Cargando…

Aerosol Monitoring during Carbon Nanofiber Production: Mobile Direct-Reading Sampling

Detailed investigations were conducted at a facility that manufactures and processes carbon nanofibers (CNFs). Presented research summarizes the direct-reading monitoring aspects of the study. A mobile aerosol sampling platform, equipped with an aerosol instrument array, was used to characterize emi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Evans, Douglas E., Ku, Bon Ki, Birch, M. Eileen, Dunn, Kevin H.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2900095/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20447936
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/meq015
_version_ 1782183585831190528
author Evans, Douglas E.
Ku, Bon Ki
Birch, M. Eileen
Dunn, Kevin H.
author_facet Evans, Douglas E.
Ku, Bon Ki
Birch, M. Eileen
Dunn, Kevin H.
author_sort Evans, Douglas E.
collection PubMed
description Detailed investigations were conducted at a facility that manufactures and processes carbon nanofibers (CNFs). Presented research summarizes the direct-reading monitoring aspects of the study. A mobile aerosol sampling platform, equipped with an aerosol instrument array, was used to characterize emissions at different locations within the facility. Particle number, respirable mass, active surface area, and photoelectric response were monitored with a condensation particle counter (CPC), a photometer, a diffusion charger, and a photoelectric aerosol sensor, respectively. CO and CO(2) were additionally monitored. Combined simultaneous monitoring of these metrics can be utilized to determine source and relative contribution of airborne particles (CNFs and others) within a workplace. Elevated particle number concentrations, up to 1.15 × 10(6) cm(−3), were found within the facility but were not due to CNFs. Ultrafine particle emissions, released during thermal treatment of CNFs, were primarily responsible. In contrast, transient increases in respirable particle mass concentration, with a maximum of 1.1 mg m(−3), were due to CNF release through uncontrolled transfer and bagging. Of the applied metrics, our findings suggest that particle mass was probably the most useful and practical metric for monitoring CNF emissions in this facility. Through chemical means, CNFs may be selectively distinguished from other workplace contaminants (Birch et al., in preparation), and for direct-reading monitoring applications, the photometer was found to provide a reasonable estimate of respirable CNF mass concentration. Particle size distribution measurements were conducted with an electrical low-pressure impactor and a fast particle size spectrometer. Results suggest that the dominant CNF mode by particle number lies between 200 and 250 nm for both aerodynamic and mobility equivalent diameters. Significant emissions of CO were also evident in this facility. Exposure control recommendations were described for processes as required.
format Text
id pubmed-2900095
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29000952010-07-12 Aerosol Monitoring during Carbon Nanofiber Production: Mobile Direct-Reading Sampling Evans, Douglas E. Ku, Bon Ki Birch, M. Eileen Dunn, Kevin H. Ann Occup Hyg Original Articles Detailed investigations were conducted at a facility that manufactures and processes carbon nanofibers (CNFs). Presented research summarizes the direct-reading monitoring aspects of the study. A mobile aerosol sampling platform, equipped with an aerosol instrument array, was used to characterize emissions at different locations within the facility. Particle number, respirable mass, active surface area, and photoelectric response were monitored with a condensation particle counter (CPC), a photometer, a diffusion charger, and a photoelectric aerosol sensor, respectively. CO and CO(2) were additionally monitored. Combined simultaneous monitoring of these metrics can be utilized to determine source and relative contribution of airborne particles (CNFs and others) within a workplace. Elevated particle number concentrations, up to 1.15 × 10(6) cm(−3), were found within the facility but were not due to CNFs. Ultrafine particle emissions, released during thermal treatment of CNFs, were primarily responsible. In contrast, transient increases in respirable particle mass concentration, with a maximum of 1.1 mg m(−3), were due to CNF release through uncontrolled transfer and bagging. Of the applied metrics, our findings suggest that particle mass was probably the most useful and practical metric for monitoring CNF emissions in this facility. Through chemical means, CNFs may be selectively distinguished from other workplace contaminants (Birch et al., in preparation), and for direct-reading monitoring applications, the photometer was found to provide a reasonable estimate of respirable CNF mass concentration. Particle size distribution measurements were conducted with an electrical low-pressure impactor and a fast particle size spectrometer. Results suggest that the dominant CNF mode by particle number lies between 200 and 250 nm for both aerodynamic and mobility equivalent diameters. Significant emissions of CO were also evident in this facility. Exposure control recommendations were described for processes as required. Oxford University Press 2010-07 2010-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC2900095/ /pubmed/20447936 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/meq015 Text en © The Author 2010. Published by Oxford University Press [on behalf of the British Occupational Hygiene Society]. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Evans, Douglas E.
Ku, Bon Ki
Birch, M. Eileen
Dunn, Kevin H.
Aerosol Monitoring during Carbon Nanofiber Production: Mobile Direct-Reading Sampling
title Aerosol Monitoring during Carbon Nanofiber Production: Mobile Direct-Reading Sampling
title_full Aerosol Monitoring during Carbon Nanofiber Production: Mobile Direct-Reading Sampling
title_fullStr Aerosol Monitoring during Carbon Nanofiber Production: Mobile Direct-Reading Sampling
title_full_unstemmed Aerosol Monitoring during Carbon Nanofiber Production: Mobile Direct-Reading Sampling
title_short Aerosol Monitoring during Carbon Nanofiber Production: Mobile Direct-Reading Sampling
title_sort aerosol monitoring during carbon nanofiber production: mobile direct-reading sampling
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2900095/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20447936
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/meq015
work_keys_str_mv AT evansdouglase aerosolmonitoringduringcarbonnanofiberproductionmobiledirectreadingsampling
AT kubonki aerosolmonitoringduringcarbonnanofiberproductionmobiledirectreadingsampling
AT birchmeileen aerosolmonitoringduringcarbonnanofiberproductionmobiledirectreadingsampling
AT dunnkevinh aerosolmonitoringduringcarbonnanofiberproductionmobiledirectreadingsampling