Cargando…
Helical tomotherapy for single and multiple liver tumours
PURPOSE: Dosimetric evaluations of single and multiple liver tumours performed using intensity-modulated helical tomotherapy (HT) were quantitatively investigated. Step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SaS-IMRT) was used as a benchmark. METHODS: Sixteen patients separated into two groups...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2900282/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20576108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-5-58 |
_version_ | 1782183617076658176 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Tsair-Fwu Chao, Pei-Ju Fang, Fu-Min Su, Te-Jen Leung, Stephen W Hsu, Hsuan-Chih |
author_facet | Lee, Tsair-Fwu Chao, Pei-Ju Fang, Fu-Min Su, Te-Jen Leung, Stephen W Hsu, Hsuan-Chih |
author_sort | Lee, Tsair-Fwu |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Dosimetric evaluations of single and multiple liver tumours performed using intensity-modulated helical tomotherapy (HT) were quantitatively investigated. Step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SaS-IMRT) was used as a benchmark. METHODS: Sixteen patients separated into two groups with primary hepatocellular carcinomas or metastatic liver tumours previously treated using SaS-IMRT were examined and re-planned by HT. The dosimetric indices used included the conformity index (CI) and homogeneity index (HI) for the planned target volume (PTV), max/mean dose, quality index (QI), normal tissue complication probability (NTCP), V(30 Gy), and V(50% )for the specified organs at risk (OARs). The monitor units per fraction (MU/fr) and delivery time were also analysed. RESULTS: For the single tumour group, both planning systems satisfied the required PTV prescription, but no statistical significance was shown by the indexes checking. A shorter delivery time and lower MU/fr value were achieved by the SaS-IMRT. For the group of multiple tumours, the average improvement in CI and HI was 14% and 4% for HT versus SaS-IMRT, respectively. Lower V(50%), V(30 Gy )and QI values were found, indicating a significant dosimetric gain in HT. The NTCP value of the normal liver was 20.27 ± 13.29% for SaS-IMRT and 2.38 ± 2.25% for HT, indicating fewer tissue complications following HT. The latter also required a shorter delivery time. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests dosimetric benefits of HT over SaS-IMRT plans in the case of multiple liver tumours, especially with regards sparing of OARs. No significant dosimetric difference was revealed in the case of single liver tumour, but SaS-IMRT showed better efficiency in terms of MU/fr and delivery time. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2900282 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29002822010-07-09 Helical tomotherapy for single and multiple liver tumours Lee, Tsair-Fwu Chao, Pei-Ju Fang, Fu-Min Su, Te-Jen Leung, Stephen W Hsu, Hsuan-Chih Radiat Oncol Research PURPOSE: Dosimetric evaluations of single and multiple liver tumours performed using intensity-modulated helical tomotherapy (HT) were quantitatively investigated. Step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SaS-IMRT) was used as a benchmark. METHODS: Sixteen patients separated into two groups with primary hepatocellular carcinomas or metastatic liver tumours previously treated using SaS-IMRT were examined and re-planned by HT. The dosimetric indices used included the conformity index (CI) and homogeneity index (HI) for the planned target volume (PTV), max/mean dose, quality index (QI), normal tissue complication probability (NTCP), V(30 Gy), and V(50% )for the specified organs at risk (OARs). The monitor units per fraction (MU/fr) and delivery time were also analysed. RESULTS: For the single tumour group, both planning systems satisfied the required PTV prescription, but no statistical significance was shown by the indexes checking. A shorter delivery time and lower MU/fr value were achieved by the SaS-IMRT. For the group of multiple tumours, the average improvement in CI and HI was 14% and 4% for HT versus SaS-IMRT, respectively. Lower V(50%), V(30 Gy )and QI values were found, indicating a significant dosimetric gain in HT. The NTCP value of the normal liver was 20.27 ± 13.29% for SaS-IMRT and 2.38 ± 2.25% for HT, indicating fewer tissue complications following HT. The latter also required a shorter delivery time. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests dosimetric benefits of HT over SaS-IMRT plans in the case of multiple liver tumours, especially with regards sparing of OARs. No significant dosimetric difference was revealed in the case of single liver tumour, but SaS-IMRT showed better efficiency in terms of MU/fr and delivery time. BioMed Central 2010-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC2900282/ /pubmed/20576108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-5-58 Text en Copyright ©2010 Lee et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Lee, Tsair-Fwu Chao, Pei-Ju Fang, Fu-Min Su, Te-Jen Leung, Stephen W Hsu, Hsuan-Chih Helical tomotherapy for single and multiple liver tumours |
title | Helical tomotherapy for single and multiple liver tumours |
title_full | Helical tomotherapy for single and multiple liver tumours |
title_fullStr | Helical tomotherapy for single and multiple liver tumours |
title_full_unstemmed | Helical tomotherapy for single and multiple liver tumours |
title_short | Helical tomotherapy for single and multiple liver tumours |
title_sort | helical tomotherapy for single and multiple liver tumours |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2900282/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20576108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-5-58 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leetsairfwu helicaltomotherapyforsingleandmultiplelivertumours AT chaopeiju helicaltomotherapyforsingleandmultiplelivertumours AT fangfumin helicaltomotherapyforsingleandmultiplelivertumours AT sutejen helicaltomotherapyforsingleandmultiplelivertumours AT leungstephenw helicaltomotherapyforsingleandmultiplelivertumours AT hsuhsuanchih helicaltomotherapyforsingleandmultiplelivertumours |