Cargando…
A comparison of probe-level and probeset models for small-sample gene expression data
BACKGROUND: Statistical methods to tentatively identify differentially expressed genes in microarray studies typically assume larger sample sizes than are practical or even possible in some settings. RESULTS: The performance of several probe-level and probeset models was assessed graphically and num...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2901368/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20504334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-281 |
_version_ | 1782183683951689728 |
---|---|
author | Stevens, John R Bell, Jason L Aston, Kenneth I White, Kenneth L |
author_facet | Stevens, John R Bell, Jason L Aston, Kenneth I White, Kenneth L |
author_sort | Stevens, John R |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Statistical methods to tentatively identify differentially expressed genes in microarray studies typically assume larger sample sizes than are practical or even possible in some settings. RESULTS: The performance of several probe-level and probeset models was assessed graphically and numerically using three spike-in datasets. Based on the Affymetrix GeneChip, a novel nested factorial model was developed and found to perform competitively on small-sample spike-in experiments. CONCLUSIONS: Statistical methods with test statistics related to the estimated log fold change tend to be more consistent in their performance on small-sample gene expression data. For such small-sample experiments, the nested factorial model can be a useful statistical tool. This method is implemented in freely-available R code (affyNFM), available with a tutorial document at http://www.stat.usu.edu/~jrstevens. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2901368 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29013682010-07-10 A comparison of probe-level and probeset models for small-sample gene expression data Stevens, John R Bell, Jason L Aston, Kenneth I White, Kenneth L BMC Bioinformatics Methodology article BACKGROUND: Statistical methods to tentatively identify differentially expressed genes in microarray studies typically assume larger sample sizes than are practical or even possible in some settings. RESULTS: The performance of several probe-level and probeset models was assessed graphically and numerically using three spike-in datasets. Based on the Affymetrix GeneChip, a novel nested factorial model was developed and found to perform competitively on small-sample spike-in experiments. CONCLUSIONS: Statistical methods with test statistics related to the estimated log fold change tend to be more consistent in their performance on small-sample gene expression data. For such small-sample experiments, the nested factorial model can be a useful statistical tool. This method is implemented in freely-available R code (affyNFM), available with a tutorial document at http://www.stat.usu.edu/~jrstevens. BioMed Central 2010-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC2901368/ /pubmed/20504334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-281 Text en Copyright ©2010 Stevens et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Methodology article Stevens, John R Bell, Jason L Aston, Kenneth I White, Kenneth L A comparison of probe-level and probeset models for small-sample gene expression data |
title | A comparison of probe-level and probeset models for small-sample gene expression data |
title_full | A comparison of probe-level and probeset models for small-sample gene expression data |
title_fullStr | A comparison of probe-level and probeset models for small-sample gene expression data |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of probe-level and probeset models for small-sample gene expression data |
title_short | A comparison of probe-level and probeset models for small-sample gene expression data |
title_sort | comparison of probe-level and probeset models for small-sample gene expression data |
topic | Methodology article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2901368/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20504334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-281 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stevensjohnr acomparisonofprobelevelandprobesetmodelsforsmallsamplegeneexpressiondata AT belljasonl acomparisonofprobelevelandprobesetmodelsforsmallsamplegeneexpressiondata AT astonkennethi acomparisonofprobelevelandprobesetmodelsforsmallsamplegeneexpressiondata AT whitekennethl acomparisonofprobelevelandprobesetmodelsforsmallsamplegeneexpressiondata AT stevensjohnr comparisonofprobelevelandprobesetmodelsforsmallsamplegeneexpressiondata AT belljasonl comparisonofprobelevelandprobesetmodelsforsmallsamplegeneexpressiondata AT astonkennethi comparisonofprobelevelandprobesetmodelsforsmallsamplegeneexpressiondata AT whitekennethl comparisonofprobelevelandprobesetmodelsforsmallsamplegeneexpressiondata |