Cargando…
A prospective cohort study to investigate cost-minimisation, of Traditional open, open fAst track recovery and laParoscopic fASt track multimodal management, for surgical patients with colon carcinomas (TAPAS study)
BACKGROUND: The present developments in colon surgery are characterized by two innovations: the introduction of the laparoscopic operation technique and fast recovery programs such as the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) recovery program. The Tapas-study was conceived to determine which of the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2901198/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20546569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-10-18 |
_version_ | 1782183657270673408 |
---|---|
author | Reurings, Jurrian C Spanjersberg, Willem R Oostvogel, Henk JM Buskens, Erik Maring, John Kruijt, Flip Rosman, Camiel van Duivendijk, Peter Dejong, Cees HC van Laarhoven, Cees JHM |
author_facet | Reurings, Jurrian C Spanjersberg, Willem R Oostvogel, Henk JM Buskens, Erik Maring, John Kruijt, Flip Rosman, Camiel van Duivendijk, Peter Dejong, Cees HC van Laarhoven, Cees JHM |
author_sort | Reurings, Jurrian C |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The present developments in colon surgery are characterized by two innovations: the introduction of the laparoscopic operation technique and fast recovery programs such as the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) recovery program. The Tapas-study was conceived to determine which of the three treatment programs: open conventional surgery, open 'ERAS' surgery or laparoscopic 'ERAS' surgery for patients with colon carcinomas is most cost minimizing? METHOD/DESIGN: The Tapas-study is a three-arm multicenter prospective cohort study. All patients with colon carcinoma, eligible for surgical treatment within the study period in four general teaching hospitals and one university hospital will be included. This design produces three cohorts: Conventional open surgery is the control exposure (cohort 1). Open surgery with ERAS recovery (cohort 2) and laparoscopic surgery with ERAS recovery (cohort 3) are the alternative exposures. Three separate time periods are used in order to prevent attrition bias. Primary outcome parameters are the two main cost factors: direct medical costs (real cost price calculation) and the indirect non medical costs (friction method). Secondary outcome parameters are mortality, complications, surgical-oncological resection margins, hospital stay, readmission rates, time back to work/recovery, health status and quality of life. Based on an estimated difference in direct medical costs (highest cost factor) of 38% between open and laparoscopic surgery (alfa = 0.01, beta = 0.05), a group size of 3×40 = 120 patients is calculated. DISCUSSION: The Tapas-study is three-arm multicenter cohort study that will provide a cost evaluation of three treatment programs for patients with colon carcinoma, which may serve as a guideline for choice of treatment and investment strategies in hospitals. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN44649165. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2901198 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29011982010-07-10 A prospective cohort study to investigate cost-minimisation, of Traditional open, open fAst track recovery and laParoscopic fASt track multimodal management, for surgical patients with colon carcinomas (TAPAS study) Reurings, Jurrian C Spanjersberg, Willem R Oostvogel, Henk JM Buskens, Erik Maring, John Kruijt, Flip Rosman, Camiel van Duivendijk, Peter Dejong, Cees HC van Laarhoven, Cees JHM BMC Surg Study protocol BACKGROUND: The present developments in colon surgery are characterized by two innovations: the introduction of the laparoscopic operation technique and fast recovery programs such as the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) recovery program. The Tapas-study was conceived to determine which of the three treatment programs: open conventional surgery, open 'ERAS' surgery or laparoscopic 'ERAS' surgery for patients with colon carcinomas is most cost minimizing? METHOD/DESIGN: The Tapas-study is a three-arm multicenter prospective cohort study. All patients with colon carcinoma, eligible for surgical treatment within the study period in four general teaching hospitals and one university hospital will be included. This design produces three cohorts: Conventional open surgery is the control exposure (cohort 1). Open surgery with ERAS recovery (cohort 2) and laparoscopic surgery with ERAS recovery (cohort 3) are the alternative exposures. Three separate time periods are used in order to prevent attrition bias. Primary outcome parameters are the two main cost factors: direct medical costs (real cost price calculation) and the indirect non medical costs (friction method). Secondary outcome parameters are mortality, complications, surgical-oncological resection margins, hospital stay, readmission rates, time back to work/recovery, health status and quality of life. Based on an estimated difference in direct medical costs (highest cost factor) of 38% between open and laparoscopic surgery (alfa = 0.01, beta = 0.05), a group size of 3×40 = 120 patients is calculated. DISCUSSION: The Tapas-study is three-arm multicenter cohort study that will provide a cost evaluation of three treatment programs for patients with colon carcinoma, which may serve as a guideline for choice of treatment and investment strategies in hospitals. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN44649165. BioMed Central 2010-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC2901198/ /pubmed/20546569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-10-18 Text en Copyright ©2010 Reurings et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Study protocol Reurings, Jurrian C Spanjersberg, Willem R Oostvogel, Henk JM Buskens, Erik Maring, John Kruijt, Flip Rosman, Camiel van Duivendijk, Peter Dejong, Cees HC van Laarhoven, Cees JHM A prospective cohort study to investigate cost-minimisation, of Traditional open, open fAst track recovery and laParoscopic fASt track multimodal management, for surgical patients with colon carcinomas (TAPAS study) |
