Cargando…
Locomotor Adaptation versus Perceptual Adaptation when Stepping Over an Obstacle with a Height Illusion
BACKGROUND: During locomotion, vision is used to perceive environmental obstacles that could potentially threaten stability; locomotor action is then modified to avoid these obstacles. Various factors such as lighting and texture can make these environmental obstacles appear larger or smaller than t...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2902523/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20634962 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011544 |
_version_ | 1782183779361619968 |
---|---|
author | Rhea, Christopher K. Rietdyk, Shirley Haddad, Jeffery M. |
author_facet | Rhea, Christopher K. Rietdyk, Shirley Haddad, Jeffery M. |
author_sort | Rhea, Christopher K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: During locomotion, vision is used to perceive environmental obstacles that could potentially threaten stability; locomotor action is then modified to avoid these obstacles. Various factors such as lighting and texture can make these environmental obstacles appear larger or smaller than their actual size. It is unclear if gait is adapted based on the actual or perceived height of these environmental obstacles. The purposes of this study were to determine if visually guided action is scaled to visual perception, and to determine if task experience influenced how action is scaled to perception. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Participants judged the height of two obstacles before and after stepping over each of them 50 times. An illusion made obstacle one appear larger than obstacle two, even though they were identical in size. The influence of task experience was examined by comparing the perception-action relationship during the first five obstacle crossings (1–5) with the last five obstacle crossings (46–50). In the first set of trials, obstacle one was perceived to be 2.0 cm larger than obstacle two and subjects stepped 2.7 cm higher over obstacle one. After walking over the obstacle 50 times, the toe elevation was not different between obstacles, but obstacle one was still perceived as 2.4 cm larger. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: There was evidence of locomotor adaptation, but no evidence of perceptual adaptation with experience. These findings add to research that demonstrates that while the motor system can be influenced by perception, it can also operate independent of perception. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2902523 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29025232010-07-15 Locomotor Adaptation versus Perceptual Adaptation when Stepping Over an Obstacle with a Height Illusion Rhea, Christopher K. Rietdyk, Shirley Haddad, Jeffery M. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: During locomotion, vision is used to perceive environmental obstacles that could potentially threaten stability; locomotor action is then modified to avoid these obstacles. Various factors such as lighting and texture can make these environmental obstacles appear larger or smaller than their actual size. It is unclear if gait is adapted based on the actual or perceived height of these environmental obstacles. The purposes of this study were to determine if visually guided action is scaled to visual perception, and to determine if task experience influenced how action is scaled to perception. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Participants judged the height of two obstacles before and after stepping over each of them 50 times. An illusion made obstacle one appear larger than obstacle two, even though they were identical in size. The influence of task experience was examined by comparing the perception-action relationship during the first five obstacle crossings (1–5) with the last five obstacle crossings (46–50). In the first set of trials, obstacle one was perceived to be 2.0 cm larger than obstacle two and subjects stepped 2.7 cm higher over obstacle one. After walking over the obstacle 50 times, the toe elevation was not different between obstacles, but obstacle one was still perceived as 2.4 cm larger. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: There was evidence of locomotor adaptation, but no evidence of perceptual adaptation with experience. These findings add to research that demonstrates that while the motor system can be influenced by perception, it can also operate independent of perception. Public Library of Science 2010-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC2902523/ /pubmed/20634962 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011544 Text en Rhea et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Rhea, Christopher K. Rietdyk, Shirley Haddad, Jeffery M. Locomotor Adaptation versus Perceptual Adaptation when Stepping Over an Obstacle with a Height Illusion |
title | Locomotor Adaptation versus Perceptual Adaptation when Stepping Over an Obstacle with a Height Illusion |
title_full | Locomotor Adaptation versus Perceptual Adaptation when Stepping Over an Obstacle with a Height Illusion |
title_fullStr | Locomotor Adaptation versus Perceptual Adaptation when Stepping Over an Obstacle with a Height Illusion |
title_full_unstemmed | Locomotor Adaptation versus Perceptual Adaptation when Stepping Over an Obstacle with a Height Illusion |
title_short | Locomotor Adaptation versus Perceptual Adaptation when Stepping Over an Obstacle with a Height Illusion |
title_sort | locomotor adaptation versus perceptual adaptation when stepping over an obstacle with a height illusion |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2902523/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20634962 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011544 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rheachristopherk locomotoradaptationversusperceptualadaptationwhensteppingoveranobstaclewithaheightillusion AT rietdykshirley locomotoradaptationversusperceptualadaptationwhensteppingoveranobstaclewithaheightillusion AT haddadjefferym locomotoradaptationversusperceptualadaptationwhensteppingoveranobstaclewithaheightillusion |