Cargando…
Evaluation of Truview evo2(®) Laryngoscope In Anticipated Difficult Intubation – A Comparison To Macintosh Laryngoscope
SUMMARY: The aim of the study was to assess and compare laryngoscopic view of Truview evo2 laryngoscope with that of Macintosh laryngoscope in patients with one or more predictors of difficult intubation (PDI). Moreover ease of intubation with Truview evo2 in terms of absolute time requirement was a...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2900100/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20640117 |
_version_ | 1782183587022372864 |
---|---|
author | Singh, Ishwar Khaund, Abhijit Gupta, Abhishek |
author_facet | Singh, Ishwar Khaund, Abhijit Gupta, Abhishek |
author_sort | Singh, Ishwar |
collection | PubMed |
description | SUMMARY: The aim of the study was to assess and compare laryngoscopic view of Truview evo2 laryngoscope with that of Macintosh laryngoscope in patients with one or more predictors of difficult intubation (PDI). Moreover ease of intubation with Truview evo2 in terms of absolute time requirement was also aimed at. Patients for elective surgery requiring endotracheal intubation were initially assessed for three PDI parameters – modified Mallampati test, thyro-mental distance & Atlanto-occipital (AO) joint extension. Patients with cumulative PDI scores of 2 to 5 (in a scale of 0 to 8) were evaluated for Cormack & Lehane (CL) grading by Macintosh blade after standard induction. Cases with CL grade of two or more were further evaluated by Truview evo2 laryngoscope and corresponding CL grades were assigned. Intubation attempted under Truview evo2 vision and time required for each successful tracheal intubation (i.e. tracheal intubation completed within one minute) was noted. Total fifty cases were studied. The CL grades assigned by Macintosh blade correlated well with the cumulative PDI scores assigned preoperatively, confirming there predictability. Truview evo2 improved laryngeal view in 92 % cases by one or more CL grade. Intubation with Truview evo2 was possible in 88% cases within stipulated time of one minute and mean time of 28.6 seconds with SD of 11.23 was reasonably quick. No significant complication like oro- pharyngeal trauma or extreme pressor response to laryngoscopy was noticed. To conclude, Truview evo2 proved to be a better tool than conventional laryngoscope in anticipated difficult situations. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2900100 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Medknow Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29001002010-07-16 Evaluation of Truview evo2(®) Laryngoscope In Anticipated Difficult Intubation – A Comparison To Macintosh Laryngoscope Singh, Ishwar Khaund, Abhijit Gupta, Abhishek Indian J Anaesth Clinical Investigation SUMMARY: The aim of the study was to assess and compare laryngoscopic view of Truview evo2 laryngoscope with that of Macintosh laryngoscope in patients with one or more predictors of difficult intubation (PDI). Moreover ease of intubation with Truview evo2 in terms of absolute time requirement was also aimed at. Patients for elective surgery requiring endotracheal intubation were initially assessed for three PDI parameters – modified Mallampati test, thyro-mental distance & Atlanto-occipital (AO) joint extension. Patients with cumulative PDI scores of 2 to 5 (in a scale of 0 to 8) were evaluated for Cormack & Lehane (CL) grading by Macintosh blade after standard induction. Cases with CL grade of two or more were further evaluated by Truview evo2 laryngoscope and corresponding CL grades were assigned. Intubation attempted under Truview evo2 vision and time required for each successful tracheal intubation (i.e. tracheal intubation completed within one minute) was noted. Total fifty cases were studied. The CL grades assigned by Macintosh blade correlated well with the cumulative PDI scores assigned preoperatively, confirming there predictability. Truview evo2 improved laryngeal view in 92 % cases by one or more CL grade. Intubation with Truview evo2 was possible in 88% cases within stipulated time of one minute and mean time of 28.6 seconds with SD of 11.23 was reasonably quick. No significant complication like oro- pharyngeal trauma or extreme pressor response to laryngoscopy was noticed. To conclude, Truview evo2 proved to be a better tool than conventional laryngoscope in anticipated difficult situations. Medknow Publications 2009-04 /pmc/articles/PMC2900100/ /pubmed/20640117 Text en © Indian Journal of Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Investigation Singh, Ishwar Khaund, Abhijit Gupta, Abhishek Evaluation of Truview evo2(®) Laryngoscope In Anticipated Difficult Intubation – A Comparison To Macintosh Laryngoscope |
title | Evaluation of Truview evo2(®) Laryngoscope In Anticipated Difficult Intubation – A Comparison To Macintosh Laryngoscope |
title_full | Evaluation of Truview evo2(®) Laryngoscope In Anticipated Difficult Intubation – A Comparison To Macintosh Laryngoscope |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Truview evo2(®) Laryngoscope In Anticipated Difficult Intubation – A Comparison To Macintosh Laryngoscope |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Truview evo2(®) Laryngoscope In Anticipated Difficult Intubation – A Comparison To Macintosh Laryngoscope |
title_short | Evaluation of Truview evo2(®) Laryngoscope In Anticipated Difficult Intubation – A Comparison To Macintosh Laryngoscope |
title_sort | evaluation of truview evo2(®) laryngoscope in anticipated difficult intubation – a comparison to macintosh laryngoscope |
topic | Clinical Investigation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2900100/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20640117 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT singhishwar evaluationoftruviewevo2laryngoscopeinanticipateddifficultintubationacomparisontomacintoshlaryngoscope AT khaundabhijit evaluationoftruviewevo2laryngoscopeinanticipateddifficultintubationacomparisontomacintoshlaryngoscope AT guptaabhishek evaluationoftruviewevo2laryngoscopeinanticipateddifficultintubationacomparisontomacintoshlaryngoscope |