Cargando…

Time to Update and Quantitative Changes in the Results of Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Reviews

BACKGROUND: The recommended interval between updates for systematic reviews included in The Cochrane Library is 2 years. However, it is unclear whether this interval is always appropriate. Whereas excessive updating wastes time and resources, insufficient updating allows out-of-date or incomplete ev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jaidee, Wanlop, Moher, David, Laopaiboon, Malinee
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2903478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20644625
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011553
_version_ 1782183799750131712
author Jaidee, Wanlop
Moher, David
Laopaiboon, Malinee
author_facet Jaidee, Wanlop
Moher, David
Laopaiboon, Malinee
author_sort Jaidee, Wanlop
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The recommended interval between updates for systematic reviews included in The Cochrane Library is 2 years. However, it is unclear whether this interval is always appropriate. Whereas excessive updating wastes time and resources, insufficient updating allows out-of-date or incomplete evidence to guide clinical decision-making. We set out to determine, for Cochrane pregnancy and childbirth reviews, the frequency of updates, factors associated with updating, and whether updating frequency was appropriate. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Cochrane pregnancy and childbirth reviews published in Issue 3, 2007 of the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were retrieved, and data were collected from their original and updated versions. Quantitative changes were determined for one of the primary outcomes (mortality, or the outcome of greatest clinical significance). Potential factors associated with time to update were assessed using the Cox proportional hazard model. Among the 101 reviews in our final sample, the median time before the first update was 3.3 years (95% CI 2.7–3.8). Only 32.7% had been updated within the recommended interval of 2 years. In 75.3% (76/101), a median of 3 new trials with a median of 576 additional participants were included in the updated versions. There were quantitative changes in 71% of the reviews that included new trials (54/76): the median change in effect size was 18.2%, and the median change in 95% CI width was 30.8%. Statistical significance changed in 18.5% (10/54) of these reviews, but conclusions were revised in only 3.7% (2/54). A shorter time to update was associated with the same original review team at updating. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Most reviews were updated less frequently than recommended by Cochrane policy, but few updates had revised conclusions. Prescribed time to update should be reconsidered to support improved decision-making while making efficient use of limited resources.
format Text
id pubmed-2903478
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29034782010-07-19 Time to Update and Quantitative Changes in the Results of Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Reviews Jaidee, Wanlop Moher, David Laopaiboon, Malinee PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The recommended interval between updates for systematic reviews included in The Cochrane Library is 2 years. However, it is unclear whether this interval is always appropriate. Whereas excessive updating wastes time and resources, insufficient updating allows out-of-date or incomplete evidence to guide clinical decision-making. We set out to determine, for Cochrane pregnancy and childbirth reviews, the frequency of updates, factors associated with updating, and whether updating frequency was appropriate. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Cochrane pregnancy and childbirth reviews published in Issue 3, 2007 of the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were retrieved, and data were collected from their original and updated versions. Quantitative changes were determined for one of the primary outcomes (mortality, or the outcome of greatest clinical significance). Potential factors associated with time to update were assessed using the Cox proportional hazard model. Among the 101 reviews in our final sample, the median time before the first update was 3.3 years (95% CI 2.7–3.8). Only 32.7% had been updated within the recommended interval of 2 years. In 75.3% (76/101), a median of 3 new trials with a median of 576 additional participants were included in the updated versions. There were quantitative changes in 71% of the reviews that included new trials (54/76): the median change in effect size was 18.2%, and the median change in 95% CI width was 30.8%. Statistical significance changed in 18.5% (10/54) of these reviews, but conclusions were revised in only 3.7% (2/54). A shorter time to update was associated with the same original review team at updating. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Most reviews were updated less frequently than recommended by Cochrane policy, but few updates had revised conclusions. Prescribed time to update should be reconsidered to support improved decision-making while making efficient use of limited resources. Public Library of Science 2010-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC2903478/ /pubmed/20644625 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011553 Text en Jaidee et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jaidee, Wanlop
Moher, David
Laopaiboon, Malinee
Time to Update and Quantitative Changes in the Results of Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Reviews
title Time to Update and Quantitative Changes in the Results of Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Reviews
title_full Time to Update and Quantitative Changes in the Results of Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Reviews
title_fullStr Time to Update and Quantitative Changes in the Results of Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Reviews
title_full_unstemmed Time to Update and Quantitative Changes in the Results of Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Reviews
title_short Time to Update and Quantitative Changes in the Results of Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Reviews
title_sort time to update and quantitative changes in the results of cochrane pregnancy and childbirth reviews
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2903478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20644625
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011553
work_keys_str_mv AT jaideewanlop timetoupdateandquantitativechangesintheresultsofcochranepregnancyandchildbirthreviews
AT moherdavid timetoupdateandquantitativechangesintheresultsofcochranepregnancyandchildbirthreviews
AT laopaiboonmalinee timetoupdateandquantitativechangesintheresultsofcochranepregnancyandchildbirthreviews