Cargando…
Genome-wide analysis of ETS-family DNA-binding in vitro and in vivo
Members of the large ETS family of transcription factors (TFs) have highly similar DNA-binding domains (DBDs)—yet they have diverse functions and activities in physiology and oncogenesis. Some differences in DNA-binding preferences within this family have been described, but they have not been analy...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2905244/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20517297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2010.106 |
_version_ | 1782183938333081600 |
---|---|
author | Wei, Gong-Hong Badis, Gwenael Berger, Michael F Kivioja, Teemu Palin, Kimmo Enge, Martin Bonke, Martin Jolma, Arttu Varjosalo, Markku Gehrke, Andrew R Yan, Jian Talukder, Shaheynoor Turunen, Mikko Taipale, Mikko Stunnenberg, Hendrik G Ukkonen, Esko Hughes, Timothy R Bulyk, Martha L Taipale, Jussi |
author_facet | Wei, Gong-Hong Badis, Gwenael Berger, Michael F Kivioja, Teemu Palin, Kimmo Enge, Martin Bonke, Martin Jolma, Arttu Varjosalo, Markku Gehrke, Andrew R Yan, Jian Talukder, Shaheynoor Turunen, Mikko Taipale, Mikko Stunnenberg, Hendrik G Ukkonen, Esko Hughes, Timothy R Bulyk, Martha L Taipale, Jussi |
author_sort | Wei, Gong-Hong |
collection | PubMed |
description | Members of the large ETS family of transcription factors (TFs) have highly similar DNA-binding domains (DBDs)—yet they have diverse functions and activities in physiology and oncogenesis. Some differences in DNA-binding preferences within this family have been described, but they have not been analysed systematically, and their contributions to targeting remain largely uncharacterized. We report here the DNA-binding profiles for all human and mouse ETS factors, which we generated using two different methods: a high-throughput microwell-based TF DNA-binding specificity assay, and protein-binding microarrays (PBMs). Both approaches reveal that the ETS-binding profiles cluster into four distinct classes, and that all ETS factors linked to cancer, ERG, ETV1, ETV4 and FLI1, fall into just one of these classes. We identify amino-acid residues that are critical for the differences in specificity between all the classes, and confirm the specificities in vivo using chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (ChIP-seq) for a member of each class. The results indicate that even relatively small differences in in vitro binding specificity of a TF contribute to site selectivity in vivo. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2905244 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29052442010-08-03 Genome-wide analysis of ETS-family DNA-binding in vitro and in vivo Wei, Gong-Hong Badis, Gwenael Berger, Michael F Kivioja, Teemu Palin, Kimmo Enge, Martin Bonke, Martin Jolma, Arttu Varjosalo, Markku Gehrke, Andrew R Yan, Jian Talukder, Shaheynoor Turunen, Mikko Taipale, Mikko Stunnenberg, Hendrik G Ukkonen, Esko Hughes, Timothy R Bulyk, Martha L Taipale, Jussi EMBO J Article Members of the large ETS family of transcription factors (TFs) have highly similar DNA-binding domains (DBDs)—yet they have diverse functions and activities in physiology and oncogenesis. Some differences in DNA-binding preferences within this family have been described, but they have not been analysed systematically, and their contributions to targeting remain largely uncharacterized. We report here the DNA-binding profiles for all human and mouse ETS factors, which we generated using two different methods: a high-throughput microwell-based TF DNA-binding specificity assay, and protein-binding microarrays (PBMs). Both approaches reveal that the ETS-binding profiles cluster into four distinct classes, and that all ETS factors linked to cancer, ERG, ETV1, ETV4 and FLI1, fall into just one of these classes. We identify amino-acid residues that are critical for the differences in specificity between all the classes, and confirm the specificities in vivo using chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (ChIP-seq) for a member of each class. The results indicate that even relatively small differences in in vitro binding specificity of a TF contribute to site selectivity in vivo. Nature Publishing Group 2010-07-07 2010-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2905244/ /pubmed/20517297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2010.106 Text en Copyright © 2010, European Molecular Biology Organization http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial Share Alike 3.0 Unported License, which allows readers to alter, transform, or build upon the article and then distribute the resulting work under the same or similar license to this one. The work must be attributed back to the original author and commercial use is not permitted without specific permission. |
spellingShingle | Article Wei, Gong-Hong Badis, Gwenael Berger, Michael F Kivioja, Teemu Palin, Kimmo Enge, Martin Bonke, Martin Jolma, Arttu Varjosalo, Markku Gehrke, Andrew R Yan, Jian Talukder, Shaheynoor Turunen, Mikko Taipale, Mikko Stunnenberg, Hendrik G Ukkonen, Esko Hughes, Timothy R Bulyk, Martha L Taipale, Jussi Genome-wide analysis of ETS-family DNA-binding in vitro and in vivo |
title | Genome-wide analysis of ETS-family DNA-binding in vitro and in vivo |
title_full | Genome-wide analysis of ETS-family DNA-binding in vitro and in vivo |
title_fullStr | Genome-wide analysis of ETS-family DNA-binding in vitro and in vivo |
title_full_unstemmed | Genome-wide analysis of ETS-family DNA-binding in vitro and in vivo |
title_short | Genome-wide analysis of ETS-family DNA-binding in vitro and in vivo |
title_sort | genome-wide analysis of ets-family dna-binding in vitro and in vivo |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2905244/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20517297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2010.106 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT weigonghong genomewideanalysisofetsfamilydnabindinginvitroandinvivo AT badisgwenael genomewideanalysisofetsfamilydnabindinginvitroandinvivo AT bergermichaelf genomewideanalysisofetsfamilydnabindinginvitroandinvivo AT kiviojateemu genomewideanalysisofetsfamilydnabindinginvitroandinvivo AT palinkimmo genomewideanalysisofetsfamilydnabindinginvitroandinvivo AT engemartin genomewideanalysisofetsfamilydnabindinginvitroandinvivo AT bonkemartin genomewideanalysisofetsfamilydnabindinginvitroandinvivo AT jolmaarttu genomewideanalysisofetsfamilydnabindinginvitroandinvivo AT varjosalomarkku genomewideanalysisofetsfamilydnabindinginvitroandinvivo AT gehrkeandrewr genomewideanalysisofetsfamilydnabindinginvitroandinvivo AT yanjian genomewideanalysisofetsfamilydnabindinginvitroandinvivo AT talukdershaheynoor genomewideanalysisofetsfamilydnabindinginvitroandinvivo AT turunenmikko genomewideanalysisofetsfamilydnabindinginvitroandinvivo AT taipalemikko genomewideanalysisofetsfamilydnabindinginvitroandinvivo AT stunnenberghendrikg genomewideanalysisofetsfamilydnabindinginvitroandinvivo AT ukkonenesko genomewideanalysisofetsfamilydnabindinginvitroandinvivo AT hughestimothyr genomewideanalysisofetsfamilydnabindinginvitroandinvivo AT bulykmarthal genomewideanalysisofetsfamilydnabindinginvitroandinvivo AT taipalejussi genomewideanalysisofetsfamilydnabindinginvitroandinvivo |