Cargando…
Responses of mirror neurons in area F5 to hand and tool grasping observation
Mirror neurons are a distinct class of neurons that discharge both during the execution of a motor act and during observation of the same or similar motor act performed by another individual. However, the extent to which mirror neurons coding a motor act with a specific goal (e.g., grasping) might a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2903687/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20577726 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2329-9 |
_version_ | 1782183833264717824 |
---|---|
author | Rochat, Magali J. Caruana, Fausto Jezzini, Ahmad Escola, Ludovic Intskirveli, Irakli Grammont, Franck Gallese, Vittorio Rizzolatti, Giacomo Umiltà, Maria Alessandra |
author_facet | Rochat, Magali J. Caruana, Fausto Jezzini, Ahmad Escola, Ludovic Intskirveli, Irakli Grammont, Franck Gallese, Vittorio Rizzolatti, Giacomo Umiltà, Maria Alessandra |
author_sort | Rochat, Magali J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Mirror neurons are a distinct class of neurons that discharge both during the execution of a motor act and during observation of the same or similar motor act performed by another individual. However, the extent to which mirror neurons coding a motor act with a specific goal (e.g., grasping) might also respond to the observation of a motor act having the same goal, but achieved with artificial effectors, is not yet established. In the present study, we addressed this issue by recording mirror neurons from the ventral premotor cortex (area F5) of two monkeys trained to grasp objects with pliers. Neuron activity was recorded during the observation and execution of grasping performed with the hand, with pliers and during observation of an experimenter spearing food with a stick. The results showed that virtually all neurons responding to the observation of hand grasping also responded to the observation of grasping with pliers and, many of them to the observation of spearing with a stick. However, the intensity and pattern of the response differed among conditions. Hand grasping observation determined the earliest and the strongest discharge, while pliers grasping and spearing observation triggered weaker responses at longer latencies. We conclude that F5 grasping mirror neurons respond to the observation of a family of stimuli leading to the same goal. However, the response pattern depends upon the similarity between the observed motor act and the one executed by the hand, the natural motor template. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2903687 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29036872010-08-06 Responses of mirror neurons in area F5 to hand and tool grasping observation Rochat, Magali J. Caruana, Fausto Jezzini, Ahmad Escola, Ludovic Intskirveli, Irakli Grammont, Franck Gallese, Vittorio Rizzolatti, Giacomo Umiltà, Maria Alessandra Exp Brain Res Research Article Mirror neurons are a distinct class of neurons that discharge both during the execution of a motor act and during observation of the same or similar motor act performed by another individual. However, the extent to which mirror neurons coding a motor act with a specific goal (e.g., grasping) might also respond to the observation of a motor act having the same goal, but achieved with artificial effectors, is not yet established. In the present study, we addressed this issue by recording mirror neurons from the ventral premotor cortex (area F5) of two monkeys trained to grasp objects with pliers. Neuron activity was recorded during the observation and execution of grasping performed with the hand, with pliers and during observation of an experimenter spearing food with a stick. The results showed that virtually all neurons responding to the observation of hand grasping also responded to the observation of grasping with pliers and, many of them to the observation of spearing with a stick. However, the intensity and pattern of the response differed among conditions. Hand grasping observation determined the earliest and the strongest discharge, while pliers grasping and spearing observation triggered weaker responses at longer latencies. We conclude that F5 grasping mirror neurons respond to the observation of a family of stimuli leading to the same goal. However, the response pattern depends upon the similarity between the observed motor act and the one executed by the hand, the natural motor template. Springer-Verlag 2010-06-26 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2903687/ /pubmed/20577726 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2329-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Rochat, Magali J. Caruana, Fausto Jezzini, Ahmad Escola, Ludovic Intskirveli, Irakli Grammont, Franck Gallese, Vittorio Rizzolatti, Giacomo Umiltà, Maria Alessandra Responses of mirror neurons in area F5 to hand and tool grasping observation |
title | Responses of mirror neurons in area F5 to hand and tool grasping observation |
title_full | Responses of mirror neurons in area F5 to hand and tool grasping observation |
title_fullStr | Responses of mirror neurons in area F5 to hand and tool grasping observation |
title_full_unstemmed | Responses of mirror neurons in area F5 to hand and tool grasping observation |
title_short | Responses of mirror neurons in area F5 to hand and tool grasping observation |
title_sort | responses of mirror neurons in area f5 to hand and tool grasping observation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2903687/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20577726 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2329-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rochatmagalij responsesofmirrorneuronsinareaf5tohandandtoolgraspingobservation AT caruanafausto responsesofmirrorneuronsinareaf5tohandandtoolgraspingobservation AT jezziniahmad responsesofmirrorneuronsinareaf5tohandandtoolgraspingobservation AT escolaludovic responsesofmirrorneuronsinareaf5tohandandtoolgraspingobservation AT intskirveliirakli responsesofmirrorneuronsinareaf5tohandandtoolgraspingobservation AT grammontfranck responsesofmirrorneuronsinareaf5tohandandtoolgraspingobservation AT gallesevittorio responsesofmirrorneuronsinareaf5tohandandtoolgraspingobservation AT rizzolattigiacomo responsesofmirrorneuronsinareaf5tohandandtoolgraspingobservation AT umiltamariaalessandra responsesofmirrorneuronsinareaf5tohandandtoolgraspingobservation |