Cargando…
Variable Classifications of Glycemic Index Determined by Glucose Meters
The study evaluated and compared the differences of glucose responses, incremental area under curve (IAUC), glycemic index (GI) and the classification of GI values between measured by biochemical analyzer (Fuji automatic biochemistry analyzer (FAA)) and three glucose meters: Accue Chek Advantage (AG...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
the Society for Free Radical Research Japan
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2901763/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20664730 http://dx.doi.org/10.3164/jcbn.10-08 |
_version_ | 1782183708788260864 |
---|---|
author | Lin, Meng-Hsueh Amanda Wu, Ming-Chang Lin, Jenshinn |
author_facet | Lin, Meng-Hsueh Amanda Wu, Ming-Chang Lin, Jenshinn |
author_sort | Lin, Meng-Hsueh Amanda |
collection | PubMed |
description | The study evaluated and compared the differences of glucose responses, incremental area under curve (IAUC), glycemic index (GI) and the classification of GI values between measured by biochemical analyzer (Fuji automatic biochemistry analyzer (FAA)) and three glucose meters: Accue Chek Advantage (AGM), BREEZE 2 (BGM), and Optimum Xceed (OGM). Ten healthy subjects were recruited for the study. The results showed OGM yield highest postprandial glucose responses of 119.6 ± 1.5, followed by FAA, 118.4 ± 1.2, BGM, 117.4 ± 1.4 and AGM, 112.6 ± 1.3 mg/dl respectively. FAA reached highest mean IAUC of 4156 ± 208 mg × min/dl, followed by OGM (3835 ± 270 mg × min/dl), BGM (3730 ± 241 mg × min/dl) and AGM (3394 ± 253 mg × min/dl). Among four methods, OGM produced highest mean GI value than FAA (87 ± 5) than FAA, followed by BGM and AGM (77 ± 1, 68 ± 4 and 63 ± 5, p<0.05). The results suggested that the AGM, BGM and OGM are more variable methods to determine IAUC, GI and rank GI value of food than FAA. The present result does not necessarily apply to other glucose meters. The performance of glucose meter to determine GI value of food should be evaluated and calibrated before use. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2901763 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | the Society for Free Radical Research Japan |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29017632010-07-27 Variable Classifications of Glycemic Index Determined by Glucose Meters Lin, Meng-Hsueh Amanda Wu, Ming-Chang Lin, Jenshinn J Clin Biochem Nutr Original Article The study evaluated and compared the differences of glucose responses, incremental area under curve (IAUC), glycemic index (GI) and the classification of GI values between measured by biochemical analyzer (Fuji automatic biochemistry analyzer (FAA)) and three glucose meters: Accue Chek Advantage (AGM), BREEZE 2 (BGM), and Optimum Xceed (OGM). Ten healthy subjects were recruited for the study. The results showed OGM yield highest postprandial glucose responses of 119.6 ± 1.5, followed by FAA, 118.4 ± 1.2, BGM, 117.4 ± 1.4 and AGM, 112.6 ± 1.3 mg/dl respectively. FAA reached highest mean IAUC of 4156 ± 208 mg × min/dl, followed by OGM (3835 ± 270 mg × min/dl), BGM (3730 ± 241 mg × min/dl) and AGM (3394 ± 253 mg × min/dl). Among four methods, OGM produced highest mean GI value than FAA (87 ± 5) than FAA, followed by BGM and AGM (77 ± 1, 68 ± 4 and 63 ± 5, p<0.05). The results suggested that the AGM, BGM and OGM are more variable methods to determine IAUC, GI and rank GI value of food than FAA. The present result does not necessarily apply to other glucose meters. The performance of glucose meter to determine GI value of food should be evaluated and calibrated before use. the Society for Free Radical Research Japan 2010-07 2010-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC2901763/ /pubmed/20664730 http://dx.doi.org/10.3164/jcbn.10-08 Text en Copyright © 2010 JCBN This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Lin, Meng-Hsueh Amanda Wu, Ming-Chang Lin, Jenshinn Variable Classifications of Glycemic Index Determined by Glucose Meters |
title | Variable Classifications of Glycemic Index Determined by Glucose Meters |
title_full | Variable Classifications of Glycemic Index Determined by Glucose Meters |
title_fullStr | Variable Classifications of Glycemic Index Determined by Glucose Meters |
title_full_unstemmed | Variable Classifications of Glycemic Index Determined by Glucose Meters |
title_short | Variable Classifications of Glycemic Index Determined by Glucose Meters |
title_sort | variable classifications of glycemic index determined by glucose meters |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2901763/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20664730 http://dx.doi.org/10.3164/jcbn.10-08 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT linmenghsuehamanda variableclassificationsofglycemicindexdeterminedbyglucosemeters AT wumingchang variableclassificationsofglycemicindexdeterminedbyglucosemeters AT linjenshinn variableclassificationsofglycemicindexdeterminedbyglucosemeters |