title | A prospective cohort study to investigate cost-minimisation, of Traditional open, open fAst track recovery and laParoscopic fASt track multimodal management, for surgical patients with colon carcinomas (TAPAS study) |
title_full | A prospective cohort study to investigate cost-minimisation, of Traditional open, open fAst track recovery and laParoscopic fASt track multimodal management, for surgical patients with colon carcinomas (TAPAS study) |
title_fullStr | A prospective cohort study to investigate cost-minimisation, of Traditional open, open fAst track recovery and laParoscopic fASt track multimodal management, for surgical patients with colon carcinomas (TAPAS study) |
title_full_unstemmed | A prospective cohort study to investigate cost-minimisation, of Traditional open, open fAst track recovery and laParoscopic fASt track multimodal management, for surgical patients with colon carcinomas (TAPAS study) |
title_short | A prospective cohort study to investigate cost-minimisation, of Traditional open, open fAst track recovery and laParoscopic fASt track multimodal management, for surgical patients with colon carcinomas (TAPAS study) |
title_sort | prospective cohort study to investigate cost-minimisation, of traditional open, open fast track recovery and laparoscopic fast track multimodal management, for surgical patients with colon carcinomas (tapas study) |
topic | Study protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2901198/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20546569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-10-18 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reuringsjurrianc aprospectivecohortstudytoinvestigatecostminimisationoftraditionalopenopenfasttrackrecoveryandlaparoscopicfasttrackmultimodalmanagementforsurgicalpatientswithcoloncarcinomastapasstudy AT spanjersbergwillemr aprospectivecohortstudytoinvestigatecostminimisationoftraditionalopenopenfasttrackrecoveryandlaparoscopicfasttrackmultimodalmanagementforsurgicalpatientswithcoloncarcinomastapasstudy AT oostvogelhenkjm aprospectivecohortstudytoinvestigatecostminimisationoftraditionalopenopenfasttrackrecoveryandlaparoscopicfasttrackmultimodalmanagementforsurgicalpatientswithcoloncarcinomastapasstudy AT buskenserik aprospectivecohortstudytoinvestigatecostminimisationoftraditionalopenopenfasttrackrecoveryandlaparoscopicfasttrackmultimodalmanagementforsurgicalpatientswithcoloncarcinomastapasstudy AT maringjohn aprospectivecohortstudytoinvestigatecostminimisationoftraditionalopenopenfasttrackrecoveryandlaparoscopicfasttrackmultimodalmanagementforsurgicalpatientswithcoloncarcinomastapasstudy AT kruijtflip aprospectivecohortstudytoinvestigatecostminimisationoftraditionalopenopenfasttrackrecoveryandlaparoscopicfasttrackmultimodalmanagementforsurgicalpatientswithcoloncarcinomastapasstudy AT rosmancamiel aprospectivecohortstudytoinvestigatecostminimisationoftraditionalopenopenfasttrackrecoveryandlaparoscopicfasttrackmultimodalmanagementforsurgicalpatientswithcoloncarcinomastapasstudy AT vanduivendijkpeter aprospectivecohortstudytoinvestigatecostminimisationoftraditionalopenopenfasttrackrecoveryandlaparoscopicfasttrackmultimodalmanagementforsurgicalpatientswithcoloncarcinomastapasstudy AT dejongceeshc aprospectivecohortstudytoinvestigatecostminimisationoftraditionalopenopenfasttrackrecoveryandlaparoscopicfasttrackmultimodalmanagementforsurgicalpatientswithcoloncarcinomastapasstudy AT vanlaarhovenceesjhm aprospectivecohortstudytoinvestigatecostminimisationoftraditionalopenopenfasttrackrecoveryandlaparoscopicfasttrackmultimodalmanagementforsurgicalpatientswithcoloncarcinomastapasstudy AT reuringsjurrianc prospectivecohortstudytoinvestigatecostminimisationoftraditionalopenopenfasttrackrecoveryandlaparoscopicfasttrackmultimodalmanagementforsurgicalpatientswithcoloncarcinomastapasstudy AT spanjersbergwillemr prospectivecohortstudytoinvestigatecostminimisationoftraditionalopenopenfasttrackrecoveryandlaparoscopicfasttrackmultimodalmanagementforsurgicalpatientswithcoloncarcinomastapasstudy AT oostvogelhenkjm prospectivecohortstudytoinvestigatecostminimisationoftraditionalopenopenfasttrackrecoveryandlaparoscopicfasttrackmultimodalmanagementforsurgicalpatientswithcoloncarcinomastapasstudy AT buskenserik prospectivecohortstudytoinvestigatecostminimisationoftraditionalopenopenfasttrackrecoveryandlaparoscopicfasttrackmultimodalmanagementforsurgicalpatientswithcoloncarcinomastapasstudy AT maringjohn prospectivecohortstudytoinvestigatecostminimisationoftraditionalopenopenfasttrackrecoveryandlaparoscopicfasttrackmultimodalmanagementforsurgicalpatientswithcoloncarcinomastapasstudy AT kruijtflip prospectivecohortstudytoinvestigatecostminimisationoftraditionalopenopenfasttrackrecoveryandlaparoscopicfasttrackmultimodalmanagementforsurgicalpatientswithcoloncarcinomastapasstudy AT rosmancamiel prospectivecohortstudytoinvestigatecostminimisationoftraditionalopenopenfasttrackrecoveryandlaparoscopicfasttrackmultimodalmanagementforsurgicalpatientswithcoloncarcinomastapasstudy AT vanduivendijkpeter prospectivecohortstudytoinvestigatecostminimisationoftraditionalopenopenfasttrackrecoveryandlaparoscopicfasttrackmultimodalmanagementforsurgicalpatientswithcoloncarcinomastapasstudy AT dejongceeshc prospectivecohortstudytoinvestigatecostminimisationoftraditionalopenopenfasttrackrecoveryandlaparoscopicfasttrackmultimodalmanagementforsurgicalpatientswithcoloncarcinomastapasstudy AT vanlaarhovenceesjhm prospectivecohortstudytoinvestigatecostminimisationoftraditionalopenopenfasttrackrecoveryandlaparoscopicfasttrackmultimodalmanagementforsurgicalpatientswithcoloncarcinomastapasstudy |