Cargando…
OPTIGOV - A new methodology for evaluating Clinical Governance implementation by health providers
BACKGROUND: The aim of Clinical Governance (CG) is to the pursuit of quality in health care through the integration of all the activities impacting on the patient into a single strategy. OPTIGOV (Optimizing Health Care Governance) is a methodology for the assessment of the level of implementation of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2904759/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20565967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-10-174 |
_version_ | 1782183905305034752 |
---|---|
author | Specchia, Maria Lucia La Torre, Giuseppe Siliquini, Roberta Capizzi, Silvio Valerio, Luca Nardella, Pierangela Campana, Alessandro Ricciardi, Walter |
author_facet | Specchia, Maria Lucia La Torre, Giuseppe Siliquini, Roberta Capizzi, Silvio Valerio, Luca Nardella, Pierangela Campana, Alessandro Ricciardi, Walter |
author_sort | Specchia, Maria Lucia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim of Clinical Governance (CG) is to the pursuit of quality in health care through the integration of all the activities impacting on the patient into a single strategy. OPTIGOV (Optimizing Health Care Governance) is a methodology for the assessment of the level of implementation of CG within healthcare organizations. The aim of this paper is to explain the process underlying the development of OPTIGOV, and describe its characteristics and steps. METHODS: OPTIGOV was developed in 2006 by the Institute of Hygiene of the Catholic University of the Sacred Heart and Eurogroup Consulting Alliance. The main steps of the process were: choice of areas for analysis and questionnaire development, based on a review of scientific literature; assignment of scores and weights to individual questions and areas; implementation of a software interfaceable with Microsoft Office. RESULTS: OPTIGOV consists of: a) a hospital audit with a structured approach; b) development of an improvement operational plan. A questionnaire divided into 13 areas of analysis is used. For each area there is a form with a variable number of questions and "closed" answers. A score is assigned to each answer, area of analysis, healthcare department and unit. The single scores can be gathered for the organization as a whole. The software application allows for collation of data, calculation of scores and development of benchmarks to allow comparisons between healthcare organizations. Implementation consists of three stages: the preparation phase includes a kick off meeting, selection of interviewees and development of a survey plan. The registration phase includes hospital audits, reviewing of hospital documentation, data collection and score processing. Lastly, results are processed, inserted into a final report, and discussed in a meeting with the Hospital Board and in a final workshop. CONCLUSIONS: The OPTIGOV methodology for the evaluation of CG implementation was developed with an evidence-based approach. The ongoing adoption of OPTIGOV in several projects will put to the test its potential to realistically represent the organization status, pinpoint criticalities and transferable best practices, provide a plan for improvement, and contribute to triggering changes and pursuit of quality in health care. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2904759 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29047592010-07-16 OPTIGOV - A new methodology for evaluating Clinical Governance implementation by health providers Specchia, Maria Lucia La Torre, Giuseppe Siliquini, Roberta Capizzi, Silvio Valerio, Luca Nardella, Pierangela Campana, Alessandro Ricciardi, Walter BMC Health Serv Res Correspondence BACKGROUND: The aim of Clinical Governance (CG) is to the pursuit of quality in health care through the integration of all the activities impacting on the patient into a single strategy. OPTIGOV (Optimizing Health Care Governance) is a methodology for the assessment of the level of implementation of CG within healthcare organizations. The aim of this paper is to explain the process underlying the development of OPTIGOV, and describe its characteristics and steps. METHODS: OPTIGOV was developed in 2006 by the Institute of Hygiene of the Catholic University of the Sacred Heart and Eurogroup Consulting Alliance. The main steps of the process were: choice of areas for analysis and questionnaire development, based on a review of scientific literature; assignment of scores and weights to individual questions and areas; implementation of a software interfaceable with Microsoft Office. RESULTS: OPTIGOV consists of: a) a hospital audit with a structured approach; b) development of an improvement operational plan. A questionnaire divided into 13 areas of analysis is used. For each area there is a form with a variable number of questions and "closed" answers. A score is assigned to each answer, area of analysis, healthcare department and unit. The single scores can be gathered for the organization as a whole. The software application allows for collation of data, calculation of scores and development of benchmarks to allow comparisons between healthcare organizations. Implementation consists of three stages: the preparation phase includes a kick off meeting, selection of interviewees and development of a survey plan. The registration phase includes hospital audits, reviewing of hospital documentation, data collection and score processing. Lastly, results are processed, inserted into a final report, and discussed in a meeting with the Hospital Board and in a final workshop. CONCLUSIONS: The OPTIGOV methodology for the evaluation of CG implementation was developed with an evidence-based approach. The ongoing adoption of OPTIGOV in several projects will put to the test its potential to realistically represent the organization status, pinpoint criticalities and transferable best practices, provide a plan for improvement, and contribute to triggering changes and pursuit of quality in health care. BioMed Central 2010-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC2904759/ /pubmed/20565967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-10-174 Text en Copyright ©2010 Specchia et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Correspondence Specchia, Maria Lucia La Torre, Giuseppe Siliquini, Roberta Capizzi, Silvio Valerio, Luca Nardella, Pierangela Campana, Alessandro Ricciardi, Walter OPTIGOV - A new methodology for evaluating Clinical Governance implementation by health providers |
title | OPTIGOV - A new methodology for evaluating Clinical Governance implementation by health providers |
title_full | OPTIGOV - A new methodology for evaluating Clinical Governance implementation by health providers |
title_fullStr | OPTIGOV - A new methodology for evaluating Clinical Governance implementation by health providers |
title_full_unstemmed | OPTIGOV - A new methodology for evaluating Clinical Governance implementation by health providers |
title_short | OPTIGOV - A new methodology for evaluating Clinical Governance implementation by health providers |
title_sort | optigov - a new methodology for evaluating clinical governance implementation by health providers |
topic | Correspondence |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2904759/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20565967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-10-174 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT specchiamarialucia optigovanewmethodologyforevaluatingclinicalgovernanceimplementationbyhealthproviders AT latorregiuseppe optigovanewmethodologyforevaluatingclinicalgovernanceimplementationbyhealthproviders AT siliquiniroberta optigovanewmethodologyforevaluatingclinicalgovernanceimplementationbyhealthproviders AT capizzisilvio optigovanewmethodologyforevaluatingclinicalgovernanceimplementationbyhealthproviders AT valerioluca optigovanewmethodologyforevaluatingclinicalgovernanceimplementationbyhealthproviders AT nardellapierangela optigovanewmethodologyforevaluatingclinicalgovernanceimplementationbyhealthproviders AT campanaalessandro optigovanewmethodologyforevaluatingclinicalgovernanceimplementationbyhealthproviders AT ricciardiwalter optigovanewmethodologyforevaluatingclinicalgovernanceimplementationbyhealthproviders |