Cargando…

Comparison of DNA extraction kits for PCR-DGGE analysis of human intestinal microbial communities from fecal specimens

BACKGROUND: The influence of diet on intestinal microflora has been investigated mainly using conventional microbiological approaches. Although these studies have advanced knowledge on human intestinal microflora, it is imperative that new methods are applied to facilitate scientific progress. Cultu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ariefdjohan, Merlin W, Savaiano, Dennis A, Nakatsu, Cindy H
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2901363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20492702
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2891-9-23
_version_ 1782183682758410240
author Ariefdjohan, Merlin W
Savaiano, Dennis A
Nakatsu, Cindy H
author_facet Ariefdjohan, Merlin W
Savaiano, Dennis A
Nakatsu, Cindy H
author_sort Ariefdjohan, Merlin W
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The influence of diet on intestinal microflora has been investigated mainly using conventional microbiological approaches. Although these studies have advanced knowledge on human intestinal microflora, it is imperative that new methods are applied to facilitate scientific progress. Culture-independent molecular fingerprinting method of Polymerase Chain Reaction and Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis (PCR-DGGE) has been used to study microbial communities in a variety of environmental samples. However, these protocols must be optimized prior to their application in order to enhance the quality and accuracy of downstream analyses. In this study, the relative efficacy of four commercial DNA extraction kits (Mobio Ultra Clean(® )Fecal DNA Isolation Kit, M; QIAamp(® )DNA Stool Mini Kit, Q; FastDNA(® )SPIN Kit, FSp; FastDNA(® )SPIN Kit for Soil, FSo) were evaluated. Further, PCR-DGGE technique was also assessed for its feasibility in detecting differences in human intestinal bacterial fingerprint profiles. METHOD: Total DNA was extracted from varying weights of human fecal specimens using four different kits, followed by PCR amplification of bacterial 16S rRNA genes, and DGGE separation of the amplicons. RESULTS: Regardless of kit, maximum DNA yield was obtained using 10 to 50 mg (wet wt) of fecal specimens and similar DGGE profiles were obtained. However, kits FSp and FSo extracted significantly larger amounts of DNA per g dry fecal specimens and produced more bands on their DGGE profiles than kits M and Q due to their use of bead-containing lysing matrix and vigorous shaking step. DGGE of 16S rRNA gene PCR products was suitable for capturing the profiles of human intestinal microbial community and enabled rapid comparative assessment of inter- and intra-subject differences. CONCLUSION: We conclude that extraction kits that incorporated bead-containing lysing matrix and vigorous shaking produced high quality DNA from human fecal specimens (10 to 50 mg, wet wt) that can be resolved as bacterial community fingerprints using PCR-DGGE technique. Subsequently, PCR-DGGE technique can be applied for studying variations in human intestinal microbial communities.
format Text
id pubmed-2901363
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29013632010-07-10 Comparison of DNA extraction kits for PCR-DGGE analysis of human intestinal microbial communities from fecal specimens Ariefdjohan, Merlin W Savaiano, Dennis A Nakatsu, Cindy H Nutr J Research BACKGROUND: The influence of diet on intestinal microflora has been investigated mainly using conventional microbiological approaches. Although these studies have advanced knowledge on human intestinal microflora, it is imperative that new methods are applied to facilitate scientific progress. Culture-independent molecular fingerprinting method of Polymerase Chain Reaction and Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis (PCR-DGGE) has been used to study microbial communities in a variety of environmental samples. However, these protocols must be optimized prior to their application in order to enhance the quality and accuracy of downstream analyses. In this study, the relative efficacy of four commercial DNA extraction kits (Mobio Ultra Clean(® )Fecal DNA Isolation Kit, M; QIAamp(® )DNA Stool Mini Kit, Q; FastDNA(® )SPIN Kit, FSp; FastDNA(® )SPIN Kit for Soil, FSo) were evaluated. Further, PCR-DGGE technique was also assessed for its feasibility in detecting differences in human intestinal bacterial fingerprint profiles. METHOD: Total DNA was extracted from varying weights of human fecal specimens using four different kits, followed by PCR amplification of bacterial 16S rRNA genes, and DGGE separation of the amplicons. RESULTS: Regardless of kit, maximum DNA yield was obtained using 10 to 50 mg (wet wt) of fecal specimens and similar DGGE profiles were obtained. However, kits FSp and FSo extracted significantly larger amounts of DNA per g dry fecal specimens and produced more bands on their DGGE profiles than kits M and Q due to their use of bead-containing lysing matrix and vigorous shaking step. DGGE of 16S rRNA gene PCR products was suitable for capturing the profiles of human intestinal microbial community and enabled rapid comparative assessment of inter- and intra-subject differences. CONCLUSION: We conclude that extraction kits that incorporated bead-containing lysing matrix and vigorous shaking produced high quality DNA from human fecal specimens (10 to 50 mg, wet wt) that can be resolved as bacterial community fingerprints using PCR-DGGE technique. Subsequently, PCR-DGGE technique can be applied for studying variations in human intestinal microbial communities. BioMed Central 2010-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC2901363/ /pubmed/20492702 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2891-9-23 Text en Copyright ©2010 Ariefdjohan et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Ariefdjohan, Merlin W
Savaiano, Dennis A
Nakatsu, Cindy H
Comparison of DNA extraction kits for PCR-DGGE analysis of human intestinal microbial communities from fecal specimens
title Comparison of DNA extraction kits for PCR-DGGE analysis of human intestinal microbial communities from fecal specimens
title_full Comparison of DNA extraction kits for PCR-DGGE analysis of human intestinal microbial communities from fecal specimens
title_fullStr Comparison of DNA extraction kits for PCR-DGGE analysis of human intestinal microbial communities from fecal specimens
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of DNA extraction kits for PCR-DGGE analysis of human intestinal microbial communities from fecal specimens
title_short Comparison of DNA extraction kits for PCR-DGGE analysis of human intestinal microbial communities from fecal specimens
title_sort comparison of dna extraction kits for pcr-dgge analysis of human intestinal microbial communities from fecal specimens
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2901363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20492702
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2891-9-23
work_keys_str_mv AT ariefdjohanmerlinw comparisonofdnaextractionkitsforpcrdggeanalysisofhumanintestinalmicrobialcommunitiesfromfecalspecimens
AT savaianodennisa comparisonofdnaextractionkitsforpcrdggeanalysisofhumanintestinalmicrobialcommunitiesfromfecalspecimens
AT nakatsucindyh comparisonofdnaextractionkitsforpcrdggeanalysisofhumanintestinalmicrobialcommunitiesfromfecalspecimens