Cargando…

OPTIGOV - A new methodology for evaluating Clinical Governance implementation by health providers

BACKGROUND: The aim of Clinical Governance (CG) is to the pursuit of quality in health care through the integration of all the activities impacting on the patient into a single strategy. OPTIGOV (Optimizing Health Care Governance) is a methodology for the assessment of the level of implementation of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Specchia, Maria Lucia, La Torre, Giuseppe, Siliquini, Roberta, Capizzi, Silvio, Valerio, Luca, Nardella, Pierangela, Campana, Alessandro, Ricciardi, Walter
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2904759/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20565967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-10-174
_version_ 1782183905305034752
author Specchia, Maria Lucia
La Torre, Giuseppe
Siliquini, Roberta
Capizzi, Silvio
Valerio, Luca
Nardella, Pierangela
Campana, Alessandro
Ricciardi, Walter
author_facet Specchia, Maria Lucia
La Torre, Giuseppe
Siliquini, Roberta
Capizzi, Silvio
Valerio, Luca
Nardella, Pierangela
Campana, Alessandro
Ricciardi, Walter
author_sort Specchia, Maria Lucia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of Clinical Governance (CG) is to the pursuit of quality in health care through the integration of all the activities impacting on the patient into a single strategy. OPTIGOV (Optimizing Health Care Governance) is a methodology for the assessment of the level of implementation of CG within healthcare organizations. The aim of this paper is to explain the process underlying the development of OPTIGOV, and describe its characteristics and steps. METHODS: OPTIGOV was developed in 2006 by the Institute of Hygiene of the Catholic University of the Sacred Heart and Eurogroup Consulting Alliance. The main steps of the process were: choice of areas for analysis and questionnaire development, based on a review of scientific literature; assignment of scores and weights to individual questions and areas; implementation of a software interfaceable with Microsoft Office. RESULTS: OPTIGOV consists of: a) a hospital audit with a structured approach; b) development of an improvement operational plan. A questionnaire divided into 13 areas of analysis is used. For each area there is a form with a variable number of questions and "closed" answers. A score is assigned to each answer, area of analysis, healthcare department and unit. The single scores can be gathered for the organization as a whole. The software application allows for collation of data, calculation of scores and development of benchmarks to allow comparisons between healthcare organizations. Implementation consists of three stages: the preparation phase includes a kick off meeting, selection of interviewees and development of a survey plan. The registration phase includes hospital audits, reviewing of hospital documentation, data collection and score processing. Lastly, results are processed, inserted into a final report, and discussed in a meeting with the Hospital Board and in a final workshop. CONCLUSIONS: The OPTIGOV methodology for the evaluation of CG implementation was developed with an evidence-based approach. The ongoing adoption of OPTIGOV in several projects will put to the test its potential to realistically represent the organization status, pinpoint criticalities and transferable best practices, provide a plan for improvement, and contribute to triggering changes and pursuit of quality in health care.
format Text
id pubmed-2904759
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29047592010-07-16 OPTIGOV - A new methodology for evaluating Clinical Governance implementation by health providers Specchia, Maria Lucia La Torre, Giuseppe Siliquini, Roberta Capizzi, Silvio Valerio, Luca Nardella, Pierangela Campana, Alessandro Ricciardi, Walter BMC Health Serv Res Correspondence BACKGROUND: The aim of Clinical Governance (CG) is to the pursuit of quality in health care through the integration of all the activities impacting on the patient into a single strategy. OPTIGOV (Optimizing Health Care Governance) is a methodology for the assessment of the level of implementation of CG within healthcare organizations. The aim of this paper is to explain the process underlying the development of OPTIGOV, and describe its characteristics and steps. METHODS: OPTIGOV was developed in 2006 by the Institute of Hygiene of the Catholic University of the Sacred Heart and Eurogroup Consulting Alliance. The main steps of the process were: choice of areas for analysis and questionnaire development, based on a review of scientific literature; assignment of scores and weights to individual questions and areas; implementation of a software interfaceable with Microsoft Office. RESULTS: OPTIGOV consists of: a) a hospital audit with a structured approach; b) development of an improvement operational plan. A questionnaire divided into 13 areas of analysis is used. For each area there is a form with a variable number of questions and "closed" answers. A score is assigned to each answer, area of analysis, healthcare department and unit. The single scores can be gathered for the organization as a whole. The software application allows for collation of data, calculation of scores and development of benchmarks to allow comparisons between healthcare organizations. Implementation consists of three stages: the preparation phase includes a kick off meeting, selection of interviewees and development of a survey plan. The registration phase includes hospital audits, reviewing of hospital documentation, data collection and score processing. Lastly, results are processed, inserted into a final report, and discussed in a meeting with the Hospital Board and in a final workshop. CONCLUSIONS: The OPTIGOV methodology for the evaluation of CG implementation was developed with an evidence-based approach. The ongoing adoption of OPTIGOV in several projects will put to the test its potential to realistically represent the organization status, pinpoint criticalities and transferable best practices, provide a plan for improvement, and contribute to triggering changes and pursuit of quality in health care. BioMed Central 2010-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC2904759/ /pubmed/20565967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-10-174 Text en Copyright ©2010 Specchia et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Correspondence
Specchia, Maria Lucia
La Torre, Giuseppe
Siliquini, Roberta
Capizzi, Silvio
Valerio, Luca
Nardella, Pierangela
Campana, Alessandro
Ricciardi, Walter
OPTIGOV - A new methodology for evaluating Clinical Governance implementation by health providers
title OPTIGOV - A new methodology for evaluating Clinical Governance implementation by health providers
title_full OPTIGOV - A new methodology for evaluating Clinical Governance implementation by health providers
title_fullStr OPTIGOV - A new methodology for evaluating Clinical Governance implementation by health providers
title_full_unstemmed OPTIGOV - A new methodology for evaluating Clinical Governance implementation by health providers
title_short OPTIGOV - A new methodology for evaluating Clinical Governance implementation by health providers
title_sort optigov - a new methodology for evaluating clinical governance implementation by health providers
topic Correspondence
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2904759/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20565967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-10-174
work_keys_str_mv AT specchiamarialucia optigovanewmethodologyforevaluatingclinicalgovernanceimplementationbyhealthproviders
AT latorregiuseppe optigovanewmethodologyforevaluatingclinicalgovernanceimplementationbyhealthproviders
AT siliquiniroberta optigovanewmethodologyforevaluatingclinicalgovernanceimplementationbyhealthproviders
AT capizzisilvio optigovanewmethodologyforevaluatingclinicalgovernanceimplementationbyhealthproviders
AT valerioluca optigovanewmethodologyforevaluatingclinicalgovernanceimplementationbyhealthproviders
AT nardellapierangela optigovanewmethodologyforevaluatingclinicalgovernanceimplementationbyhealthproviders
AT campanaalessandro optigovanewmethodologyforevaluatingclinicalgovernanceimplementationbyhealthproviders
AT ricciardiwalter optigovanewmethodologyforevaluatingclinicalgovernanceimplementationbyhealthproviders