Cargando…

Variable Classifications of Glycemic Index Determined by Glucose Meters

The study evaluated and compared the differences of glucose responses, incremental area under curve (IAUC), glycemic index (GI) and the classification of GI values between measured by biochemical analyzer (Fuji automatic biochemistry analyzer (FAA)) and three glucose meters: Accue Chek Advantage (AG...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Meng-Hsueh Amanda, Wu, Ming-Chang, Lin, Jenshinn
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: the Society for Free Radical Research Japan 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2901763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20664730
http://dx.doi.org/10.3164/jcbn.10-08
_version_ 1782183708788260864
author Lin, Meng-Hsueh Amanda
Wu, Ming-Chang
Lin, Jenshinn
author_facet Lin, Meng-Hsueh Amanda
Wu, Ming-Chang
Lin, Jenshinn
author_sort Lin, Meng-Hsueh Amanda
collection PubMed
description The study evaluated and compared the differences of glucose responses, incremental area under curve (IAUC), glycemic index (GI) and the classification of GI values between measured by biochemical analyzer (Fuji automatic biochemistry analyzer (FAA)) and three glucose meters: Accue Chek Advantage (AGM), BREEZE 2 (BGM), and Optimum Xceed (OGM). Ten healthy subjects were recruited for the study. The results showed OGM yield highest postprandial glucose responses of 119.6 ± 1.5, followed by FAA, 118.4 ± 1.2, BGM, 117.4 ± 1.4 and AGM, 112.6 ± 1.3 mg/dl respectively. FAA reached highest mean IAUC of 4156 ± 208 mg × min/dl, followed by OGM (3835 ± 270 mg × min/dl), BGM (3730 ± 241 mg × min/dl) and AGM (3394 ± 253 mg × min/dl). Among four methods, OGM produced highest mean GI value than FAA (87 ± 5) than FAA, followed by BGM and AGM (77 ± 1, 68 ± 4 and 63 ± 5, p<0.05). The results suggested that the AGM, BGM and OGM are more variable methods to determine IAUC, GI and rank GI value of food than FAA. The present result does not necessarily apply to other glucose meters. The performance of glucose meter to determine GI value of food should be evaluated and calibrated before use.
format Text
id pubmed-2901763
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher the Society for Free Radical Research Japan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29017632010-07-27 Variable Classifications of Glycemic Index Determined by Glucose Meters Lin, Meng-Hsueh Amanda Wu, Ming-Chang Lin, Jenshinn J Clin Biochem Nutr Original Article The study evaluated and compared the differences of glucose responses, incremental area under curve (IAUC), glycemic index (GI) and the classification of GI values between measured by biochemical analyzer (Fuji automatic biochemistry analyzer (FAA)) and three glucose meters: Accue Chek Advantage (AGM), BREEZE 2 (BGM), and Optimum Xceed (OGM). Ten healthy subjects were recruited for the study. The results showed OGM yield highest postprandial glucose responses of 119.6 ± 1.5, followed by FAA, 118.4 ± 1.2, BGM, 117.4 ± 1.4 and AGM, 112.6 ± 1.3 mg/dl respectively. FAA reached highest mean IAUC of 4156 ± 208 mg × min/dl, followed by OGM (3835 ± 270 mg × min/dl), BGM (3730 ± 241 mg × min/dl) and AGM (3394 ± 253 mg × min/dl). Among four methods, OGM produced highest mean GI value than FAA (87 ± 5) than FAA, followed by BGM and AGM (77 ± 1, 68 ± 4 and 63 ± 5, p<0.05). The results suggested that the AGM, BGM and OGM are more variable methods to determine IAUC, GI and rank GI value of food than FAA. The present result does not necessarily apply to other glucose meters. The performance of glucose meter to determine GI value of food should be evaluated and calibrated before use. the Society for Free Radical Research Japan 2010-07 2010-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC2901763/ /pubmed/20664730 http://dx.doi.org/10.3164/jcbn.10-08 Text en Copyright © 2010 JCBN This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lin, Meng-Hsueh Amanda
Wu, Ming-Chang
Lin, Jenshinn
Variable Classifications of Glycemic Index Determined by Glucose Meters
title Variable Classifications of Glycemic Index Determined by Glucose Meters
title_full Variable Classifications of Glycemic Index Determined by Glucose Meters
title_fullStr Variable Classifications of Glycemic Index Determined by Glucose Meters
title_full_unstemmed Variable Classifications of Glycemic Index Determined by Glucose Meters
title_short Variable Classifications of Glycemic Index Determined by Glucose Meters
title_sort variable classifications of glycemic index determined by glucose meters
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2901763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20664730
http://dx.doi.org/10.3164/jcbn.10-08
work_keys_str_mv AT linmenghsuehamanda variableclassificationsofglycemicindexdeterminedbyglucosemeters
AT wumingchang variableclassificationsofglycemicindexdeterminedbyglucosemeters
AT linjenshinn variableclassificationsofglycemicindexdeterminedbyglucosemeters