containing 0.125% bupivacaine +2 µg.ml(−1) of fentanyl. For maintenance of analgesia the patients of Group PCEA self administered 8 ml bolus with lockout interval of 20 minutes of above solution on demand with no basal infusion. While the patients of Group PCEA + CI received continuous epidural infusion at the rate of 10 ml.hr-1 along with self administered boluses of 3 ml with lockout interval of 10 minutes of similar epidural solution. Patients of both groups were given rescue boluses by the anaesthetists for distressing pain. Verbal analogue pain scores, incidence of distressing pain, need of supplementary/rescue boluses, dose of bupivacaine consumed, maternal satisfaction and neonatal Apgar scores were recorded. No significant difference was observed between mean VAS pain scores during labor, maternal satisfaction, mode of delivery or neonatal Apgar scores. But more patients (n=8) required rescue boluses in PCEA group for distressing pain. The total volume consumed of bupivacaine and opioid was slightly more in PCEA + CI group. In both the techniques the highest sensory level, degree of motor block were comparable & prolongation of labor was not seen. It was concluded that both the techniques provided equivalent labor analgesia, maternal satisfaction and neonatal Apgar scores. PCEA along with continuous infusion at the rate of 10 ml/ hr resulted in lesser incidence of distressing pain and need for rescue analgesic. Although this group consumed higher dose of bupivacaine, it did not affect maternal or neonatal safety.
format Text
id pubmed-2900073
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29000732010-07-16 Patient Controlled Epidural Analgesia during Labour: Effect of Addition of Background Infusion on Quality of Analgesia & Maternal Satisfaction Srivastava, Uma Gupta, Amrita Saxena, Surekha Kumar, Aditya Singh, Saroj Saraswat, Namita Mishra, Abhijeet R Kannaujia, Ashish Mishra, Sukhdev Indian J Anaesth Clinical Investigation Patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) is a well established technique for pain relief during labor. But the inclusion of continuous background infusion to PCEA is controversial. The aim of this study was to assess whether the use of continuous infusion along with PCEA was beneficial for laboring women with regards to quality of analgesia, maternal satisfaction and neonatal outcome in comparison to PCEA alone. Fifty five parturients received epidural bolus of 10ml solution containing 0.125% bupivacaine +2 µg.ml(−1) of fentanyl. For maintenance of analgesia the patients of Group PCEA self administered 8 ml bolus with lockout interval of 20 minutes of above solution on demand with no basal infusion. While the patients of Group PCEA + CI received continuous epidural infusion at the rate of 10 ml.hr-1 along with self administered boluses of 3 ml with lockout interval of 10 minutes of similar epidural solution. Patients of both groups were given rescue boluses by the anaesthetists for distressing pain. Verbal analogue pain scores, incidence of distressing pain, need of supplementary/rescue boluses, dose of bupivacaine consumed, maternal satisfaction and neonatal Apgar scores were recorded. No significant difference was observed between mean VAS pain scores during labor, maternal satisfaction, mode of delivery or neonatal Apgar scores. But more patients (n=8) required rescue boluses in PCEA group for distressing pain. The total volume consumed of bupivacaine and opioid was slightly more in PCEA + CI group. In both the techniques the highest sensory level, degree of motor block were comparable & prolongation of labor was not seen. It was concluded that both the techniques provided equivalent labor analgesia, maternal satisfaction and neonatal Apgar scores. PCEA along with continuous infusion at the rate of 10 ml/ hr resulted in lesser incidence of distressing pain and need for rescue analgesic. Although this group consumed higher dose of bupivacaine, it did not affect maternal or neonatal safety. Medknow Publications 2009-12 /pmc/articles/PMC2900073/ /pubmed/20640091 Text en © Indian Journal of Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Investigation
Srivastava, Uma
Gupta, Amrita
Saxena, Surekha
Kumar, Aditya
Singh, Saroj
Saraswat, Namita
Mishra, Abhijeet R
Kannaujia, Ashish
Mishra, Sukhdev
Patient Controlled Epidural Analgesia during Labour: Effect of Addition of Background Infusion on Quality of Analgesia & Maternal Satisfaction
title Patient Controlled Epidural Analgesia during Labour: Effect of Addition of Background Infusion on Quality of Analgesia & Maternal Satisfaction
title_full Patient Controlled Epidural Analgesia during Labour: Effect of Addition of Background Infusion on Quality of Analgesia & Maternal Satisfaction
title_fullStr Patient Controlled Epidural Analgesia during Labour: Effect of Addition of Background Infusion on Quality of Analgesia & Maternal Satisfaction
title_full_unstemmed Patient Controlled Epidural Analgesia during Labour: Effect of Addition of Background Infusion on Quality of Analgesia & Maternal Satisfaction
title_short Patient Controlled Epidural Analgesia during Labour: Effect of Addition of Background Infusion on Quality of Analgesia & Maternal Satisfaction
title_sort patient controlled epidural analgesia during labour: effect of addition of background infusion on quality of analgesia & maternal satisfaction
topic Clinical Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2900073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20640091
work_keys_str_mv AT srivastavauma patientcontrolledepiduralanalgesiaduringlaboureffectofadditionofbackgroundinfusiononqualityofanalgesiamaternalsatisfaction
AT guptaamrita patientcontrolledepiduralanalgesiaduringlaboureffectofadditionofbackgroundinfusiononqualityofanalgesiamaternalsatisfaction
AT saxenasurekha patientcontrolledepiduralanalgesiaduringlaboureffectofadditionofbackgroundinfusiononqualityofanalgesiamaternalsatisfaction
AT kumaraditya patientcontrolledepiduralanalgesiaduringlaboureffectofadditionofbackgroundinfusiononqualityofanalgesiamaternalsatisfaction
AT singhsaroj patientcontrolledepiduralanalgesiaduringlaboureffectofadditionofbackgroundinfusiononqualityofanalgesiamaternalsatisfaction
AT saraswatnamita patientcontrolledepiduralanalgesiaduringlaboureffectofadditionofbackgroundinfusiononqualityofanalgesiamaternalsatisfaction
AT mishraabhijeetr patientcontrolledepiduralanalgesiaduringlaboureffectofadditionofbackgroundinfusiononqualityofanalgesiamaternalsatisfaction
AT kannaujiaashish patientcontrolledepiduralanalgesiaduringlaboureffectofadditionofbackgroundinfusiononqualityofanalgesiamaternalsatisfaction
AT mishrasukhdev patientcontrolledepiduralanalgesiaduringlaboureffectofadditionofbackgroundinfusiononqualityofanalgesiamaternalsatisfaction