Cargando…

Outcome measures in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): strengths and limitations

Current methods for assessing clinical outcomes in COPD mainly rely on physiological tests combined with the use of questionnaires. The present review considers commonly used outcome measures such as lung function, health status, exercise capacity and physical activity, dyspnoea, exacerbations, the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Glaab, Thomas, Vogelmeier, Claus, Buhl, Roland
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2902430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20565728
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-11-79
_version_ 1782183757978009600
author Glaab, Thomas
Vogelmeier, Claus
Buhl, Roland
author_facet Glaab, Thomas
Vogelmeier, Claus
Buhl, Roland
author_sort Glaab, Thomas
collection PubMed
description Current methods for assessing clinical outcomes in COPD mainly rely on physiological tests combined with the use of questionnaires. The present review considers commonly used outcome measures such as lung function, health status, exercise capacity and physical activity, dyspnoea, exacerbations, the multi-dimensional BODE score, and mortality. Based on current published data, we provide a concise overview of the principles, strengths and weaknesses, and discuss open questions related to each methodology. Reviewed is the current set of markers for measuring clinically relevant outcomes with particular emphasis on their limitations and opportunities that should be recognized when assessing and interpreting their use in clinical trials of COPD.
format Text
id pubmed-2902430
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29024302010-07-13 Outcome measures in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): strengths and limitations Glaab, Thomas Vogelmeier, Claus Buhl, Roland Respir Res Review Current methods for assessing clinical outcomes in COPD mainly rely on physiological tests combined with the use of questionnaires. The present review considers commonly used outcome measures such as lung function, health status, exercise capacity and physical activity, dyspnoea, exacerbations, the multi-dimensional BODE score, and mortality. Based on current published data, we provide a concise overview of the principles, strengths and weaknesses, and discuss open questions related to each methodology. Reviewed is the current set of markers for measuring clinically relevant outcomes with particular emphasis on their limitations and opportunities that should be recognized when assessing and interpreting their use in clinical trials of COPD. BioMed Central 2010 2010-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC2902430/ /pubmed/20565728 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-11-79 Text en Copyright ©2010 Glaab et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Glaab, Thomas
Vogelmeier, Claus
Buhl, Roland
Outcome measures in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): strengths and limitations
title Outcome measures in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): strengths and limitations
title_full Outcome measures in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): strengths and limitations
title_fullStr Outcome measures in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): strengths and limitations
title_full_unstemmed Outcome measures in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): strengths and limitations
title_short Outcome measures in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): strengths and limitations
title_sort outcome measures in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (copd): strengths and limitations
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2902430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20565728
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-11-79
work_keys_str_mv AT glaabthomas outcomemeasuresinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasecopdstrengthsandlimitations
AT vogelmeierclaus outcomemeasuresinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasecopdstrengthsandlimitations
AT buhlroland outcomemeasuresinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasecopdstrengthsandlimitations