Cargando…

A comparison of probe-level and probeset models for small-sample gene expression data

BACKGROUND: Statistical methods to tentatively identify differentially expressed genes in microarray studies typically assume larger sample sizes than are practical or even possible in some settings. RESULTS: The performance of several probe-level and probeset models was assessed graphically and num...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stevens, John R, Bell, Jason L, Aston, Kenneth I, White, Kenneth L
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2901368/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20504334
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-281
_version_ 1782183683951689728
author Stevens, John R
Bell, Jason L
Aston, Kenneth I
White, Kenneth L
author_facet Stevens, John R
Bell, Jason L
Aston, Kenneth I
White, Kenneth L
author_sort Stevens, John R
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Statistical methods to tentatively identify differentially expressed genes in microarray studies typically assume larger sample sizes than are practical or even possible in some settings. RESULTS: The performance of several probe-level and probeset models was assessed graphically and numerically using three spike-in datasets. Based on the Affymetrix GeneChip, a novel nested factorial model was developed and found to perform competitively on small-sample spike-in experiments. CONCLUSIONS: Statistical methods with test statistics related to the estimated log fold change tend to be more consistent in their performance on small-sample gene expression data. For such small-sample experiments, the nested factorial model can be a useful statistical tool. This method is implemented in freely-available R code (affyNFM), available with a tutorial document at http://www.stat.usu.edu/~jrstevens.
format Text
id pubmed-2901368
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29013682010-07-10 A comparison of probe-level and probeset models for small-sample gene expression data Stevens, John R Bell, Jason L Aston, Kenneth I White, Kenneth L BMC Bioinformatics Methodology article BACKGROUND: Statistical methods to tentatively identify differentially expressed genes in microarray studies typically assume larger sample sizes than are practical or even possible in some settings. RESULTS: The performance of several probe-level and probeset models was assessed graphically and numerically using three spike-in datasets. Based on the Affymetrix GeneChip, a novel nested factorial model was developed and found to perform competitively on small-sample spike-in experiments. CONCLUSIONS: Statistical methods with test statistics related to the estimated log fold change tend to be more consistent in their performance on small-sample gene expression data. For such small-sample experiments, the nested factorial model can be a useful statistical tool. This method is implemented in freely-available R code (affyNFM), available with a tutorial document at http://www.stat.usu.edu/~jrstevens. BioMed Central 2010-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC2901368/ /pubmed/20504334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-281 Text en Copyright ©2010 Stevens et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methodology article
Stevens, John R
Bell, Jason L
Aston, Kenneth I
White, Kenneth L
A comparison of probe-level and probeset models for small-sample gene expression data
title A comparison of probe-level and probeset models for small-sample gene expression data
title_full A comparison of probe-level and probeset models for small-sample gene expression data
title_fullStr A comparison of probe-level and probeset models for small-sample gene expression data
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of probe-level and probeset models for small-sample gene expression data
title_short A comparison of probe-level and probeset models for small-sample gene expression data
title_sort comparison of probe-level and probeset models for small-sample gene expression data
topic Methodology article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2901368/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20504334
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-281
work_keys_str_mv AT stevensjohnr acomparisonofprobelevelandprobesetmodelsforsmallsamplegeneexpressiondata
AT belljasonl acomparisonofprobelevelandprobesetmodelsforsmallsamplegeneexpressiondata
AT astonkennethi acomparisonofprobelevelandprobesetmodelsforsmallsamplegeneexpressiondata
AT whitekennethl acomparisonofprobelevelandprobesetmodelsforsmallsamplegeneexpressiondata
AT stevensjohnr comparisonofprobelevelandprobesetmodelsforsmallsamplegeneexpressiondata
AT belljasonl comparisonofprobelevelandprobesetmodelsforsmallsamplegeneexpressiondata
AT astonkennethi comparisonofprobelevelandprobesetmodelsforsmallsamplegeneexpressiondata
AT whitekennethl comparisonofprobelevelandprobesetmodelsforsmallsamplegeneexpressiondata