Cargando…

Prospective randomized comparative study of use of PLMA and ET tube for airway management in children under general anaesthesia

ProSeal(TM) Laryngeal Mask Airway (PLMA) for children had been introduced in 2004, by Dr. Archie Brain. It has, in addition to Classic Laryngeal Mask Airway (CLMA), a drainage tube for providing a bypass channel for gastric contents to prevent regurgitation and pulmonary aspiration. A randomized pro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patel, Mamta G, Swadia, VN, Bansal, Geetika
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2900732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20661347
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.63643
_version_ 1782183631924494336
author Patel, Mamta G
Swadia, VN
Bansal, Geetika
author_facet Patel, Mamta G
Swadia, VN
Bansal, Geetika
author_sort Patel, Mamta G
collection PubMed
description ProSeal(TM) Laryngeal Mask Airway (PLMA) for children had been introduced in 2004, by Dr. Archie Brain. It has, in addition to Classic Laryngeal Mask Airway (CLMA), a drainage tube for providing a bypass channel for gastric contents to prevent regurgitation and pulmonary aspiration. A randomized prospective study was performed comprising of 60 ASA – I/II patients, between the age groups of 3 and 10 years, of either sex. All the patients were premedicated with oral Midazolam and Glycopyrollate. General anaesthesia with caudal epidural analgesia was given in all the cases. Inhalation with 8% Sevoflurane was used as a sole induction agent in all the patients. They were randomly divided into two groups. PLMA was inserted in patients of Group P and Endotracheal Tube (ETT) in patients of Group I. In all cases, after PLMA / ETT insertion; caudal epidural analgesia was given and general anaesthesia (GA) using Sevoflurane was provided for maintenance of anaesthesia. Muscle relaxant was not used in our study. We studied parameters such as number of attempts, ease of insertion and conditions during insertion, haemodynamic parameters, changes in SpO(2), EtCO(2), gastric insufflation, regurgitation, pulmonary aspiration, postoperative airway complications and so on. We found that insertion of PLMA as well as ETT was performed in the first attempt in all the patients. Ease of insertion and conditions during insertion were comparable in both the groups. Changes in SpO(2) and EtCO(2) were comparable. However, highly significant changes in haemodynamic parameters were observed in the ETT group. Complications such as sore throat (13.33% cases), coughing (40% cases), vomiting (3.33% cases) and hypoxia (3.33% cases) were observed in the ETT group. No gastric insufflation or regurgitation was noted in our study. Thus, we concluded that PLMA could be used as an effective and safe airway device in children compared to ETT undergoing general anaesthesia.
format Text
id pubmed-2900732
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29007322010-07-26 Prospective randomized comparative study of use of PLMA and ET tube for airway management in children under general anaesthesia Patel, Mamta G Swadia, VN Bansal, Geetika Indian J Anaesth Clinical Investigation ProSeal(TM) Laryngeal Mask Airway (PLMA) for children had been introduced in 2004, by Dr. Archie Brain. It has, in addition to Classic Laryngeal Mask Airway (CLMA), a drainage tube for providing a bypass channel for gastric contents to prevent regurgitation and pulmonary aspiration. A randomized prospective study was performed comprising of 60 ASA – I/II patients, between the age groups of 3 and 10 years, of either sex. All the patients were premedicated with oral Midazolam and Glycopyrollate. General anaesthesia with caudal epidural analgesia was given in all the cases. Inhalation with 8% Sevoflurane was used as a sole induction agent in all the patients. They were randomly divided into two groups. PLMA was inserted in patients of Group P and Endotracheal Tube (ETT) in patients of Group I. In all cases, after PLMA / ETT insertion; caudal epidural analgesia was given and general anaesthesia (GA) using Sevoflurane was provided for maintenance of anaesthesia. Muscle relaxant was not used in our study. We studied parameters such as number of attempts, ease of insertion and conditions during insertion, haemodynamic parameters, changes in SpO(2), EtCO(2), gastric insufflation, regurgitation, pulmonary aspiration, postoperative airway complications and so on. We found that insertion of PLMA as well as ETT was performed in the first attempt in all the patients. Ease of insertion and conditions during insertion were comparable in both the groups. Changes in SpO(2) and EtCO(2) were comparable. However, highly significant changes in haemodynamic parameters were observed in the ETT group. Complications such as sore throat (13.33% cases), coughing (40% cases), vomiting (3.33% cases) and hypoxia (3.33% cases) were observed in the ETT group. No gastric insufflation or regurgitation was noted in our study. Thus, we concluded that PLMA could be used as an effective and safe airway device in children compared to ETT undergoing general anaesthesia. Medknow Publications 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2900732/ /pubmed/20661347 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.63643 Text en © Indian Journal of Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Investigation
Patel, Mamta G
Swadia, VN
Bansal, Geetika
Prospective randomized comparative study of use of PLMA and ET tube for airway management in children under general anaesthesia
title Prospective randomized comparative study of use of PLMA and ET tube for airway management in children under general anaesthesia
title_full Prospective randomized comparative study of use of PLMA and ET tube for airway management in children under general anaesthesia
title_fullStr Prospective randomized comparative study of use of PLMA and ET tube for airway management in children under general anaesthesia
title_full_unstemmed Prospective randomized comparative study of use of PLMA and ET tube for airway management in children under general anaesthesia
title_short Prospective randomized comparative study of use of PLMA and ET tube for airway management in children under general anaesthesia
title_sort prospective randomized comparative study of use of plma and et tube for airway management in children under general anaesthesia
topic Clinical Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2900732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20661347
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.63643
work_keys_str_mv AT patelmamtag prospectiverandomizedcomparativestudyofuseofplmaandettubeforairwaymanagementinchildrenundergeneralanaesthesia
AT swadiavn prospectiverandomizedcomparativestudyofuseofplmaandettubeforairwaymanagementinchildrenundergeneralanaesthesia
AT bansalgeetika prospectiverandomizedcomparativestudyofuseofplmaandettubeforairwaymanagementinchildrenundergeneralanaesthesia