Cargando…

Drive time to cardiac rehabilitation: at what point does it affect utilization?

BACKGROUND: A 30 minute drive time threshold has often been cited as indicative of accessible health services. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a chronic disease management program designed to enhance and maintain cardiovascular health, and geographic barriers to utilization are often cited. The purpo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brual, Janette, Gravely-Witte, Shannon, Suskin, Neville, Stewart, Donna E, Macpherson, Alison, Grace, Sherry L
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2900239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20525345
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-072X-9-27
_version_ 1782183609038274560
author Brual, Janette
Gravely-Witte, Shannon
Suskin, Neville
Stewart, Donna E
Macpherson, Alison
Grace, Sherry L
author_facet Brual, Janette
Gravely-Witte, Shannon
Suskin, Neville
Stewart, Donna E
Macpherson, Alison
Grace, Sherry L
author_sort Brual, Janette
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A 30 minute drive time threshold has often been cited as indicative of accessible health services. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a chronic disease management program designed to enhance and maintain cardiovascular health, and geographic barriers to utilization are often cited. The purpose of this study was to empirically test the drive time threshold for CR utilization. METHODS: A prospective study, using a multi-level design of coronary artery disease outpatients nested within 97 cardiologists. Participants completed a baseline sociodemographic survey, and reported CR referral, enrollment and participation in a second survey 9 months later. CR utilization was verified with CR sites. Geographic information systems were used to generate drive times at 60, 80 and 100% of the speed limit to the closest CR site from participants' homes, to take into consideration various traffic conditions. Bivariate analysis was used to test for differences in CR referral, enrollment and degree of participation by drive time. Logistic regression was used to test drive time increments where significant differences were found. RESULTS: Drive times were generated for 1209 outpatients. Overall, CR referral was verified for 523 (43.3%) outpatients, with verified enrollment for 444 (36.7%) participating in a mean of 86.4 ± 25.7% of prescribed sessions. There were significant differences in CR referral and enrollment by drive time (ps < .01), but not degree of participation. Logistic regression analysis (ps < .001) revealed that the drive time threshold at 80% of the posted speed limit for physician referral may be 60 minutes (OR = .26, 95% CI: 0.13-0.55), and the threshold for patient CR enrollment may also be 60 minutes (OR = .11, 95% CI: 0.04-0.33). CONCLUSIONS: Physicians may be taking geography into consideration when referring patients to CR. Empirical consideration also reveals that patients are significantly less likely to enroll in CR where they must drive 60 minutes or more to the closest program. Once enrolled, distance has no significant effect on degree of participation.
format Text
id pubmed-2900239
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29002392010-07-09 Drive time to cardiac rehabilitation: at what point does it affect utilization? Brual, Janette Gravely-Witte, Shannon Suskin, Neville Stewart, Donna E Macpherson, Alison Grace, Sherry L Int J Health Geogr Research BACKGROUND: A 30 minute drive time threshold has often been cited as indicative of accessible health services. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a chronic disease management program designed to enhance and maintain cardiovascular health, and geographic barriers to utilization are often cited. The purpose of this study was to empirically test the drive time threshold for CR utilization. METHODS: A prospective study, using a multi-level design of coronary artery disease outpatients nested within 97 cardiologists. Participants completed a baseline sociodemographic survey, and reported CR referral, enrollment and participation in a second survey 9 months later. CR utilization was verified with CR sites. Geographic information systems were used to generate drive times at 60, 80 and 100% of the speed limit to the closest CR site from participants' homes, to take into consideration various traffic conditions. Bivariate analysis was used to test for differences in CR referral, enrollment and degree of participation by drive time. Logistic regression was used to test drive time increments where significant differences were found. RESULTS: Drive times were generated for 1209 outpatients. Overall, CR referral was verified for 523 (43.3%) outpatients, with verified enrollment for 444 (36.7%) participating in a mean of 86.4 ± 25.7% of prescribed sessions. There were significant differences in CR referral and enrollment by drive time (ps < .01), but not degree of participation. Logistic regression analysis (ps < .001) revealed that the drive time threshold at 80% of the posted speed limit for physician referral may be 60 minutes (OR = .26, 95% CI: 0.13-0.55), and the threshold for patient CR enrollment may also be 60 minutes (OR = .11, 95% CI: 0.04-0.33). CONCLUSIONS: Physicians may be taking geography into consideration when referring patients to CR. Empirical consideration also reveals that patients are significantly less likely to enroll in CR where they must drive 60 minutes or more to the closest program. Once enrolled, distance has no significant effect on degree of participation. BioMed Central 2010-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC2900239/ /pubmed/20525345 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-072X-9-27 Text en Copyright ©2010 Brual et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Brual, Janette
Gravely-Witte, Shannon
Suskin, Neville
Stewart, Donna E
Macpherson, Alison
Grace, Sherry L
Drive time to cardiac rehabilitation: at what point does it affect utilization?
title Drive time to cardiac rehabilitation: at what point does it affect utilization?
title_full Drive time to cardiac rehabilitation: at what point does it affect utilization?
title_fullStr Drive time to cardiac rehabilitation: at what point does it affect utilization?
title_full_unstemmed Drive time to cardiac rehabilitation: at what point does it affect utilization?
title_short Drive time to cardiac rehabilitation: at what point does it affect utilization?
title_sort drive time to cardiac rehabilitation: at what point does it affect utilization?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2900239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20525345
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-072X-9-27
work_keys_str_mv AT brualjanette drivetimetocardiacrehabilitationatwhatpointdoesitaffectutilization
AT gravelywitteshannon drivetimetocardiacrehabilitationatwhatpointdoesitaffectutilization
AT suskinneville drivetimetocardiacrehabilitationatwhatpointdoesitaffectutilization
AT stewartdonnae drivetimetocardiacrehabilitationatwhatpointdoesitaffectutilization
AT macphersonalison drivetimetocardiacrehabilitationatwhatpointdoesitaffectutilization
AT gracesherryl drivetimetocardiacrehabilitationatwhatpointdoesitaffectutilization