Cargando…
A critical experimental study of the classical tactile threshold theory
BACKGROUND: The tactile sense is being used in a variety of applications involving tactile human-machine interfaces. In a significant number of publications the classical threshold concept plays a central role in modelling and explaining psychophysical experimental results such as in stochastic reso...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2905429/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20565891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-11-76 |
_version_ | 1782183963840741376 |
---|---|
author | Perez, Claudio A Donoso, José R Medina, Leonel E |
author_facet | Perez, Claudio A Donoso, José R Medina, Leonel E |
author_sort | Perez, Claudio A |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The tactile sense is being used in a variety of applications involving tactile human-machine interfaces. In a significant number of publications the classical threshold concept plays a central role in modelling and explaining psychophysical experimental results such as in stochastic resonance (SR) phenomena. In SR, noise enhances detection of sub-threshold stimuli and the phenomenon is explained stating that the required amplitude to exceed the sensory threshold barrier can be reached by adding noise to a sub-threshold stimulus. We designed an experiment to test the validity of the classical vibrotactile threshold. Using a second choice experiment, we show that individuals can order sensorial events below the level known as the classical threshold. If the observer's sensorial system is not activated by stimuli below the threshold, then a second choice could not be above the chance level. Nevertheless, our experimental results are above that chance level contradicting the definition of the classical tactile threshold. RESULTS: We performed a three alternative forced choice detection experiment on 6 subjects asking them first and second choices. In each trial, only one of the intervals contained a stimulus and the others contained only noise. According to the classical threshold assumptions, a correct second choice response corresponds to a guess attempt with a statistical frequency of 50%. Results show an average of 67.35% (STD = 1.41%) for the second choice response that is not explained by the classical threshold definition. Additionally, for low stimulus amplitudes, second choice correct detection is above chance level for any detectability level. CONCLUSIONS: Using a second choice experiment, we show that individuals can order sensorial events below the level known as a classical threshold. If the observer's sensorial system is not activated by stimuli below the threshold, then a second choice could not be above the chance level. Nevertheless, our experimental results are above that chance level. Therefore, if detection exists below the classical threshold level, then the model to explain the SR phenomenon or any other tactile perception phenomena based on the psychophysical classical threshold is not valid. We conclude that a more suitable model of the tactile sensory system is needed. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2905429 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29054292010-07-17 A critical experimental study of the classical tactile threshold theory Perez, Claudio A Donoso, José R Medina, Leonel E BMC Neurosci Research Article BACKGROUND: The tactile sense is being used in a variety of applications involving tactile human-machine interfaces. In a significant number of publications the classical threshold concept plays a central role in modelling and explaining psychophysical experimental results such as in stochastic resonance (SR) phenomena. In SR, noise enhances detection of sub-threshold stimuli and the phenomenon is explained stating that the required amplitude to exceed the sensory threshold barrier can be reached by adding noise to a sub-threshold stimulus. We designed an experiment to test the validity of the classical vibrotactile threshold. Using a second choice experiment, we show that individuals can order sensorial events below the level known as the classical threshold. If the observer's sensorial system is not activated by stimuli below the threshold, then a second choice could not be above the chance level. Nevertheless, our experimental results are above that chance level contradicting the definition of the classical tactile threshold. RESULTS: We performed a three alternative forced choice detection experiment on 6 subjects asking them first and second choices. In each trial, only one of the intervals contained a stimulus and the others contained only noise. According to the classical threshold assumptions, a correct second choice response corresponds to a guess attempt with a statistical frequency of 50%. Results show an average of 67.35% (STD = 1.41%) for the second choice response that is not explained by the classical threshold definition. Additionally, for low stimulus amplitudes, second choice correct detection is above chance level for any detectability level. CONCLUSIONS: Using a second choice experiment, we show that individuals can order sensorial events below the level known as a classical threshold. If the observer's sensorial system is not activated by stimuli below the threshold, then a second choice could not be above the chance level. Nevertheless, our experimental results are above that chance level. Therefore, if detection exists below the classical threshold level, then the model to explain the SR phenomenon or any other tactile perception phenomena based on the psychophysical classical threshold is not valid. We conclude that a more suitable model of the tactile sensory system is needed. BioMed Central 2010-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC2905429/ /pubmed/20565891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-11-76 Text en Copyright ©2010 Perez et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Perez, Claudio A Donoso, José R Medina, Leonel E A critical experimental study of the classical tactile threshold theory |
title | A critical experimental study of the classical tactile threshold theory |
title_full | A critical experimental study of the classical tactile threshold theory |
title_fullStr | A critical experimental study of the classical tactile threshold theory |
title_full_unstemmed | A critical experimental study of the classical tactile threshold theory |
title_short | A critical experimental study of the classical tactile threshold theory |
title_sort | critical experimental study of the classical tactile threshold theory |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2905429/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20565891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-11-76 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT perezclaudioa acriticalexperimentalstudyoftheclassicaltactilethresholdtheory AT donosojoser acriticalexperimentalstudyoftheclassicaltactilethresholdtheory AT medinaleonele acriticalexperimentalstudyoftheclassicaltactilethresholdtheory AT perezclaudioa criticalexperimentalstudyoftheclassicaltactilethresholdtheory AT donosojoser criticalexperimentalstudyoftheclassicaltactilethresholdtheory AT medinaleonele criticalexperimentalstudyoftheclassicaltactilethresholdtheory |