Cargando…
Can egg donor selection be improved? - a pilot study
BACKGROUND: Accurate assessments of ovarian reserve (OR) in egg donor candidates are crucial for maximal donor selection. This study assesses whether recently reported new methods of OR assessment by age-specific (as-), rather than non-as (nas-) hormones, follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and anti-...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2902488/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20576154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-8-76 |
_version_ | 1782183770913243136 |
---|---|
author | Gleicher, Norbert Weghofer, Andrea Barad, David H |
author_facet | Gleicher, Norbert Weghofer, Andrea Barad, David H |
author_sort | Gleicher, Norbert |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Accurate assessments of ovarian reserve (OR) in egg donor candidates are crucial for maximal donor selection. This study assesses whether recently reported new methods of OR assessment by age-specific (as-), rather than non-as (nas-) hormones, follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), and triple nucleotide (CGG) repeats on the FMR1 (fragile X) gene have the potential of improving egg donor selection. METHODS: Seventy-three consecutive egg donor candidates (candidates), amongst those 21 who reached egg retrieval (donors), were prospectively investigated for as-FSH, as-AMH and number of CGG repeats. Abnormal findings were assessed in candidates and donors and oocyte yields in the latter were statistically associated with abnormal FSH and AMH (>/< 95% CI of as-levels) and with normal/abnormal numbers of CGG repeats (normal range 26-32). RESULTS: Amongst candidates mean as-AMH was 3.8 +/- 2.8 ng/mL (37.0% normal, 3.0 +/- 0.7 ng/mL; 26.6% low, 1.5 +/- 0.5 ng/mL; and 37.0% high, 5.8 +/- 2.2 ng/mL). AMH among donors was 4.2 +/- 1.7 ng/mL (33.3% normal, 14.3% low, and 52.4% high), yielding 17.8 +/- 7.2 oocytes, 42.9% in normal range (10-15), 9.5% in low (less than or equal to 9) and 47.6.% in high range (16-32). Candidates in 41.9% and donors in 38.1% demonstrated normal CGG counts; the remained were mostly heterozygous abnormal. DISCUSSION: Prospective assessment of even carefully prescreened candidates and donors still demonstrates shortcomings on both ends of the OR spectrum. Utilization of ovarian reserve testing methods, like as-hormones and CGG repeats on the FMR1 gene have potential of improving candidate selections. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2902488 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29024882010-07-13 Can egg donor selection be improved? - a pilot study Gleicher, Norbert Weghofer, Andrea Barad, David H Reprod Biol Endocrinol Methodology BACKGROUND: Accurate assessments of ovarian reserve (OR) in egg donor candidates are crucial for maximal donor selection. This study assesses whether recently reported new methods of OR assessment by age-specific (as-), rather than non-as (nas-) hormones, follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), and triple nucleotide (CGG) repeats on the FMR1 (fragile X) gene have the potential of improving egg donor selection. METHODS: Seventy-three consecutive egg donor candidates (candidates), amongst those 21 who reached egg retrieval (donors), were prospectively investigated for as-FSH, as-AMH and number of CGG repeats. Abnormal findings were assessed in candidates and donors and oocyte yields in the latter were statistically associated with abnormal FSH and AMH (>/< 95% CI of as-levels) and with normal/abnormal numbers of CGG repeats (normal range 26-32). RESULTS: Amongst candidates mean as-AMH was 3.8 +/- 2.8 ng/mL (37.0% normal, 3.0 +/- 0.7 ng/mL; 26.6% low, 1.5 +/- 0.5 ng/mL; and 37.0% high, 5.8 +/- 2.2 ng/mL). AMH among donors was 4.2 +/- 1.7 ng/mL (33.3% normal, 14.3% low, and 52.4% high), yielding 17.8 +/- 7.2 oocytes, 42.9% in normal range (10-15), 9.5% in low (less than or equal to 9) and 47.6.% in high range (16-32). Candidates in 41.9% and donors in 38.1% demonstrated normal CGG counts; the remained were mostly heterozygous abnormal. DISCUSSION: Prospective assessment of even carefully prescreened candidates and donors still demonstrates shortcomings on both ends of the OR spectrum. Utilization of ovarian reserve testing methods, like as-hormones and CGG repeats on the FMR1 gene have potential of improving candidate selections. BioMed Central 2010-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC2902488/ /pubmed/20576154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-8-76 Text en Copyright ©2010 Gleicher et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Gleicher, Norbert Weghofer, Andrea Barad, David H Can egg donor selection be improved? - a pilot study |
title | Can egg donor selection be improved? - a pilot study |
title_full | Can egg donor selection be improved? - a pilot study |
title_fullStr | Can egg donor selection be improved? - a pilot study |
title_full_unstemmed | Can egg donor selection be improved? - a pilot study |
title_short | Can egg donor selection be improved? - a pilot study |
title_sort | can egg donor selection be improved? - a pilot study |
topic | Methodology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2902488/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20576154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-8-76 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gleichernorbert caneggdonorselectionbeimprovedapilotstudy AT weghoferandrea caneggdonorselectionbeimprovedapilotstudy AT baraddavidh caneggdonorselectionbeimprovedapilotstudy |