Cargando…
Estimating Dynamic Gait Stability Using Data from Non-aligned Inertial Sensors
Recently, two methods for quantifying the stability of a dynamical system have been applied to human locomotion: local stability (quantified by finite time maximum Lyapunov exponents, λ(s) and λ(L)) and orbital stability (quantified by maximum Floquet multipliers, MaxFm). In most studies published t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2900599/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20354902 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10439-010-0018-2 |
_version_ | 1782183631134916608 |
---|---|
author | Bruijn, Sjoerd M. Ten Kate, Warner R. Th. Faber, Gert S. Meijer, Onno G. Beek, Peter J. van Dieën, Jaap H. |
author_facet | Bruijn, Sjoerd M. Ten Kate, Warner R. Th. Faber, Gert S. Meijer, Onno G. Beek, Peter J. van Dieën, Jaap H. |
author_sort | Bruijn, Sjoerd M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Recently, two methods for quantifying the stability of a dynamical system have been applied to human locomotion: local stability (quantified by finite time maximum Lyapunov exponents, λ(s) and λ(L)) and orbital stability (quantified by maximum Floquet multipliers, MaxFm). In most studies published to date, data from optoelectronic measurement systems were used to calculate these measures. However, using wireless inertial sensors may be more practical as they are easier to use, also in ambulatory applications. While inertial sensors have been employed in some studies, it is unknown whether they lead to similar stability estimates as obtained with optoelectronic measurement systems. In the present study, we compared stability measures of human walking estimated from an optoelectronic measurement system with those calculated from an inertial sensor measurement system. Subjects walked on a treadmill at three different speeds while kinematics were recorded using both measurement systems. From the angular velocities and linear accelerations, λ(s), λ(L), and MaxFm were calculated. Both measurement systems showed the same effects of walking speed for all variables. Estimates from both measurement systems correlated high for λ(s) and λ(L,) (R > 0.85) but less strongly for MaxFm (R = 0.66). These results indicate that inertial sensors constitute a valid alternative for an optoelectronic measurement system when assessing dynamic stability in human locomotion, and may thus be used instead, which paves the way to studying gait stability during natural, everyday walking. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2900599 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29005992010-07-30 Estimating Dynamic Gait Stability Using Data from Non-aligned Inertial Sensors Bruijn, Sjoerd M. Ten Kate, Warner R. Th. Faber, Gert S. Meijer, Onno G. Beek, Peter J. van Dieën, Jaap H. Ann Biomed Eng Article Recently, two methods for quantifying the stability of a dynamical system have been applied to human locomotion: local stability (quantified by finite time maximum Lyapunov exponents, λ(s) and λ(L)) and orbital stability (quantified by maximum Floquet multipliers, MaxFm). In most studies published to date, data from optoelectronic measurement systems were used to calculate these measures. However, using wireless inertial sensors may be more practical as they are easier to use, also in ambulatory applications. While inertial sensors have been employed in some studies, it is unknown whether they lead to similar stability estimates as obtained with optoelectronic measurement systems. In the present study, we compared stability measures of human walking estimated from an optoelectronic measurement system with those calculated from an inertial sensor measurement system. Subjects walked on a treadmill at three different speeds while kinematics were recorded using both measurement systems. From the angular velocities and linear accelerations, λ(s), λ(L), and MaxFm were calculated. Both measurement systems showed the same effects of walking speed for all variables. Estimates from both measurement systems correlated high for λ(s) and λ(L,) (R > 0.85) but less strongly for MaxFm (R = 0.66). These results indicate that inertial sensors constitute a valid alternative for an optoelectronic measurement system when assessing dynamic stability in human locomotion, and may thus be used instead, which paves the way to studying gait stability during natural, everyday walking. Springer US 2010-03-31 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2900599/ /pubmed/20354902 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10439-010-0018-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Article Bruijn, Sjoerd M. Ten Kate, Warner R. Th. Faber, Gert S. Meijer, Onno G. Beek, Peter J. van Dieën, Jaap H. Estimating Dynamic Gait Stability Using Data from Non-aligned Inertial Sensors |
title | Estimating Dynamic Gait Stability Using Data from Non-aligned Inertial Sensors |
title_full | Estimating Dynamic Gait Stability Using Data from Non-aligned Inertial Sensors |
title_fullStr | Estimating Dynamic Gait Stability Using Data from Non-aligned Inertial Sensors |
title_full_unstemmed | Estimating Dynamic Gait Stability Using Data from Non-aligned Inertial Sensors |
title_short | Estimating Dynamic Gait Stability Using Data from Non-aligned Inertial Sensors |
title_sort | estimating dynamic gait stability using data from non-aligned inertial sensors |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2900599/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20354902 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10439-010-0018-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bruijnsjoerdm estimatingdynamicgaitstabilityusingdatafromnonalignedinertialsensors AT tenkatewarnerrth estimatingdynamicgaitstabilityusingdatafromnonalignedinertialsensors AT fabergerts estimatingdynamicgaitstabilityusingdatafromnonalignedinertialsensors AT meijeronnog estimatingdynamicgaitstabilityusingdatafromnonalignedinertialsensors AT beekpeterj estimatingdynamicgaitstabilityusingdatafromnonalignedinertialsensors AT vandieenjaaph estimatingdynamicgaitstabilityusingdatafromnonalignedinertialsensors |