Cargando…

Can egg donor selection be improved? - a pilot study

BACKGROUND: Accurate assessments of ovarian reserve (OR) in egg donor candidates are crucial for maximal donor selection. This study assesses whether recently reported new methods of OR assessment by age-specific (as-), rather than non-as (nas-) hormones, follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and anti-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gleicher, Norbert, Weghofer, Andrea, Barad, David H
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2902488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20576154
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-8-76
_version_ 1782183770913243136
author Gleicher, Norbert
Weghofer, Andrea
Barad, David H
author_facet Gleicher, Norbert
Weghofer, Andrea
Barad, David H
author_sort Gleicher, Norbert
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Accurate assessments of ovarian reserve (OR) in egg donor candidates are crucial for maximal donor selection. This study assesses whether recently reported new methods of OR assessment by age-specific (as-), rather than non-as (nas-) hormones, follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), and triple nucleotide (CGG) repeats on the FMR1 (fragile X) gene have the potential of improving egg donor selection. METHODS: Seventy-three consecutive egg donor candidates (candidates), amongst those 21 who reached egg retrieval (donors), were prospectively investigated for as-FSH, as-AMH and number of CGG repeats. Abnormal findings were assessed in candidates and donors and oocyte yields in the latter were statistically associated with abnormal FSH and AMH (>/< 95% CI of as-levels) and with normal/abnormal numbers of CGG repeats (normal range 26-32). RESULTS: Amongst candidates mean as-AMH was 3.8 +/- 2.8 ng/mL (37.0% normal, 3.0 +/- 0.7 ng/mL; 26.6% low, 1.5 +/- 0.5 ng/mL; and 37.0% high, 5.8 +/- 2.2 ng/mL). AMH among donors was 4.2 +/- 1.7 ng/mL (33.3% normal, 14.3% low, and 52.4% high), yielding 17.8 +/- 7.2 oocytes, 42.9% in normal range (10-15), 9.5% in low (less than or equal to 9) and 47.6.% in high range (16-32). Candidates in 41.9% and donors in 38.1% demonstrated normal CGG counts; the remained were mostly heterozygous abnormal. DISCUSSION: Prospective assessment of even carefully prescreened candidates and donors still demonstrates shortcomings on both ends of the OR spectrum. Utilization of ovarian reserve testing methods, like as-hormones and CGG repeats on the FMR1 gene have potential of improving candidate selections.
format Text
id pubmed-2902488
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29024882010-07-13 Can egg donor selection be improved? - a pilot study Gleicher, Norbert Weghofer, Andrea Barad, David H Reprod Biol Endocrinol Methodology BACKGROUND: Accurate assessments of ovarian reserve (OR) in egg donor candidates are crucial for maximal donor selection. This study assesses whether recently reported new methods of OR assessment by age-specific (as-), rather than non-as (nas-) hormones, follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), and triple nucleotide (CGG) repeats on the FMR1 (fragile X) gene have the potential of improving egg donor selection. METHODS: Seventy-three consecutive egg donor candidates (candidates), amongst those 21 who reached egg retrieval (donors), were prospectively investigated for as-FSH, as-AMH and number of CGG repeats. Abnormal findings were assessed in candidates and donors and oocyte yields in the latter were statistically associated with abnormal FSH and AMH (>/< 95% CI of as-levels) and with normal/abnormal numbers of CGG repeats (normal range 26-32). RESULTS: Amongst candidates mean as-AMH was 3.8 +/- 2.8 ng/mL (37.0% normal, 3.0 +/- 0.7 ng/mL; 26.6% low, 1.5 +/- 0.5 ng/mL; and 37.0% high, 5.8 +/- 2.2 ng/mL). AMH among donors was 4.2 +/- 1.7 ng/mL (33.3% normal, 14.3% low, and 52.4% high), yielding 17.8 +/- 7.2 oocytes, 42.9% in normal range (10-15), 9.5% in low (less than or equal to 9) and 47.6.% in high range (16-32). Candidates in 41.9% and donors in 38.1% demonstrated normal CGG counts; the remained were mostly heterozygous abnormal. DISCUSSION: Prospective assessment of even carefully prescreened candidates and donors still demonstrates shortcomings on both ends of the OR spectrum. Utilization of ovarian reserve testing methods, like as-hormones and CGG repeats on the FMR1 gene have potential of improving candidate selections. BioMed Central 2010-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC2902488/ /pubmed/20576154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-8-76 Text en Copyright ©2010 Gleicher et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methodology
Gleicher, Norbert
Weghofer, Andrea
Barad, David H
Can egg donor selection be improved? - a pilot study
title Can egg donor selection be improved? - a pilot study
title_full Can egg donor selection be improved? - a pilot study
title_fullStr Can egg donor selection be improved? - a pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Can egg donor selection be improved? - a pilot study
title_short Can egg donor selection be improved? - a pilot study
title_sort can egg donor selection be improved? - a pilot study
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2902488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20576154
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-8-76
work_keys_str_mv AT gleichernorbert caneggdonorselectionbeimprovedapilotstudy
AT weghoferandrea caneggdonorselectionbeimprovedapilotstudy
AT baraddavidh caneggdonorselectionbeimprovedapilotstudy